• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

获得性中枢性失读症的眼动相关研究。

Eye movement correlates of acquired central dyslexia.

机构信息

Medical Faculty, Department of Neurology, Section Neurolinguistics, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2010 Aug;48(10):2959-73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.005. Epub 2010 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.005
PMID:20547168
Abstract

Based on recent progress in theory and measurement techniques, the analysis of eye movements has become one of the major methodological tools in experimental reading research. Our work uses this approach to advance the understanding of impaired information processing in acquired central dyslexia of stroke patients with aphasia. Up to now there has been no research attempting to analyze both word-based viewing time measures and local fixation patterns in dyslexic readers. The goal of the study was to find out whether specific eye movement parameters reflect pathologically preferred segmental reading in contrast to lexical reading. We compared oral reading of single words of normal controls (n=11) with six aphasic participants (two cases of deep, surface and residual dyslexia each). Participants were asked to read aloud lines of target words differing in length and frequency. Segmental reading was characterized by deviant spatial distribution of saccadic landing positions with initial fixations located mainly at the beginning of the word, while lexical readers showed the normative 'preferred landing positions' left to the center of the words. Contrary to expectation, word length did not distinguish between segmental and lexical readers, while word frequency showed the expected effect for lexical readers only. Their mean fixation duration was already prolonged during first pass reading reflecting their attempts of immediate access to lexical information. After first pass reading, re-reading time was significantly increased in all participants with acquired central dyslexia due to their exceedingly higher monitoring demands for oral reading.

摘要

基于理论和测量技术的最新进展,眼动分析已成为实验阅读研究中的主要方法工具之一。我们的工作使用这种方法来深入了解伴有失语症的脑卒中获得性中央性失读症患者的信息处理障碍。到目前为止,还没有研究试图分析阅读障碍者的基于单词的注视时间测量值和局部注视模式。该研究的目的是找出特定的眼动参数是否反映了病理性的分段阅读,而不是词汇阅读。我们比较了正常对照组(n=11)和 6 名失语症参与者(每种类型各 2 名)的单个单词的朗读。要求参与者大声朗读目标单词的行,这些单词的长度和频率不同。分段阅读的特点是眼跳的着陆位置的空间分布异常,初始注视主要位于单词的开头,而词汇阅读者则表现出正常的“首选着陆位置”,即位于单词的中心左侧。与预期相反,单词长度并不能区分分段阅读者和词汇阅读者,而单词频率仅对词汇阅读者表现出预期的效果。他们的首次阅读时的平均注视时间已经延长,反映了他们试图立即获取词汇信息。在首次阅读后,由于需要对口头阅读进行过高的监控,所有患有获得性中央性失读症的参与者的重读时间都显著增加。

相似文献

1
Eye movement correlates of acquired central dyslexia.获得性中枢性失读症的眼动相关研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Aug;48(10):2959-73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.005. Epub 2010 Jun 12.
2
An eye movement based reading intervention in lexical and segmental readers with acquired dyslexia.一项针对获得性阅读障碍的词汇和片段阅读者的基于眼动的阅读干预。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(6):833-67. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2014.913530. Epub 2014 May 9.
3
Task-dependent modulation of neglect dyslexia? Novel evidence from the viewing position effect.忽视性阅读障碍的任务依赖型调制?来自观看位置效应的新证据。
Brain Res. 2008 Jan 16;1189:166-78. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.069. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
4
Different behavioral and eye movement patterns of dyslexic readers with and without attentional deficits during single word reading.在单字阅读过程中,伴有和不伴有注意力缺陷的阅读障碍读者的不同行为和眼动模式。
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Oct;47(12):2436-45. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.04.006. Epub 2009 Apr 19.
5
Word length and word frequency affect eye movements in dyslexic children reading in a regular (German) orthography.词长和词频影响阅读正字法(德语)的诵读困难儿童的眼球运动。
Ann Dyslexia. 2010 Jun;60(1):86-101. doi: 10.1007/s11881-010-0034-9. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
6
Perhaps correlational but not causal: no effect of dyslexic readers' magnocellular system on their eye movements during reading.可能具有相关性但无因果关系:阅读障碍读者的大细胞系统对其阅读时的眼动没有影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(4):637-48. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.06.006. Epub 2005 Aug 22.
7
Recovery of oculo-motor bias in neglect patients after prism adaptation.棱镜适应后忽视患者眼动偏差的恢复
Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(9):1223-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.01.007.
8
The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: evidence for lexical control of eye movements.阅读中词频和格交替效应对注视时间的时间进程:词汇控制眼球运动的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1677-83. doi: 10.1037/a0019959.
9
Inducing letter-by-letter dyslexia in normal readers.在正常阅读者中诱发逐字母阅读障碍。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Sep;18(9):1466-76. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.9.1466.
10
Task effects on eye movements during reading.阅读时任务对眼球运动的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Nov;36(6):1561-6. doi: 10.1037/a0020693.

引用本文的文献

1
Eye Movements of Persons with Aphasia During Connected-Text Reading.失语症患者在连贯文本阅读过程中的眼球运动
Aphasiology. 2024 Oct 17. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2024.2413620.
2
How do patients with Parkinson's disease and cerebellar ataxia read aloud? -Eye-voice coordination in text reading.帕金森病和小脑共济失调患者如何大声朗读?——文本阅读中的眼声协调
Front Neurosci. 2023 Aug 11;17:1202404. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1202404. eCollection 2023.
3
Perceptual span in individuals with aphasia.失语症患者的感知广度。
Aphasiology. 2020;34(2):235-253. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2019.1591612. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
4
Early Brain Sensitivity to Word Frequency and Lexicality During Reading Aloud and Implicit Reading.朗读和默读过程中大脑对词频和词汇性的早期敏感性
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 11;10:830. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00830. eCollection 2019.
5
Task-Related Differences in Eye Movements in Individuals With Aphasia.失语症患者眼动的任务相关差异。
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 18;9:2430. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02430. eCollection 2018.
6
Effects of Lexical Variables on Silent Reading Comprehension in Individuals With Aphasia: Evidence From Eye Tracking.词汇变量对失语症患者默读阅读理解的影响:来自眼动追踪的证据。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Sep 18;60(9):2589-2602. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0045.
7
When the Eyes No Longer Lead: Familiarity and Length Effects on Eye-Voice Span.当眼睛不再引领:熟悉度和长度对眼声跨度的影响。
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 2;7:1720. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01720. eCollection 2016.