Vissing S F, Scherrer U, Victor R G
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75235-9034.
Circ Res. 1991 Jul;69(1):228-38. doi: 10.1161/01.res.69.1.228.
Microneurographic measurements of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) have suggested that, during static exercise, central command is much less important than skeletal muscle afferents in causing sympathetic neural activation. The possibility remains, however, that the sympathetic discharge produced by central command is targeted mainly to tissues other than skeletal muscle. To examine this possibility, we recorded SNA with microelectrodes placed selectively in skin, as well as in muscle, nerve fascicles of the peroneal nerve during static handgrip maneuvers designed to separate the effects of central command from those of muscle afferents. To study the relative effects of cutaneous sympathetic activation on sudomotor versus vasomotor function, we simultaneously estimated changes in skin blood flow (laser Doppler velocimetry) and in sudomotor (electrodermal) activation in the region of skin innervated by the impaled nerve fascicle. Two minutes of static handgrip at 10%, 20%, and 30% of maximal voluntary contraction caused large and intensity-dependent increases in skin SNA. These increases in SNA immediately preceded the onset of muscle tension, accelerated progressively during sustained handgrip, and resolved promptly with the cessation of motor effort. The handgrip-induced increases in skin SNA were not maintained when handgrip was followed by arrest of the forearm circulation, a maneuver that maintains the stimulation of chemically sensitive muscle afferents while eliminating the influences of central command and mechanically sensitive muscle afferents. During normothermia, static handgrip at 30% maximal voluntary contraction caused sustained increases in skin SNA (+400 +/- 83%, mean +/- SEM, p less than 0.05) and in electrodermal activity (+276 +/- 56%, p less than 0.05) but only transient increases in estimated skin vascular resistance (+11 +/- 2%, p less than 0.05). When skin temperature was increased or decreased to a new stable baseline level, subsequent increases in skin SNA during handgrip were accompanied by sustained but directionally opposite changes in estimated skin vascular resistance, with exercise-induced vasodilation during hyperthermia but exercise-induced vasoconstriction during hypothermia. From these observations, we conclude the following: 1) static exercise markedly increases sympathetic outflow to skin as well as to skeletal muscle; 2) the increases in skin SNA, unlike muscle SNA, appear to be caused mainly by central command rather than by muscle afferent reflexes; and 3) this cutaneous sympathetic activation appears to be targeted both to sweat glands and to vascular smooth muscle, with the relative targeting being temperature dependent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
对肌肉交感神经活动(SNA)的微神经图测量表明,在静态运动期间,中枢指令在引起交感神经激活方面远不如骨骼肌传入神经重要。然而,中枢指令产生的交感神经放电主要针对骨骼肌以外组织的可能性仍然存在。为了检验这种可能性,我们在静态握力动作过程中,将微电极选择性地置于皮肤以及腓总神经的肌肉神经束中记录SNA,这些动作旨在区分中枢指令和肌肉传入神经的影响。为了研究皮肤交感神经激活对发汗运动与血管运动功能的相对影响,我们同时估计了由刺入神经束支配的皮肤区域的皮肤血流变化(激光多普勒测速法)和发汗运动(皮肤电活动)激活情况。以最大自主收缩的10%、20%和30%进行两分钟的静态握力,会导致皮肤SNA大幅且强度依赖性增加。这些SNA的增加在肌肉张力开始之前即刻出现,在持续握力过程中逐渐加速,并在停止运动努力后迅速消失。当握力后紧接着阻断前臂循环时,握力引起的皮肤SNA增加并未持续,这种操作在消除中枢指令和机械敏感肌肉传入神经影响的同时,维持了对化学敏感肌肉传入神经的刺激。在正常体温下,以最大自主收缩的30%进行静态握力会导致皮肤SNA持续增加(+400±83%,平均值±标准误,p<0.05)和皮肤电活动增加(+276±56%,p<0.05),但估计的皮肤血管阻力仅短暂增加(+11±2%,p<0.05)。当皮肤温度升高或降低到新的稳定基线水平时,随后握力期间皮肤SNA的增加伴随着估计皮肤血管阻力持续但方向相反的变化,高温时运动诱导血管舒张,低温时运动诱导血管收缩。从这些观察结果中,我们得出以下结论:1)静态运动显著增加了对皮肤以及骨骼肌的交感神经输出;2)与肌肉SNA不同,皮肤SNA的增加似乎主要由中枢指令而非肌肉传入反射引起;3)这种皮肤交感神经激活似乎同时针对汗腺和血管平滑肌,相对靶向作用取决于温度。(摘要截短至400字)