• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用思维导图技术进行公众参与过程中的快速定性数据分析。

Using mind mapping techniques for rapid qualitative data analysis in public participation processes.

机构信息

Public Health Department, NHS Stockport, Stockport Deputy Director of Public Health, NHS Stockport, Stockport, UK. jilla.burgess-allen@nhsstock

出版信息

Health Expect. 2010 Dec;13(4):406-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00594.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00594.x
PMID:20550595
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5060552/
Abstract

CONTEXT

In a health service environment where timescales for patient participation in service design are short and resources scarce, a balance needs to be achieved between research rigour and the timeliness and utility of the findings of patient participation processes.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a pragmatic mind mapping approach to managing the qualitative data from patient participation processes.

DESIGN

While this article draws on experience of using mind maps in a variety of participation processes, a single example is used to illustrate the approach. In this example mind maps were created during the course of patient participation focus groups. Two group discussions were also transcribed verbatim to allow comparison of the rapid mind mapping approach with traditional thematic analysis of qualitative data.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

The illustrative example formed part of a local alcohol service review which included consultation with local alcohol service users, their families and staff groups.

FINDINGS

The mind mapping approach provided a pleasing graphical format for representing the key themes raised during the focus groups. It helped stimulate and galvanize discussion and keep it on track, enhanced transparency and group ownership of the data analysis process, allowed a rapid dynamic between data collection and feedback, and was considerably faster than traditional methods for the analysis of focus groups, while resulting in similar broad themes.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the use of a mind mapping approach to managing qualitative data can provide a pragmatic resolution of the tension between limited resources and quality in patient participation processes.

摘要

背景

在医疗服务环境中,患者参与服务设计的时间有限,资源稀缺,因此需要在研究的严谨性与患者参与过程的及时性和实用性之间取得平衡。

目的

开发一种实用的思维导图方法来管理患者参与过程的定性数据。

设计

虽然本文借鉴了在各种参与过程中使用思维导图的经验,但仅使用一个示例来说明该方法。在此示例中,思维导图是在患者参与焦点小组过程中创建的。还逐字转录了两次小组讨论,以便将快速思维导图方法与传统的定性数据分析主题分析进行比较。

地点和参与者

该示例形成了当地酒精服务审查的一部分,其中包括与当地酒精服务使用者、他们的家人和工作人员团体的协商。

发现

思维导图方法为突出显示焦点小组中提出的关键主题提供了令人愉悦的图形格式。它有助于激发和激发讨论并使其保持在正轨上,增强了数据分析过程的透明度和小组所有权,允许在数据收集和反馈之间快速动态交互,并且比传统的焦点小组分析方法快得多,同时产生了类似的广泛主题。

结论

这项研究表明,使用思维导图方法来管理定性数据可以为患者参与过程中资源有限与质量之间的紧张关系提供一种实用的解决方案。

相似文献

1
Using mind mapping techniques for rapid qualitative data analysis in public participation processes.运用思维导图技术进行公众参与过程中的快速定性数据分析。
Health Expect. 2010 Dec;13(4):406-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00594.x.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
4
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
5
Patient Partner Perspectives Regarding Ethically and Clinically Important Aspects of Trial Design in Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trials for Hemodialysis.患者伙伴对血液透析实用整群随机试验中试验设计的伦理和临床重要方面的看法。
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2021 Jul 26;8:20543581211032818. doi: 10.1177/20543581211032818. eCollection 2021.
6
Pitfalls, perils and payments: service user, carers and teaching staff perceptions of the barriers to involvement in nursing education.陷阱、危险和报酬:服务使用者、护理人员和教学人员对参与护理教育的障碍的看法。
Nurse Educ Today. 2012 Oct;32(7):829-34. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.04.013. Epub 2012 May 15.
7
What do service users with bipolar disorder want from a web-based self-management intervention? A qualitative focus group study.双相障碍患者对基于网络的自我管理干预有何期望?一项定性焦点小组研究。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2013 Nov-Dec;20(6):531-43. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1804. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
8
Facilitating community participation in family planning and contraceptive services provision and uptake: community and health provider perspectives.促进社区参与计划生育及避孕服务的提供与使用:社区及卫生服务提供者的观点
Reprod Health. 2020 Aug 8;17(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00968-x.
9
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of the National Health Service diabetes prevention programme in England: qualitative study with service users, intervention providers and deliverers, commissioners and referrers.利益相关者对英格兰国民保健服务糖尿病预防计划的看法和体验:对服务使用者、干预提供者和实施者、委托人和推荐者进行的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 15;20(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05160-2.
10
Multiple stakeholders' perspectives on patient and public involvement in community mental health services research: A qualitative analysis.多利益相关者对社区心理健康服务研究中患者和公众参与的观点:定性分析。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1844-1860. doi: 10.1111/hex.13529. Epub 2022 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring nurse perspectives on AI-based shift scheduling for fairness, transparency, and work-life balance.探索护士对基于人工智能的轮班排班在公平性、透明度和工作与生活平衡方面的看法。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Sep 2;24(1):1161. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03808-0.
2
Developing service models for adult palliative and end of life care for people with a learning disability (The DAPPLE Project): protocol for a mixed-method study.为学习障碍成人患者制定姑息治疗和临终关怀服务模式(DAPPLE项目):一项混合方法研究的方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 25;15(7):e106752. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106752.
3
TRANSFER-I: Hospitalised Older Adults and Their Carers' Perspectives of the Transition Home: A Qualitative Study.TRANSFER - I:住院老年人及其照顾者对回家过渡的看法:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70343. doi: 10.1111/hex.70343.
4
Protocol: Applying co-production and peer research approaches with community organisations to develop a blueprint for the centre for Co-Production and Peer Research (CoPPeR) network.方案:与社区组织采用共同生产和同伴研究方法,为共同生产与同伴研究中心(CoPPeR)网络制定蓝图。
NIHR Open Res. 2025 Apr 2;5:27. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13886.1. eCollection 2025.
5
Barriers and Facilitators to Physical Activity Among Black Older Adult Parishioners.黑人老年教区居民身体活动的障碍与促进因素
J Relig Health. 2025 Mar 7. doi: 10.1007/s10943-025-02281-y.
6
Co-creation methods for public health research - characteristics, benefits, and challenges: a Health CASCADE scoping review.公共卫生研究的共创方法——特点、益处及挑战:一项健康级联范围综述
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Mar 6;25(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02514-4.
7
Evaluation of a notes-based rapid qualitative analysis method to facilitate implementation.评估一种基于笔记的快速定性分析方法以促进实施。
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Mar 3;6(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00709-w.
8
Enhancing patients' role in scientific writing: insights from a global participatory approach with people with multiple sclerosis.增强患者在科学写作中的作用:来自与多发性硬化症患者的全球参与式方法的见解。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Feb 24;11(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00687-2.
9
Identifying barriers and potential solutions to improve equitable access to community eye services: an exploratory sequential mixed methods study protocol.识别改善社区眼科服务公平可及性的障碍和潜在解决方案:一项探索性序贯混合方法研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 23;15(1):e082975. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082975.
10
Community perspectives on barriers to injury care in Northern Malawi: a three delays framed assessment using focus groups and photovoice.马拉维北部社区对伤害护理障碍的看法:使用焦点小组和影像声音的三重延迟框架评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 12;24(1):1382. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11890-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Court reporters: a viable solution for the challenges of focus group data collection?法庭速记员:焦点小组数据收集挑战的可行解决方案?
Qual Health Res. 2009 Jan;19(1):140-6. doi: 10.1177/1049732308327883.
2
Analyzing focus group interviews.分析焦点小组访谈。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2006 Sep-Oct;33(5):478-81. doi: 10.1097/00152192-200609000-00004.
3
Mind-mapped care plans: integrating an innovative educational tool as an alternative to traditional care plans.
J Nurs Educ. 2006 Apr;45(4):112-9. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20060401-04.
4
Is verbatim transcription of interview data always necessary?访谈数据的逐字转录总是必要的吗?
Appl Nurs Res. 2006 Feb;19(1):38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2005.06.001.
5
Understanding the workplace culture of a special care nursery.了解特殊护理托儿所的工作场所文化。
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Apr;50(1):27-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03346.x.
6
The qualities and skills of practice developers.实践开发者的素质与技能。
Nurs Stand. 2002;16(50):33-6. doi: 10.7748/ns2002.08.16.50.33.c3256.
7
Joining mind mapping and care planning to enhance student critical thinking and achieve holistic nursing care.结合思维导图与护理计划以增强学生的批判性思维并实现整体护理。
Nurs Diagn. 2002 Jan-Mar;13(1):24-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618x.2002.tb00161.x.
8
Focus groups as a research method: a critique of some aspects of their use in nursing research.焦点小组作为一种研究方法:对其在护理研究中应用某些方面的批判。
J Adv Nurs. 2001 Mar;33(6):798-805. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01720.x.
9
Qualitative methods for assessing health care.评估医疗保健的定性方法。
Qual Health Care. 1994 Jun;3(2):107-13. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.2.107.
10
What is participatory research?什么是参与式研究?
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Dec;41(12):1667-76. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-s.