Suppr超能文献

运用思维导图技术进行公众参与过程中的快速定性数据分析。

Using mind mapping techniques for rapid qualitative data analysis in public participation processes.

机构信息

Public Health Department, NHS Stockport, Stockport Deputy Director of Public Health, NHS Stockport, Stockport, UK. jilla.burgess-allen@nhsstock

出版信息

Health Expect. 2010 Dec;13(4):406-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00594.x.

Abstract

CONTEXT

In a health service environment where timescales for patient participation in service design are short and resources scarce, a balance needs to be achieved between research rigour and the timeliness and utility of the findings of patient participation processes.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a pragmatic mind mapping approach to managing the qualitative data from patient participation processes.

DESIGN

While this article draws on experience of using mind maps in a variety of participation processes, a single example is used to illustrate the approach. In this example mind maps were created during the course of patient participation focus groups. Two group discussions were also transcribed verbatim to allow comparison of the rapid mind mapping approach with traditional thematic analysis of qualitative data.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

The illustrative example formed part of a local alcohol service review which included consultation with local alcohol service users, their families and staff groups.

FINDINGS

The mind mapping approach provided a pleasing graphical format for representing the key themes raised during the focus groups. It helped stimulate and galvanize discussion and keep it on track, enhanced transparency and group ownership of the data analysis process, allowed a rapid dynamic between data collection and feedback, and was considerably faster than traditional methods for the analysis of focus groups, while resulting in similar broad themes.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the use of a mind mapping approach to managing qualitative data can provide a pragmatic resolution of the tension between limited resources and quality in patient participation processes.

摘要

背景

在医疗服务环境中,患者参与服务设计的时间有限,资源稀缺,因此需要在研究的严谨性与患者参与过程的及时性和实用性之间取得平衡。

目的

开发一种实用的思维导图方法来管理患者参与过程的定性数据。

设计

虽然本文借鉴了在各种参与过程中使用思维导图的经验,但仅使用一个示例来说明该方法。在此示例中,思维导图是在患者参与焦点小组过程中创建的。还逐字转录了两次小组讨论,以便将快速思维导图方法与传统的定性数据分析主题分析进行比较。

地点和参与者

该示例形成了当地酒精服务审查的一部分,其中包括与当地酒精服务使用者、他们的家人和工作人员团体的协商。

发现

思维导图方法为突出显示焦点小组中提出的关键主题提供了令人愉悦的图形格式。它有助于激发和激发讨论并使其保持在正轨上,增强了数据分析过程的透明度和小组所有权,允许在数据收集和反馈之间快速动态交互,并且比传统的焦点小组分析方法快得多,同时产生了类似的广泛主题。

结论

这项研究表明,使用思维导图方法来管理定性数据可以为患者参与过程中资源有限与质量之间的紧张关系提供一种实用的解决方案。

相似文献

2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Analyzing focus group interviews.分析焦点小组访谈。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2006 Sep-Oct;33(5):478-81. doi: 10.1097/00152192-200609000-00004.
6
The qualities and skills of practice developers.实践开发者的素质与技能。
Nurs Stand. 2002;16(50):33-6. doi: 10.7748/ns2002.08.16.50.33.c3256.
9
Qualitative methods for assessing health care.评估医疗保健的定性方法。
Qual Health Care. 1994 Jun;3(2):107-13. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.2.107.
10
What is participatory research?什么是参与式研究?
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Dec;41(12):1667-76. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-s.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验