Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMC Public Health. 2010 Jun 15;10:343. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-343.
There are indications of a high prevalence of psychological distress among students in higher education and also that distress increases over the course of study. However, not all studies on student distress controlled for sociodemographic differences and few followed development of distress over an extended period through professional establishment. We investigated if there is an independent effect of time in education and the first two years in the profession on depressive symptoms and mapped change over the period in a national cohort of students.
Data came from LANE, a nation-wide longitudinal panel survey of Swedish nursing students (N = 1700) who responded to annual questionnaires over five years from 2002 to 2007. Depressive symptoms were measured by the Major Depression Inventory and change over time analysed in a linear mixed effects model for repeated measures.
There was a significant change in level of depressive symptoms over time: an increase from the first to later years in education and a decrease to levels similar to baseline after graduation and a year in the profession. The change in symptoms remained significant after adjustment for sociodemographic factors (p < 0.01). Symptom levels differed due to age, gender, household composition and prior nurse assistant training but change over time was similar in all groups. The correlation among the repeated measures, representing within individual correlation over time, varied between 0.44-0.60.
The findings indicate an independent but transitional effect of time in education and professional establishment on depressive symptoms. We think heightened distress over education abates as the graduate accommodates to the profession. Nevertheless, within education, the differences in depressive symptoms associated to demographic factors can help identify student groups more vulnerable to distress. Also, as individual differences in distress seem to persist over time, perhaps students highly distressed in the beginning of education can be helped by awareness among educators of the elevated levels of distress in late education.
有迹象表明,高等教育学生中存在较高的心理困扰发生率,而且困扰会随着学习过程的发展而增加。然而,并非所有关于学生困扰的研究都控制了社会人口统计学差异,而且很少有研究通过专业建立来跟踪困扰在延长时间内的发展。我们调查了教育时间和专业的头两年是否对抑郁症状有独立影响,并在全国范围内的学生队列中绘制了这段时间的变化情况。
数据来自于 LANE,这是一项针对瑞典护理学生的全国性纵向面板调查(N=1700),他们在 2002 年至 2007 年期间每年通过问卷回答。抑郁症状通过 Major Depression Inventory 进行测量,通过线性混合效应模型进行重复测量的时间分析。
抑郁症状的水平随时间发生了显著变化:教育年限的增加导致症状在最初几年有所增加,而毕业后和专业工作一年后,症状水平会下降到与基线相似的水平。在调整了社会人口统计学因素后,这种症状变化仍然具有统计学意义(p<0.01)。症状水平因年龄、性别、家庭组成和之前的护士助理培训而有所不同,但随时间的变化在所有组中相似。重复测量之间的相关性,代表个体随时间的内在相关性,在 0.44-0.60 之间变化。
这些发现表明,教育时间和专业建立对抑郁症状有独立但过渡性的影响。我们认为,随着毕业生适应职业,教育过程中加剧的困扰会减轻。然而,在教育过程中,与人口统计学因素相关的抑郁症状差异可以帮助识别更容易受到困扰的学生群体。此外,由于个体在困扰方面的差异似乎随着时间的推移而持续存在,因此教育开始时高度困扰的学生或许可以通过教育者对教育后期困扰水平的提高的认识而得到帮助。