Department of Clinical Bacteriology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mycoses. 2011 Sep;54(5):e318-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2010.01913.x. Epub 2010 Jun 14.
The use of anti-fungal agents has increased dramatically in recent years and new drugs have been developed. Several methods are available for determinations of their specific biological activities, i.e. the standard method for minimum inhibitory concentration-determination is described in M-38 [Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute document M-38 (CLSI M-38)]. However, alternative methods, such as the E-test, are currently available in Mycology laboratories. The susceptibilities of clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. (n = 29), Fusarium spp. (n = 5), zygomycetes (n = 21) and Schizophyllum (n = 1) were determined for itraconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole, using the CLSI M-38-A broth dilution method and also by the E-test. A good overall agreement (83.7%) between the two methods for all drugs and organisms was observed. Analyses of voriconazole showed a better agreement (93%) between the methods than posaconazole and itraconazole (85% and 74% respectively). Aspergillus spp. were the most susceptible fungi to the anti-fungal agents tested in this study. Posaconazole was the most active drug against filamentous fungi in vitro, followed by itraconazole and voriconazole. The latter (voriconazole) demonstrated no significant in vitro activity against zygomycetes.
近年来,抗真菌药物的使用量急剧增加,并且已经开发出了新的药物。有几种方法可用于测定其特定的生物活性,例如,最小抑菌浓度测定的标准方法在 M-38 [临床和实验室标准协会文件 M-38(CLSI M-38)]中进行了描述。但是,替代方法,如 E 试验,目前在真菌学实验室中可用。使用 CLSI M-38-A 肉汤稀释法和 E 试验,测定了临床分离的曲霉菌属(n = 29)、镰刀菌属(n = 5)、接合菌(n = 21)和裂褶菌(n = 1)对伊曲康唑、伏立康唑和泊沙康唑的敏感性。观察到两种方法在所有药物和生物体之间的总体一致性(83.7%)良好。伏立康唑分析表明,该方法之间的一致性(93%)优于泊沙康唑和伊曲康唑(分别为 85%和 74%)。在本研究中,曲霉菌属是对抗真菌药物最敏感的真菌。泊沙康唑是体外丝状真菌最有效的药物,其次是伊曲康唑和伏立康唑。后者(伏立康唑)对接合菌没有明显的体外活性。