Suppr超能文献

关于抄袭态度问卷的构建与验证

Construction and validation of attitudes toward plagiarism questionnaire.

作者信息

Mavrinac Martina, Brumini Gordana, Bilić-Zulle Lidija, Petrovecki Mladen

机构信息

Department of Medical Informatics, Rijeka University School of Medicine, B. Branchetta St. 20, 51 000 Rijeka, Croatia.

出版信息

Croat Med J. 2010 Jun;51(3):195-201. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2010.51.195.

Abstract

AIM

To develop and test the psychometric characteristics of a questionnaire measuring attitudes toward plagiarism.

METHODS

Participants were 227 undergraduates and graduate students (128 women and 99 men) from three Croatian universities, with a median age of 21 years (range 18 to 48). Research was conducted from March to June 2009. For the purpose of construction of the first version of the questionnaire, 67 statements (items) were developed. The statements were based on the relevant literature and were developed following rules and recommendations for questionnaire writing, and 36 items were chosen for final validation. Factor analysis was used to find out the factor structure of the questionnaire and to measure construct validity.

RESULTS

The final version of the questionnaire consisted of 29 items divided into a three-factor structure: factor I - positive attitude toward plagiarism (12 items); factor II - negative attitude toward plagiarism (7 items); and factor III - subjective norms toward plagiarism (10 items). Cronbach alpha was calculated to confirm the reliability of the scale: factor I - alpha=0.83; factor II - alpha=0.79; and factor III - alpha=0.85. Correlations between factors were: -0.37 between I and II, -0.41 between I and III, and +0.31 between II and III.

CONCLUSION

Attitudes Toward Plagiarism questionnaire was developed, with good psychometric characteristics. It will be used in future research as a standardized tool for measuring attitudes toward plagiarism.

摘要

目的

编制并检验一份测量对剽窃态度的问卷的心理测量学特征。

方法

参与者为来自克罗地亚三所大学的227名本科生和研究生(128名女性和99名男性),年龄中位数为21岁(范围18至48岁)。研究于2009年3月至6月进行。为构建问卷的第一版,编制了67条陈述(条目)。这些陈述基于相关文献,并按照问卷编写的规则和建议编制,最终选取36个条目进行验证。采用因子分析来探究问卷的因子结构并测量结构效度。

结果

问卷的最终版本由29个条目组成,分为三因子结构:因子I - 对剽窃的积极态度(12个条目);因子II - 对剽窃的消极态度(7个条目);因子III - 对剽窃的主观规范(10个条目)。计算克朗巴哈系数以确认量表的信度:因子I - α = 0.83;因子II - α = 0.79;因子III - α = 0.85。各因子之间的相关性为:I与II之间为 -0.37,I与III之间为 -0.41,II与III之间为 +0.31。

结论

编制了《对剽窃的态度问卷》,具有良好的心理测量学特征。它将在未来研究中用作测量对剽窃态度的标准化工具。

相似文献

6
Attitudes towards plagiarism among academics of the faculty of Medicine of Tunis.突尼斯医学院学者对剽窃的态度。
Account Res. 2020 Nov;27(8):521-537. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1780426. Epub 2020 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

9
Plagiarism Perceptions and Attitudes Among Medical Students in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯医学生对抄袭的认知与态度
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2020 Feb;20(1):e77-e82. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2020.20.01.011. Epub 2020 Mar 9.

本文引用的文献

3
Scientific publishing. Plagiarism sleuths.科学出版。剽窃侦探。
Science. 2009 May 22;324(5930):1004-7. doi: 10.1126/science.324_1004.
4
Repairing research integrity.修复研究诚信。
Nature. 2008 Jun 19;453(7198):980-2. doi: 10.1038/453980a.
5
Policing plagiarism.打击剽窃行为。
BMJ. 2007 Nov 10;335(7627):963-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39388.668773.47.
9
Scientists behaving badly.行为不端的科学家。
Nature. 2005 Jun 9;435(7043):737-8. doi: 10.1038/435737a.
10
Ethics and scientific publication.伦理与科学出版。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2005 Jun;29(2):59-74. doi: 10.1152/advan.00056.2004.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验