Pharmacology, St John's Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Clinical Pharmacology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 16;11(6):e046904. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046904.
Though dissertation is mandatory for postgraduates (PG), it is unknown if adequate knowledge on plagiarism exists at that level. Thus, we intended to study the knowledge and attitude towards plagiarism among junior doctors in India.
Cross-sectional study SETTING: PG medical residents and Junior faculty from various teaching institutions across south India.
A total of N=786 doctors filled the questionnaires of which approximately 42.7% were from government medical colleges (GMCs) and the rest from private institutions.
Participants were given a pretested semistructured questionnaire which contained: (1) demographic details; (2) a quiz developed by Indiana University, USA to assess knowledge and (3) Attitudes towards Plagiarism Questionnaire (ATPQ).
The Primary outcome measure was knowledge about plagiarism. The secondary outcome measure was ATPQ scores.
A total of N=786 resident doctors and junior faculty from across 11 institutions participated in this study. Of this, 42.7% were from GMCs and 60.6% were women. The mean (SD) knowledge score was 4.43 (1.99) out of 10. The factors (adjusted OR; 95% CI; p value) that emerged as significant predictors of knowledge were number of years in profession (-0.181; -0.299 to -0.062; 0.003), no previous publication (0.298; 0.099 to 0.498; 0.003) and working in a GMC (0.400; 0.106 to 0.694; 0.008). The overall mean (SD) scores of the three attitude components were: Permissive attitudes-37.33 (5.33), critical attitudes -20.32 (4.82) and subjective norms-31.05 (4.58), all of which corresponded to the moderate category.
Participants lacked adequate knowledge on how to avoid plagiarism suggesting a need for a revamp in medical education curriculum in India by incorporating research and publication ethics.
尽管论文是研究生(PG)的必修课,但尚不清楚他们在这方面是否具备足够的学术不端知识。因此,我们旨在研究印度初级医生对学术不端的认知和态度。
横断面研究
来自印度南部不同教学机构的 PG 医学生和初级教员。
共有 786 名医生填写了问卷,其中约 42.7%来自政府医学院(GMC),其余来自私立机构。
参与者填写了一份由美国印第安纳大学编制的半结构式预测试问卷,其中包括:(1)人口统计学详细信息;(2)知识测验;(3)学术不端态度问卷(ATPQ)。
主要结局测量是对学术不端的认知。次要结局测量是 ATPQ 评分。
共有来自 11 家机构的 786 名住院医师和初级教员参加了这项研究。其中,42.7%来自 GMC,60.6%为女性。知识得分的平均值(标准差)为 10 分中的 4.43(1.99)。作为知识的显著预测因素的因素(调整后的 OR;95%CI;p 值)包括从业年限(-0.181;-0.299 至 -0.062;0.003)、无先前发表经历(0.298;0.099 至 0.498;0.003)和在 GMC 工作(0.400;0.106 至 0.694;0.008)。三个态度组成部分的总平均值(标准差)分别为:宽容态度-37.33(5.33)、批判态度-20.32(4.82)和主观规范-31.05(4.58),均属于中等类别。
参与者对如何避免学术不端的知识不足,这表明印度需要对医学教育课程进行改革,纳入研究和出版道德规范。