Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30041, USA.
J Sch Health. 2010 Jun;80(6):280-6; quiz 321-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2010.00502.x.
To determine whether schools with a formal indoor air quality management program were more likely than schools without a formal program to have policies and practices that promote superior indoor air quality.
This study analyzed school-level data from the 2006 School Health Policies and Programs Study, a national study of school health programs and policies at the state, district, and school levels. Using chi-square analyses, the rates of policies and practices that promote indoor air quality were compared between schools with and schools without a formal indoor air quality program.
The findings of this study show that 51.4% of schools had a formal indoor air quality management program, and that those schools were significantly more likely than were schools without a program to have policies and use strategies to promote superior indoor air quality.
These findings suggest that schools with a formal indoor air quality program are more likely support policies and engage in practices that promote superior indoor air quality.
为了确定是否有正式室内空气质量管理计划的学校比没有正式计划的学校更有可能制定和实施促进卓越室内空气质量的政策和做法。
本研究分析了 2006 年学校健康政策和方案研究中的学校层面数据，该研究是对州、地区和学校各级学校健康方案和政策的全国性研究。使用卡方分析，比较了有正式室内空气质量计划和没有正式室内空气质量计划的学校中促进室内空气质量的政策和做法的比率。
本研究的结果表明，51.4%的学校有正式的室内空气质量管理计划，这些学校比没有该计划的学校更有可能制定和实施促进卓越室内空气质量的政策和策略。
这些发现表明，有正式室内空气质量计划的学校更有可能支持促进卓越室内空气质量的政策和做法。
