Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, United States.
Addict Behav. 2010 Oct;35(10):882-9. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.05.006. Epub 2010 Jun 4.
Few empirically-based taxonomies of nonmedical prescription drug misusers have been published. This study used latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify classes of adolescent sedative/anxiolytic misusers.
Interviews assessing substance use, psychiatric symptoms, antisocial traits/behavior, and traumatic life experiences were conducted with 723 Missouri youth in residential care for antisocial behavior. Sedative/anxiolytic misusers (N=247) averaged 15.8 (S.D.=1.1) years of age; a majority were male (83.8%), White (70.0%), and resided in rural/small town areas (53.8%).
LPA yielded a three-class solution. Class 1 (59.1%) was comprised of youth with significantly lower levels of currently distressing psychiatric symptoms, fewer lifetime traumatic experiences, less problematic substance use histories, less frequent antisocial behavior, and less impulsivity than youth in Classes 2 and 3. Class 2 (11.3%) youth had high levels of currently distressing psychiatric symptoms and more frequent antisocial behavior compared to youth in Classes 1 and 3. Class 3 (29.5%) youth evidenced levels of psychiatric and behavioral problems that were intermediate to those of Class 1 and 2 youth. Frequency of sedative/anxiolytic misuse was significantly higher in Classes 2 and 3 compared to Class 1. Members of Class 2 and Class 3 also had the highest levels of psychiatric symptoms for which sedatives/anxiolytics are commonly prescribed. Significant differences between classes were observed across a range of health, mental health, personality, and behavioral variables.
Adolescents who misused prescription sedatives/anxiolytics evidenced significant heterogeneity across measures of psychiatric and behavioral dysfunction. Youth with comparatively high levels of anxiety and depression reported significantly more intensive sedative/anxiolytic misuse than their counterparts and may be at high risk for sedative/anxiolytic abuse and dependence.
目前已发表的非医疗处方药物滥用者的经验主义分类法很少。本研究使用潜在剖面分析(LPA)来识别青少年镇静/抗焦虑药物滥用者的类别。
对密苏里州因反社会行为而被收容在住宿护理机构的 723 名青少年进行了评估物质使用、精神症状、反社会特征/行为和创伤性生活经历的访谈。镇静/抗焦虑药物滥用者(N=247)的平均年龄为 15.8 岁(标准差=1.1);大多数为男性(83.8%),白人(70.0%),居住在农村/小镇地区(53.8%)。
LPA 产生了一个三分类解决方案。第 1 类(59.1%)由目前精神症状明显较轻、生活经历创伤性较少、物质使用史问题较少、反社会行为频率较低且冲动性较低的青少年组成,与第 2 类和第 3 类青少年相比。第 2 类(11.3%)青少年目前有较高水平的精神症状和更频繁的反社会行为与第 1 类和第 3 类青少年相比。第 3 类(29.5%)青少年的精神和行为问题水平处于第 1 类和第 2 类青少年之间。与第 1 类相比,第 2 类和第 3 类青少年的镇静/抗焦虑药物滥用频率明显更高。第 2 类和第 3 类青少年也有最常见的处方镇静剂/抗焦虑药物治疗的精神症状。在一系列健康、心理健康、人格和行为变量方面,各班级之间存在显著差异。
滥用处方镇静剂/抗焦虑药物的青少年在精神和行为功能障碍的衡量标准上表现出显著的异质性。报告有较高水平焦虑和抑郁的青少年比同龄人报告了更频繁的镇静/抗焦虑药物滥用,他们可能面临镇静/抗焦虑药物滥用和依赖的高风险。