Uçtaşli M B, Bala O, Güllü A
Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Gazi, Ankara, Turkey.
J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Dec;31(12):1197-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01341.x.
The aim of this study was to compare surface roughness of flowable (Admira Flow, Filtek Flow, Tetric Flow) and packable (Admira, Filtek P60, Tetric HB) composite resin restorative materials finishing with Sof-Lex discs by means of average surface roughness (Ra) measurement using a surface profilometer and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For each test group five specimens were prepared and roughness was measured in five different positions using a profilometer with a traversing distance of 4 mm and a cut-off value of 0.8 mm. The radius of the tracing diamond tip was 5 microm and measuring force and speed was 4 mN and 0.5 mm/s, respectively. The surface roughness of each individual disk was taken as the arithmetic mean of the Ra values measured in five different positions. Additionally, one specimen of each test group after finishing was observed under SEM with the magnification of x800 and x2500. Before finishing with Sof-Lex discs, flowable composite materials showed a smoother surface than packable composites restoratives (P < 0.05). However, after the finishing procedures similar surface textures were observed both from packable and flowable composites (P > 0.05).
本研究的目的是通过使用表面轮廓仪测量平均表面粗糙度(Ra)以及扫描电子显微镜(SEM),比较可流动型(Admira Flow、Filtek Flow、Tetric Flow)和可压实型(Admira、Filtek P60、Tetric HB)复合树脂修复材料在使用Sof-Lex盘进行修整后的表面粗糙度。对于每个测试组,制备五个样本,并使用行程距离为4 mm、截止值为0.8 mm的轮廓仪在五个不同位置测量粗糙度。跟踪金刚石尖端的半径为5微米,测量力和速度分别为4 mN和0.5 mm/s。每个单独样本的表面粗糙度取在五个不同位置测量的Ra值的算术平均值。此外,每个测试组修整后的一个样本在SEM下以800倍和2500倍放大倍数进行观察。在用Sof-Lex盘进行修整之前,可流动复合材料的表面比可压实复合修复材料更光滑(P < 0.05)。然而,在修整过程之后,可压实和可流动复合材料都观察到了相似的表面纹理(P > 0.05)。