Hirohata M, Abe T, Fujimura N, Takeuchi Y, Morimitsu H, Shigemori M
Department of Neurosurgery, Kurume University Hospital; Kurume, Japan -
Interv Neuroradiol. 2004 Dec 24;10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):49-53. doi: 10.1177/15910199040100S210. Epub 2008 May 15.
The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate clinical results in patients with acutely ruptured cerebral aneurysm treated by neck clipping (NC) or coil embolization (CE) when CE was considered the first option. Between 1998 and 2003, 280 patients with acutely ruptured cerebral aneurysms excluding intracerebral hematoma were evaluated. Patients were managed prospectively according to the following protocol: primary treatment modality was CE (n=179). NC (n=101) was selected for the patients with aneurysms that were small (less than 2 mm) or an unsuitable shape for CE. Surgical complication rates were 4.5% for CE and 16.8% for NC. Symptomatic vasospasm occurred in 8.4% of CE patients and 29% of NC patients. Good recovery on the Glasgow Outcome Scale was achieved by 71% of CE patients and 50% of NC patients at discharge. Surgical complications and symptomatic vasospasm were significantly reduced in CE compared to NC. Clinical outcome at discharge was also better with CE. Although 18.3% of CE patients showed various degrees of aneurysmal recanalization and 7% of CE patients required additional treatment (re-CE or NC), aneurysmal rebleeding occurred in only one patient during followup (mean, 3.95 years).
这项前瞻性研究的目的是评估在将线圈栓塞(CE)视为首选方案时,采用颈部夹闭术(NC)或线圈栓塞术(CE)治疗急性破裂脑动脉瘤患者的临床结果。1998年至2003年期间,对280例排除脑内血肿的急性破裂脑动脉瘤患者进行了评估。患者按照以下方案进行前瞻性管理:主要治疗方式为CE(n = 179)。对于动脉瘤较小(小于2 mm)或形状不适合CE的患者,选择NC(n = 101)。CE的手术并发症发生率为4.5%,NC为16.8%。有症状的血管痉挛在CE患者中发生率为8.4%,在NC患者中为29%。出院时,71%的CE患者和50%的NC患者在格拉斯哥预后量表上实现了良好恢复。与NC相比,CE的手术并发症和有症状的血管痉挛明显减少。CE患者出院时的临床结果也更好。尽管18.3%的CE患者出现了不同程度的动脉瘤再通,7%的CE患者需要额外治疗(再次CE或NC),但随访期间(平均3.95年)仅有1例患者发生动脉瘤再出血。