• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

团队协作动态

Team coordination dynamics.

作者信息

Gorman Jamie C, Amazeen Polemnia G, Cooke Nancy J

机构信息

Arizona State University, USA.

出版信息

Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2010 Jul;14(3):265-89.

PMID:20587302
Abstract

Team coordination consists of both the dynamics of team member interaction and the environmental dynamics to which a team is subjected. Focusing on dynamics, an approach is developed that contrasts with traditional aggregate-static concepts of team coordination as characterized by the shared mental model approach. A team coordination order parameter was developed to capture momentary fluctuations in coordination. Team coordination was observed in three-person uninhabited air vehicle teams across two experimental sessions. The dynamics of the order parameter were observed under changes of a team familiarity control parameter. Team members returned for the second session to either the same (Intact) or different (Mixed) team. 'Roadblock' perturbations, or novel changes in the task environment, were introduced in order to probe the stability of team coordination. Nonlinear dynamic methods revealed differences that a traditional approach did not: Intact and Mixed team coordination dynamics looked very different; Mixed teams were more stable than Intact teams and explored the space of solutions without the need for correction. Stability was positively correlated with the number of roadblock perturbations that were overcome successfully. The novel and non-intuitive contribution of a dynamical analysis was that Mixed teams, who did not have a long history working together, were more adaptive. Team coordination dynamics carries new implications for traditional problems such as training adaptive teams.

摘要

团队协作既包括团队成员互动的动态过程,也包括团队所处的环境动态。着眼于动态过程,开发了一种与以共享心智模型方法为特征的传统总体静态团队协作概念形成对比的方法。开发了一个团队协作序参量来捕捉协作中的瞬间波动。在两个实验环节中,对三人无人飞行器团队的团队协作进行了观察。在团队熟悉度控制参量变化的情况下,观察序参量的动态变化。团队成员在第二个环节返回原团队(完整团队)或加入不同团队(混合团队)。引入“路障”干扰,即任务环境中的新变化,以探究团队协作的稳定性。非线性动力学方法揭示了传统方法未发现的差异:完整团队和混合团队的协作动态看起来非常不同;混合团队比完整团队更稳定,且无需修正就能探索解决方案空间。稳定性与成功克服的路障干扰数量呈正相关。动力学分析的新颖且非直观的贡献在于,没有长期合作历史的混合团队更具适应性。团队协作动态对诸如训练适应性团队等传统问题具有新的启示。

相似文献

1
Team coordination dynamics.团队协作动态
Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2010 Jul;14(3):265-89.
2
Origins of group coordination: nonlinear dynamics and the role of verbalization.群体协调的起源:非线性动力学与言语表达的作用
Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2005 Apr;9(2):175-207.
3
Team cognition in experienced command-and-control teams.经验丰富的指挥控制团队中的团队认知。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2007 Sep;13(3):146-57. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.13.3.146.
4
[Dynamic paradigm in psychopathology: "chaos theory", from physics to psychiatry].[精神病理学中的动态范式:“混沌理论”,从物理学到精神病学]
Encephale. 2001 May-Jun;27(3):260-8.
5
Multi-team dynamics and distributed expertise in imission operations.介入手术操作中的多团队动态与分布式专业知识
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005 Jun;76(6 Suppl):B145-53.
6
Assessing the performance of surgical teams.评估手术团队的表现。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2009 Jan-Mar;34(1):29-41. doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000342977.84307.64.
7
Coordination patterns related to high clinical performance in a simulated anesthetic crisis.与模拟麻醉危机中的高临床绩效相关的协调模式
Anesth Analg. 2009 May;108(5):1606-15. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181981d36.
8
On the utility of experiential cross-training for team decision-making under time stress.关于时间压力下经验交叉培训对团队决策的效用
Ergonomics. 2000 Aug;43(8):1095-110. doi: 10.1080/00140130050084897.
9
Changes in team cognition after a retention interval: the benefits of mixing it up.保留间隔后团队认知的变化:混合的好处。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2011 Dec;17(4):303-19. doi: 10.1037/a0025149. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
10
Interpersonal pattern dynamics and adaptive behavior in multiagent neurobiological systems: conceptual model and data.多智能体神经生物学系统中的人际模式动态与适应性行为:概念模型与数据
J Mot Behav. 2009 Oct;41(5):445-59. doi: 10.3200/35-08-061.

引用本文的文献

1
The dynamics of leadership and success in software development teams.软件开发团队中的领导力与成功动态
Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 27;16(1):3956. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59031-7.
2
A Holistic Analysis of Team Dynamics Using Relational Coordination as the Measure regarding Student Athlete Total Load: A Cross-Sectional Study.以关系协调为衡量标准对学生运动员总负荷的团队动态进行整体分析:一项横断面研究。
Sports (Basel). 2023 May 13;11(5):104. doi: 10.3390/sports11050104.
3
From Teams to Teamness: Future Directions in the Science of Team Cognition.
从团队到团队精神:团队认知科学的未来方向。
Hum Factors. 2024 Jun;66(6):1669-1680. doi: 10.1177/00187208231162449. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
4
Exploring how healthcare teams balance the neurodynamics of autonomous and collaborative behaviors: a proof of concept.探索医疗团队如何平衡自主行为与协作行为的神经动力学:概念验证
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 28;16:932468. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.932468. eCollection 2022.
5
Degeneracy and Complexity in Neuro-Behavioral Correlates of Team Coordination.团队协作神经行为关联中的简并性与复杂性
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Sep 10;14:328. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00328. eCollection 2020.
6
Transitions in persistence of postural dynamics depend on the velocity and structure of postural perturbations.姿势动力学持续性的转变取决于姿势扰动的速度和结构。
Exp Brain Res. 2018 May;236(5):1491-1500. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5235-1. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
7
Understanding and Modeling Teams As Dynamical Systems.将团队理解为动态系统并进行建模。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 11;8:1053. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01053. eCollection 2017.
8
Coordination and Collective Performance: Cooperative Goals Boost Interpersonal Synchrony and Task Outcomes.协调与集体表现:合作目标促进人际同步与任务成果。
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 27;7:1462. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01462. eCollection 2016.
9
Evidence for a Creative Dilemma Posed by Repeated Collaborations.重复合作带来的创造性困境的证据。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 4;10(9):e0137418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137418. eCollection 2015.
10
Experimental control of scaling behavior: what is not fractal?标度行为的实验控制:什么不是分形的?
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Oct;233(10):2813-21. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4351-4. Epub 2015 Jun 13.