• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

软件开发团队中的领导力与成功动态

The dynamics of leadership and success in software development teams.

作者信息

Betti Lorenzo, Gallo Luca, Wachs Johannes, Battiston Federico

机构信息

Department of Network and Data Science, Central European University, Vienna, Austria.

ANETI Lab, Corvinus Institute for Advanced Studies (CIAS), Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 27;16(1):3956. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59031-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-025-59031-7
PMID:40289151
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12034773/
Abstract

From science to industry, teamwork plays a crucial role in knowledge production and innovation. Most studies consider teams as static groups of individuals, thereby failing to capture how the micro-dynamics of collaborative processes and organizational changes determine team success. Here, we leverage fine-grained temporal data on software development teams from three software ecosystems - Rust, JavaScript, and Python - to gain insights into the dynamics of online collaborative projects. Our analysis reveals an uneven workload distribution in teams, with stronger heterogeneity correlated with higher success, and the early emergence of a lead developer carrying out the majority of work. Moreover, we find that a sizeable fraction of projects experience a change of lead developer, with such a transition being more likely in projects led by inexperienced users. Finally, we show that leadership change is associated with faster success growth. Our work contributes to a deeper understanding of the link between team evolution and success in collaborative processes.

摘要

从科学领域到工业界,团队合作在知识生产和创新中发挥着至关重要的作用。大多数研究将团队视为个体的静态组合,因此未能捕捉到协作过程和组织变革的微观动态如何决定团队的成功。在此,我们利用来自Rust、JavaScript和Python这三个软件生态系统的软件开发团队的细粒度时间数据,以深入了解在线协作项目的动态。我们的分析揭示了团队中工作量分布不均的情况,更强的异质性与更高的成功率相关,并且早期会出现承担大部分工作的主导开发者。此外,我们发现相当一部分项目会经历主导开发者的变更,这种转变在由经验不足的用户主导的项目中更有可能发生。最后,我们表明领导力的变化与更快的成功增长相关。我们的工作有助于更深入地理解团队演变与协作过程中的成功之间的联系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5929/12034773/505de55c76c6/41467_2025_59031_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5929/12034773/008b402334cd/41467_2025_59031_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5929/12034773/742c5e2f39dc/41467_2025_59031_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5929/12034773/8a0d99fe3cac/41467_2025_59031_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5929/12034773/505de55c76c6/41467_2025_59031_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5929/12034773/008b402334cd/41467_2025_59031_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5929/12034773/742c5e2f39dc/41467_2025_59031_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5929/12034773/8a0d99fe3cac/41467_2025_59031_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5929/12034773/505de55c76c6/41467_2025_59031_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The dynamics of leadership and success in software development teams.软件开发团队中的领导力与成功动态
Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 27;16(1):3956. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59031-7.
2
Coaching and leadership for the diffusion of innovation in health care: a different type of multi-organization improvement collaborative.医疗保健领域创新传播的指导与领导力:一种不同类型的多组织改进协作
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Feb;28(2):55-71. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28006-2.
3
Understanding the group dynamics and success of teams.了解团队的群体动态和成功。
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Apr 6;3(4):160007. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160007. eCollection 2016 Apr.
4
Interprofessional teamwork in healthcare: Observations and the road ahead.医疗保健中的跨专业团队合作:观察与未来之路。
J Interprof Care. 2023 May-Jun;37(3):338-345. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2022.2090526. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
5
Collaborative interdepartmental teams: benefits, challenges, alternatives, and the ingredients for team success.协作跨部门团队:优势、挑战、替代方案以及团队成功的要素。
Clin Imaging. 2021 Jan;69:301-304. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
6
Interprofessional team member's satisfaction: a mixed methods study of a Chilean hospital.跨专业团队成员的满意度:智利一家医院的混合方法研究。
Hum Resour Health. 2018 Jul 11;16(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12960-018-0290-z.
7
Do learning collaboratives strengthen communication? A comparison of organizational team communication networks over time.学习协作是否能增强沟通?组织团队沟通网络随时间的比较。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2018 Jan/Mar;43(1):50-60. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000120.
8
Boundary work in knowledge teams.知识团队中的边界工作。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 May;94(3):604-17. doi: 10.1037/a0014367.
9
The Emergence of Shared Leadership in Innovation Labs.创新实验室中共享领导力的出现。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 12;12:685167. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685167. eCollection 2021.
10
There is no "I" in team: Implications for academic radiology.团队中没有“我”:对学术放射学的启示。
Clin Imaging. 2025 Mar;119:110411. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110411. Epub 2025 Jan 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Collective dynamics behind success.成功背后的集体动力。
Nat Commun. 2024 Dec 19;15(1):10701. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54612-4.
2
Network structure shapes the impact of diversity in collective learning.网络结构塑造了多样性在集体学习中的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 30;14(1):2491. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52837-3.
3
Beyond collective intelligence: Collective adaptation.超越集体智慧:集体适应。
J R Soc Interface. 2023 Mar;20(200):20220736. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0736. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
4
Evolving collaboration, dependencies, and use in the Rust Open Source Software ecosystem.Rust 开源软件生态系统中的协作、依赖关系和使用方式的演变。
Sci Data. 2022 Nov 16;9(1):703. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01819-z.
5
The network science of collective intelligence.集体智慧的网络科学。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Nov;26(11):923-941. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.08.009. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
6
Gender-diverse teams produce more novel and higher-impact scientific ideas.性别多样化的团队能产生更多新颖且影响深远的科学理念。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Sep 6;119(36):e2200841119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2200841119. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
7
The anatomy of social dynamics in escape rooms.密室逃脱中的社会动态解剖。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 22;12(1):10498. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13929-0.
8
Analysing Time-Stamped Co-Editing Networks in Software Development Teams using git2net.使用git2net分析软件开发团队中的时间戳协同编辑网络。
Empir Softw Eng. 2021;26(4):75. doi: 10.1007/s10664-020-09928-2. Epub 2021 May 26.
9
Task complexity moderates group synergy.任务复杂性调节群体协同作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Sep 7;118(36). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2101062118.
10
Fresh teams are associated with original and multidisciplinary research.新鲜的团队与原创和多学科研究有关。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Oct;5(10):1314-1322. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01084-x. Epub 2021 Apr 5.