Suppr超能文献

双相 I 型和 II 型障碍之间的脑白质异常的差异。

Differences in white matter abnormalities between bipolar I and II disorders.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2010 Dec;127(1-3):309-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.05.026. Epub 2010 Jul 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although patients with bipolar I and II disorders exhibit heterogeneous clinical presentations and cognitive functions, it remains unclear whether these two subtypes have distinct neural substrates. This study aimed to differentiate the fiber abnormalities between bipolar I and II patients using diffusion tensor images.

METHOD

Fourteen bipolar I patients, thirteen bipolar II patients, and twenty-one healthy subjects were recruited. Fractional anisotropy (FA) values calculated from diffusion tensor images were compared among groups using two-sample t-test analysis in a voxel-wise manner. Correlations between the mean FA value of each survived area and the clinical characteristics as well as the scores of neuropsychological tests were further analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients of both subtypes manifested fiber impairments in the thalamus, anterior cingulate, and inferior frontal areas, whereas the bipolar II patients showed more fiber alterations in the temporal and inferior prefrontal regions. The FA values of the subgenual anterior cingulate cortices for both subtypes correlated with the performance of working memory. The FA values of the right inferior frontal area of bipolar I and the left middle temporal area of bipolar II both correlated with executive function. For bipolar II patients, the left middle temporal and inferior prefrontal FA values correlated with the scores of YMRS and hypomanic episodes, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest distinct neuropathological substrates between bipolar I and II subtypes. The fiber alterations observed in the bipolar I patients were majorly associated with cognitive dysfunction, whereas those in the bipolar II patients were related to both cognitive and emotional processing.

摘要

背景

尽管双相情感障碍 I 型和 II 型患者表现出不同的临床特征和认知功能,但这两种亚型是否具有不同的神经基础仍不清楚。本研究旨在使用弥散张量成像来区分双相 I 型和 II 型患者的纤维异常。

方法

共招募了 14 名双相 I 型患者、13 名双相 II 型患者和 21 名健康对照者。采用两样本 t 检验分析方法,以体素为单位比较各组弥散张量图像计算的各向异性分数(FA)值。进一步分析各存活区的平均 FA 值与临床特征以及神经心理学测试评分之间的相关性。

结果

两种亚型的患者均表现出丘脑、前扣带回和额下回区域的纤维损伤,而双相 II 型患者在颞叶和额下回前部区域显示出更多的纤维改变。两种亚型的扣带回前下角的 FA 值与工作记忆的表现相关。双相 I 型的右侧额下回和双相 II 型的左侧颞中回的 FA 值均与执行功能相关。对于双相 II 型患者,左颞中回和下回的 FA 值分别与 YMRS 评分和轻躁狂发作次数相关。

结论

我们的发现表明双相 I 型和 II 型亚型之间存在不同的神经病理学基础。双相 I 型患者的纤维改变主要与认知功能障碍有关,而双相 II 型患者的纤维改变与认知和情感处理均有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验