Delmelle Eric M, Goovaerts Pierre
Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, and Center for Applied Geographic Information Systems, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, U.S.A.
Geoderma. 2009 Oct 15;153(1-2):205-216. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.08.007.
In spatial sampling, once initial samples of the primary variable have been collected, it is possible to take additional measurements, an approach known as second-phase sampling. Additional samples are usually collected away from observation locations, or where the kriging variance is maximum. However, the kriging variance (also known as prediction error variance) is independent of data values and computed under the assumption of stationary spatial process, which is often violated in practice. In this paper, we weight the kriging variance with another criterion, giving greater sampling importance to locations exhibiting significant spatial roughness that is computed by a spatial moving average window. Additional samples are allocated using a simulated annealing procedure since the weighted objective function is non-linear. A case study using an exhaustive remote sensing image illustrates the procedure. Combinations of first-phase systematic and nested sampling designs (or patterns) of varying densities are generated, while the location of additional observations is guided in a way which optimizes the proposed objective function. The true pixel value at the new points is extracted, the semivariogram model updated, and the image reconstructed. Second-phase sampling patterns optimizing the proposed criterion lead to predictions closer to the true image than when using the kriging variance as the main criterion. This improvement is stronger when there is a low density of first-phase samples, and decreases however as the initial density increases.
在空间采样中,一旦收集到主要变量的初始样本,就可以进行额外的测量,这种方法称为第二阶段采样。额外的样本通常在远离观测位置的地方或克里金方差最大的地方收集。然而,克里金方差(也称为预测误差方差)与数据值无关,并且是在平稳空间过程的假设下计算的,而这在实际中常常不成立。在本文中,我们用另一个标准对克里金方差进行加权,赋予通过空间移动平均窗口计算出的具有显著空间粗糙度的位置更大的采样重要性。由于加权目标函数是非线性的,因此使用模拟退火程序来分配额外的样本。一个使用详尽遥感图像的案例研究说明了该过程。生成了不同密度的第一阶段系统采样和嵌套采样设计(或模式)的组合,同时以优化所提出的目标函数的方式来指导额外观测的位置。提取新点处的真实像素值,更新半变异函数模型,并重建图像。与将克里金方差作为主要标准时相比,优化所提出标准的第二阶段采样模式能使预测结果更接近真实图像。当第一阶段样本密度较低时,这种改进更为明显,但随着初始密度的增加而减小。