Department of Pediatric Neurology, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.
Mov Disord. 2010 Jul 15;25(9):1262-8. doi: 10.1002/mds.23129.
We assessed the clinical outcome after coenzyme Q(10) (CoQ(10)) therapy in 14 patients presenting ataxia classified into two groups according to CoQ(10) values in muscle (deficient or not). We performed an open-label prospective study: patients were evaluated clinically (international cooperative ataxia rating scale [ICARS] scale, MRI, and videotape registration) at baseline and every 6 months during a period of 2 years after CoQ(10) treatment (30 mg/kg/day). Patients with CoQ(10) deficiency showed a statistically significant reduction of ICARS scores (Wilcoxon test: P = 0.018) after 2 years of CoQ(10) treatment when compared with baseline conditions. In patients without CoQ(10) deficiency, no statistically significant differences were observed in total ICARS scores after therapy, although 1 patient from this group showed a remarkable clinical amelioration. Biochemical diagnosis of CoQ(10) deficiency was a useful tool for the selection of patients who are good candidates for treatment as all of them responded to therapy. However, the remarkable clinical response in 1 case without CoQ(10) deficiency highlights the importance of treatment trials for identification of patients with CoQ(10)-responsive ataxia.
我们评估了辅酶 Q(10)(CoQ(10))治疗后出现共济失调的 14 名患者的临床结局,这些患者根据肌肉中的 CoQ(10)值(缺乏或不缺乏)分为两组。我们进行了一项开放标签的前瞻性研究:患者在基线时和 CoQ(10)治疗后 2 年内的每 6 个月(30 mg/kg/天)进行临床评估(国际合作共济失调评分量表[ICARS]量表、MRI 和录像带记录)。CoQ(10)缺乏的患者在 2 年的 CoQ(10)治疗后,ICARS 评分有统计学意义的降低(Wilcoxon 检验:P = 0.018)与基线条件相比。在 CoQ(10)不缺乏的患者中,治疗后总 ICARS 评分无统计学差异,但该组中有 1 例患者的临床改善显著。CoQ(10)缺乏的生化诊断是选择治疗候选者的有用工具,因为所有患者均对治疗有反应。然而,1 例 CoQ(10)不缺乏的患者出现显著的临床反应,突出了治疗试验对于识别 CoQ(10)反应性共济失调患者的重要性。