Cognitive Psychopathology and Neuropsychology Unit, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2010 Oct;20(5):778-97. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2010.495245. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
The aim of the study was to develop and validate a short questionnaire assessing four dimensions of impulsivity (urgency, lack of premeditation, lack of perseverance, sensation seeking) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). To this end, 82 patients with TBI and their caregivers completed a short questionnaire adapted from the UPPS Impulsive Behavior Scale designed to assess impulsivity changes after TBI. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) performed on the version of the scale completed by the relatives revealed that a hierarchical model holding that lack of premeditation and lack of perseverance are facets of a higher order construct (lack of conscientiousness), with urgency and sensation seeking as separate correlated factors, fit the data best. Urgency, lack of premeditation, and lack of perseverance increased after the TBI, whereas sensation seeking decreased. CFA failed to reveal a satisfactory model in the version of the scale completed by the patients. The psychological processes related to these impulsivity changes and the discrepancy observed between self-report and informant-report are discussed. This short questionnaire opens up interesting prospects for better comprehension and assessment of behavioural symptoms of TBI.
本研究旨在开发和验证一个简短的问卷,用于评估创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的冲动性的四个维度(冲动、缺乏预谋、缺乏毅力、寻求刺激)。为此,82 名 TBI 患者及其照顾者完成了一个简短的问卷,该问卷改编自 UPPS 冲动行为量表,旨在评估 TBI 后冲动性的变化。对亲属完成的量表版本进行的验证性因素分析(CFAs)表明,一个层次模型认为缺乏预谋和缺乏毅力是更高阶结构(缺乏尽责性)的方面,而冲动和寻求刺激则是单独相关的因素,最符合数据。在 TBI 后,冲动、缺乏预谋和缺乏毅力增加,而寻求刺激减少。在患者完成的量表版本中,CFA 未能显示出令人满意的模型。讨论了与这些冲动性变化相关的心理过程以及自我报告和知情者报告之间观察到的差异。这个简短的问卷为更好地理解和评估 TBI 的行为症状提供了有趣的前景。