Borghi J, Sabina N, Ronsmans C, Killewo J
Health Policy Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
J Health Popul Nutr. 2010 Jun;28(3):286-93. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v28i3.5558.
This study compared the costs of providing antenatal, delivery and postnatal care in the home and in a basic obstetric facility in rural Bangladesh. The average costs were estimated by interviewing midwives and from institutional records. The main determinants of cost in each setting were also assessed. The cost of basic obstetric care in the home and in a facility was very similar, although care in the home was cheaper. Deliveries in the home took more time but this was offset by the capital costs associated with facility-based care. As use-rates increase, deliveries in a facility will become cheaper. Antenatal and postnatal care was much cheaper to provide in the facility than in the home. Facility-based delivery care is likely to be a cheaper and more feasible method for the care provider as demand rises. In settings where skilled attendance rates are very low, home-based care will be cheaper.
本研究比较了在孟加拉国农村地区家中以及基本产科机构中提供产前、分娩和产后护理的成本。通过采访助产士并参考机构记录来估算平均成本。同时还评估了每种情况下成本的主要决定因素。在家中和机构中进行基本产科护理的成本非常相似,不过在家中护理更便宜。在家中分娩耗时更长,但这被基于机构护理的资本成本所抵消。随着使用率的增加,在机构中分娩会变得更便宜。在机构中提供产前和产后护理比在家中便宜得多。随着需求上升,对于护理提供者而言,基于机构的分娩护理可能是一种更便宜且更可行的方法。在熟练接生率非常低的地区,在家中护理会更便宜。