热线式肺活量计的效用。

Utility of the hot-wire spirometer.

作者信息

Nozu Y, Yu M H, Tatsumi M, Tsunoda H

机构信息

Faculty of Education, Akita University.

出版信息

Ann Physiol Anthropol. 1991 Apr;10(2):77-82. doi: 10.2114/ahs1983.10.77.

DOI:10.2114/ahs1983.10.77

PMID:2064684

Abstract

A comparative study has been carried out to investigate the performance of the hot-wire spirometer and the Rollingseal spirometer; the reproducibility of the data generated by an individual examiner; and the validity of data obtained by an "inexperienced examiner" using the hot-wire spirometer. The following results were obtained: 1. The experimental data given by the hot-wire spirometer were about 5-6% higher for FVC and FEV1, and about 10-12% higher for PFR, V50, and V25, respectively, when compared to the data generated by the Rollingseal spirometer. 2. The reproducibility of the data produced by the hot-wire spirometer operated by an "experienced examiner" was good, as the percent difference was about +/- 3%. 3. Reliable data were obtained with the spirometer even by an "inexperienced examiner" if he/she has gone through an on-site training concerning instrumentation and measurement methods for spirography.

摘要

已开展一项对比研究，以调查热线式肺活量计和滚动密封式肺活量计的性能；单个检查者生成数据的可重复性；以及“经验不足的检查者”使用热线式肺活量计获得数据的有效性。获得了以下结果：1. 与滚动密封式肺活量计生成的数据相比，热线式肺活量计给出的实验数据中，用力肺活量（FVC）和第一秒用力呼气量（FEV1）分别高出约5 - 6%，峰值呼气流速（PFR）、50%肺活量时的瞬间呼气流量（V50）和25%肺活量时的瞬间呼气流量（V25）分别高出约10 - 12%。2. 由“经验丰富的检查者”操作的热线式肺活量计所产生数据的可重复性良好，因为百分比差异约为±3%。3. 如果“经验不足的检查者”接受过有关肺量计仪器和测量方法的现场培训，使用该肺活量计也能获得可靠的数据。