Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Sep 1;51(5):600-8. doi: 10.1086/655762.
Laboratory monitoring for toxicity among patients receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) in less-developed settings is technically challenging and consumes significant resources.
We conducted a cohort study of the 1800 adult patients who initiated ART at the Haitian Study Group for Kaposi's Sarcoma and Opportunistic Infections (GHESKIO) in Haiti from 2003 to 2006, using baseline data to establish the prevalence and using follow-up data to establish the incidence of hepatitis, renal insufficiency, hyperglycemia, anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. We determined how frequently routine (not symptom-driven) testing detected significant laboratory abnormalities and calculated the cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted by detection of these events in the asymptomatic stage, compared with a strategy of symptom-prompted testing only.
Forty-eight patients (3.5%) had severe anemia at baseline testing and consequently did not receive zidovudine. Fifty-three patients receiving zidovudine therapy developed severe anemia during follow-up (incidence, 2.5 cases/100 person-years). Monitoring for asymptomatic anemia with hematocrit testing was cost-saving at baseline and had a cost-effectiveness ratio of US$317/DALY averted during follow-up; with a complete blood count, costs increased to US$1182 and $10,781/DALY averted, respectively. With glucose monitoring, 11 patients were diagnosed with new-onset hyperglycemia during follow-up (incidence, 0.7 cases/100 person-years), resulting in a cost-effectiveness ratio of US$9845 per DALY averted. Monitoring for asymptomatic hepatitis and renal insufficiency was expensive and rarely affected care.
Resource-poor countries should select which laboratory tests to perform on the basis of the cost-effectiveness of each test. This will depend on the national ART drug regimen and the prevalence of other comorbidities. Routine monitoring with multitest hematological and chemistry panels is unlikely to be cost-effective.
在欠发达地区,对接受抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)的患者进行毒性监测在技术上具有挑战性,并且需要消耗大量资源。
我们对 2003 年至 2006 年期间在海地 GHESKIO 艾滋病毒相关卡波西肉瘤和机会性感染海地研究组接受 ART 治疗的 1800 名成年患者进行了队列研究,使用基线数据确定了肝炎、肾功能不全、高血糖、贫血、中性粒细胞减少症和血小板减少症的患病率,并使用随访数据确定了其发病率。我们确定了常规(非症状驱动)检测检测到显著实验室异常的频率,并计算了在无症状阶段检测到这些事件所避免的每例残疾调整生命年(DALY)的成本,与仅基于症状进行检测的策略相比。
48 名患者(3.5%)在基线检测时存在严重贫血,因此未接受齐多夫定治疗。53 名接受齐多夫定治疗的患者在随访期间出现严重贫血(发病率为 2.5 例/100 人年)。使用血细胞比容检测监测无症状性贫血在基线时具有成本效益,且在随访期间每避免 1 例 DALY 的成本效益比为 317 美元;而使用全血细胞计数,成本分别增加到 1182 美元和 10781 美元。通过血糖监测,11 名患者在随访期间被诊断为新发高血糖症(发病率为 0.7 例/100 人年),每避免 1 例 DALY 的成本效益比为 9845 美元。无症状性肝炎和肾功能不全的监测费用昂贵,且很少影响治疗。
资源匮乏的国家应根据每项检测的成本效益来选择要进行的实验室检测。这将取决于国家的 ART 药物方案和其他合并症的流行情况。常规使用多测试血液学和化学面板监测不太可能具有成本效益。