Ang Siewching, Rodgers Joseph Lee, Wänström Linda
Department of Psychology, University of Oklahoma.
Intelligence. 2010 Jul 1;38(4):367-384. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2010.05.004.
Although the Flynn Effect has been studied widely across cultural, geographic, and intellectual domains, and many explanatory theories have been proposed, little past research attention has been paid to subgroup differences. Rodgers and Wänström (2007) identified an aggregate-level Flynn Effect (FE) at each age between 5 and 13 in the Children of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSYC) PIAT-Math data. FE patterns were not obtained for Reading Recognition, Reading Comprehension, or Digit Span, consistent with past FE research suggesting a closer relationship to fluid intelligence measures of problem solving and analytic reasoning than to crystallized measures of verbal comprehension and memory. These prior findings suggest that the NLSYC data can be used as a natural laboratory to study more subtle FE patterns within various demographic subgroups. We test for subgroup Flynn Effect differences by gender, race/ethnicity, maternal education, household income, and urbanization. No subgroups differences emerged for three demographic categories. However, children with more educated (especially college educated) mothers and/or children born into higher income households had an accelerated Flynn effect in their PIAT-M scores compared to cohort peers with lower educated mothers or lower income households. We interpret both the positive and the null findings in relation to previous theoretical explanations.
尽管弗林效应已在文化、地理和智力领域得到广泛研究,并且已经提出了许多解释性理论,但过去很少有研究关注亚组差异。罗杰斯和万斯特伦(2007年)在全国青少年纵向调查(NLSYC)PIAT数学数据中的5至13岁儿童中,确定了每个年龄的总体水平弗林效应(FE)。对于阅读识别、阅读理解或数字广度,未获得弗林效应模式,这与过去的弗林效应研究一致,表明其与解决问题和分析推理的流体智力测量的关系比与言语理解和记忆的晶体测量更密切。这些先前的研究结果表明,NLSYC数据可作为一个自然实验室,用于研究不同人口亚组中更细微的弗林效应模式。我们按性别、种族/族裔、母亲教育程度、家庭收入和城市化程度测试亚组弗林效应差异。在三个人口类别中未出现亚组差异。然而,与母亲受教育程度较低或家庭收入较低的同龄人群体相比,母亲受教育程度较高(尤其是受过大学教育)的儿童和/或出生在高收入家庭的儿童在PIAT - M分数上有加速的弗林效应。我们根据先前的理论解释来解释阳性和阴性结果。