John Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Clin Chim Acta. 2010 Nov 11;411(21-22):1728-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.07.013. Epub 2010 Jul 24.
When creatinine concentrations determined by routine clinical assays are in question, reference methods can aid investigation. Currently available reference methods are significantly labor-intensive, which prevents implementation in a routine clinical laboratory.
Creatinine D-3 internal standard was added to serum prior to chromatographic separation. A TurboFlow Cyclone MCX column was used for online solid phase extraction (SPE) to remove large biomolecules such as proteins, carbohydrates and phospholipids from the serum specimen. Creatinine and creatinine D-3 were then eluted onto a Hypercarb (porous graphitic carbon) column for separation. Analytes were detected using electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry and measured by monitoring parent ions of m/z 114 and 117, respectively.
Total precision at multiple levels was found to be less than 6% (1.0-7.5 mg/dl). Limit of detection (LOD) was 0.05 mg/dl and limit of quantitation (LOQ) was 0.20 mg/dl. Average recovery was 107.5% (0.37-5.95 mg/dl). Analysis of standard reference materials from The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) confirmed accuracy of the method. No significant difference was found between the liquid chromatography-isotope dilution mass spectrometry (LC-IDMS) method and the Roche Creatinine Plus enzymatic assay.
The automated turbulent flow LC-IDMS method for quantitation of serum creatinine is accurate, robust, and easy to perform and may serve as a quick and inexpensive alternative to current creatinine reference methods.
当常规临床检测方法测定的肌酐浓度存在疑问时,参考方法可以辅助进行调查。目前可用的参考方法显著地劳动密集型,这阻止了其在常规临床实验室中的实施。
在色谱分离之前,向血清中添加肌酐 D-3 内标。TurboFlow Cyclone MCX 柱用于在线固相萃取 (SPE),从血清标本中去除大分子物质,如蛋白质、碳水化合物和磷脂。然后将肌酐和肌酐 D-3 洗脱到 Hypercarb(多孔石墨碳)柱上进行分离。通过电喷雾电离串联质谱法检测分析物,并通过分别监测 m/z 114 和 117 的母离子进行测量。
在多个水平发现总精密度小于 6%(1.0-7.5mg/dl)。检测限(LOD)为 0.05mg/dl,定量限(LOQ)为 0.20mg/dl。平均回收率为 107.5%(0.37-5.95mg/dl)。对来自国家标准与技术研究院 (NIST) 的标准参考物质的分析证实了该方法的准确性。与罗氏 Creatinine Plus 酶法相比,未发现液相色谱-同位素稀释质谱法 (LC-IDMS) 方法之间存在显著差异。
用于定量血清肌酐的自动湍流流动 LC-IDMS 方法准确、稳健且易于操作,可能成为当前肌酐参考方法的快速且经济实惠的替代方法。