Department of Aging and Mental Health Disparities, Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida, 13301 Bruce B. Downs Boulevard, MHC 1400, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010 Nov;65(6):684-90. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbq052. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
Given the emphasis on modesty and self-effacement in Asian societies, the present study explored differential item responses for 2 positive affect items (5 = Hopeful and 8 = Happy) on a short form of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale. The samples consisted of elderly non-Hispanic Whites (n = 450), Korean Americans (n = 519), and Koreans (n = 2,030).
Multiple Indicator Multiple Cause models were estimated to identify the impact of group membership on responses to the positive affect items while controlling for the latent trait of depressive symptoms.
The data revealed that Koreans and Korean Americans were less likely than non-Hispanic Whites to endorse the positive affect items. Compared with Korean Americans who were more acculturated to mainstream American culture, those who were less acculturated were less likely to endorse the positive affect items.
Our findings support the notion that the way in which people endorse depressive symptoms is substantially influenced by cultural orientation. These findings call into question the common use of simple mean comparisons and a universal cutoff point across diverse cultural groups.
鉴于亚洲社会强调谦虚和谦逊,本研究探讨了短形式的流行病学研究中心抑郁量表中 2 个积极情绪项目(5=有希望和 8=快乐)的差异项目反应。样本包括非西班牙裔白人老年人(n=450)、美国韩裔(n=519)和韩国人(n=2030)。
采用多指标多原因模型来确定群体归属对积极情绪项目反应的影响,同时控制潜在的抑郁症状特征。
数据显示,韩国人和美国韩裔比非西班牙裔白人更不可能认可积极情绪项目。与更融入主流美国文化的美国韩裔相比,那些文化融合程度较低的人不太可能认可积极情绪项目。
我们的发现支持这样一种观点,即人们认可抑郁症状的方式在很大程度上受到文化取向的影响。这些发现质疑了在不同文化群体中普遍使用简单的均值比较和普遍的截断点的做法。