Hypertension Center, 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Hypertens Res. 2010 Oct;33(10):995-9. doi: 10.1038/hr.2010.127. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
The aim of this study is to assess the effect of hospital admission on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) in hypertensive subjects. Treated or untreated hypertensive adults with open-angle glaucoma underwent inpatient and outpatient 24-h ABP monitoring in a random order 4 weeks apart. Awake ambulatory hours, awake in-bed hours and sleep hours were reported by participants. The nighttime-to-daytime ABP dip (%) and the sleeping-to-awake dip (ambulatory and in-bed) were determined using the two ABP recordings. A total of 40 subjects were analyzed (mean age 65.7 ± 8.4 (s.d.) years, n=19 men). Daytime systolic BP (SBP) was lower in the hospital than in the outpatient setting (mean difference 4.3 ± 10.4 mm Hg, P=0.01), as was the awake ambulatory SBP (mean difference 5.0 ± 11.1 mm Hg, P=0.008). No differences were detected in 24 h, nighttime or sleeping SBP or in any of the respective diastolic outpatient vs. inpatient ABP measurements. The nighttime SBP dip (vs. daytime) was larger in the outpatient setting (8.9 ± 7.5% and 5.2 ± 4.7%, respectively; P=0.003). Sleeping SBP dip (vs. awake ambulatory and awake in-bed) was also larger in the outpatient setting (11.1 ± 7.3 and 7.8 ± 5.9%, respectively; P=0.02) with no difference in diastolic ABP. These data suggest that inpatient 24-h ABP monitoring does not reflect the usual BP level during routine daily life, nor does it represent the usual diurnal pattern of an individual. Relying on the 24-h ABP monitoring performed in the hospital environment may lead to an underestimation of ABP and an overdiagnosis of non-dippers. Therefore, 24-h ABP monitoring for decision making regarding diagnosis and treatment of hypertension should be performed only in the routine daily conditions of each individual.
本研究旨在评估住院对高血压患者 24 小时动态血压(ABP)的影响。患有开角型青光眼的治疗或未治疗的高血压成年人以随机顺序相隔 4 周接受住院和门诊 24 小时 ABP 监测。参与者报告了清醒活动时间、清醒卧床时间和睡眠时间。使用两次 ABP 记录确定夜间到日间 ABP 下降(%)和睡眠到清醒下降(活动和卧床)。共分析了 40 例患者(平均年龄 65.7 ± 8.4(标准差)岁,n=19 名男性)。与门诊相比,住院时日间收缩压(SBP)较低(平均差异 4.3 ± 10.4mmHg,P=0.01),清醒活动时 SBP 也较低(平均差异 5.0 ± 11.1mmHg,P=0.008)。24 小时、夜间或睡眠 SBP 或任何相应的门诊与住院 ABP 测量的舒张压均无差异。与日间相比,门诊时夜间 SBP 下降(夜间与日间相比分别为 8.9 ± 7.5%和 5.2 ± 4.7%,P=0.003)更大。与清醒活动和清醒卧床相比,门诊时睡眠 SBP 下降(夜间与清醒活动和清醒卧床相比分别为 11.1 ± 7.3%和 7.8 ± 5.9%,P=0.02),而舒张压无差异。这些数据表明,住院 24 小时 ABP 监测不能反映日常日常生活中的常规血压水平,也不能代表个体的常规昼夜模式。依赖于在医院环境中进行的 24 小时 ABP 监测可能导致对 ABP 的低估和对非杓型的过度诊断。因此,用于决定高血压诊断和治疗的 24 小时 ABP 监测仅应在每个人的常规日常条件下进行。