National Reference Centre for Enteric Campylobacter, Saint Pierre University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Jul;17(7):1001-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03328.x. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
Biochemical identification of Campylobacter and related organisms is not always specific, and may lead to diagnostic errors. The API Campy, the Vitek 2 system and matrix-assisted desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) are commercially available methods that are routinely used for the identification of these microorganisms. In the present study, we used 224 clinical isolates and ten reference strains previously identified by multiple PCR assays, whole cell protein profiling and either DNA-DNA hybridization or sequencing analysis to compare the reliability of these three methods for the identification of Campylobacter and related pathogens. The API Campy accurately identified 94.4% of Campylobacter jejuni ssp. jejuni and 73.8% of Campylobacter coli, but failed to correctly identify 52.3% of other Epsilobacteria. The Vitek 2 Neisseria-Haemophilus card correctly identified most C. jejuni ssp.jejuni (89.6%) and C. coli (87.7%) strains, which account for the majority of campylobacterioses reported in humans, but it failed in the identification of all of the other species. Despite a good identification rate for both C. jejuni ssp. jejuni and C. coli, both methods showed poor sensitivity in the identification of related organisms, and additional tests were frequently needed. In contrast to API Campy and Vitek, MALDI-TOF MS correctly identified 100% of C. coli and C. jejuni strains tested. With an overall sensitivity of 98.3% and a short response time, this technology appears to be a reliable and promising method for the routine identification of Campylobacter and other Epsilobacteria.
对弯曲菌属和相关微生物的生化鉴定并不总是具有特异性,可能会导致诊断错误。API Campy、Vitek 2 系统和基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)是商业化的鉴定方法,常用于这些微生物的鉴定。在本研究中,我们使用了 224 株临床分离株和 10 株参考株,这些参考株先前通过多重 PCR 检测、全细胞蛋白图谱分析以及 DNA-DNA 杂交或测序分析进行了鉴定,以比较这三种方法鉴定弯曲菌属和相关病原体的可靠性。API Campy 准确鉴定了 94.4%的空肠弯曲菌空肠亚种和 73.8%的大肠弯曲菌,但未能正确鉴定 52.3%的其他弯曲杆菌属。Vitek 2 Neisseria-Haemophilus card 正确鉴定了大多数空肠弯曲菌空肠亚种(89.6%)和大肠弯曲菌(87.7%),这些菌株占人类报道的弯曲菌病的大多数,但无法鉴定所有其他种。尽管两种方法对空肠弯曲菌空肠亚种和大肠弯曲菌的鉴定率都较高,但在鉴定相关微生物方面,它们的灵敏度都较差,通常需要进行额外的测试。与 API Campy 和 Vitek 不同,MALDI-TOF MS 正确鉴定了测试的所有大肠弯曲菌和空肠弯曲菌菌株。该技术的总灵敏度为 98.3%,响应时间短,似乎是一种可靠且有前途的常规鉴定弯曲菌和其他弯曲杆菌属的方法。