New York University School of Medicine and Bellevue Hospital Center, New York, NY 10016, USA.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Jul;39(1):51-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.04.001.
Despite data supporting its efficacy, barriers to implementation of buprenorphine for office-based treatment are present. Complications can occur during buprenorphine inductions, yet few published studies have examined this phase of treatment. To examine factors associated with complications during buprenorphine induction, we conducted a retrospective chart review of the first 107 patients receiving buprenorphine treatment in an urban community health center. The primary outcome, defined as complicated induction (precipitated or protracted withdrawal), was observed in 18 (16.8%) patients. Complicated inductions were associated with poorer treatment retention (than routine inductions) and decreased over time. Factors independently associated with complicated inductions included recent use of prescribed methadone, recent benzodiazepine use, no prior experience with buprenorphine, and a low initial dose of buprenorphine/naloxone. Findings from this study and further investigation of patient characteristics and treatment characteristics associated with complicated inductions can help guide buprenorphine treatment strategies.
尽管有数据支持其疗效,但在基于办公室的治疗中实施丁丙诺啡仍存在障碍。丁丙诺啡诱导期间可能会出现并发症,但很少有已发表的研究检查过这一治疗阶段。为了研究丁丙诺啡诱导期间与并发症相关的因素,我们对在城市社区卫生中心接受丁丙诺啡治疗的前 107 名患者进行了回顾性图表审查。主要结局定义为复杂诱导(急剧或延长戒断),在 18 名(16.8%)患者中观察到。复杂诱导与较差的治疗保留率(与常规诱导相比)和随时间减少有关。与复杂诱导独立相关的因素包括最近使用处方美沙酮、最近使用苯二氮䓬类药物、以前没有使用过丁丙诺啡以及丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮的初始剂量较低。这项研究的结果以及对与复杂诱导相关的患者特征和治疗特征的进一步研究可以帮助指导丁丙诺啡治疗策略。