Section of Population Health, University of Aberdeen, UK.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Aug 4;8:81. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-81.
Differential item functioning (DIF) methods can be used to determine whether different subgroups respond differently to particular items within a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) subscale, after allowing for overall subgroup differences in that scale. This article reviews issues that arise when testing for DIF in HRQoL instruments. We focus on logistic regression methods, which are often used because of their efficiency, simplicity and ease of application.
A review of logistic regression DIF analyses in HRQoL was undertaken. Methodological articles from other fields and using other DIF methods were also included if considered relevant.
There are many competing approaches for the conduct of DIF analyses and many criteria for determining what constitutes significant DIF. DIF in short scales, as commonly found in HRQL instruments, may be more difficult to interpret. Qualitative methods may aid interpretation of such DIF analyses.
A number of methodological choices must be made when applying logistic regression for DIF analyses, and many of these affect the results. We provide recommendations based on reviewing the current evidence. Although the focus is on logistic regression, many of our results should be applicable to DIF analyses in general. There is a need for more empirical and theoretical work in this area.
差异项目功能(DIF)方法可用于确定在健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)子量表中,在允许该量表的总体亚组差异后,不同亚组对特定项目的反应是否不同。本文回顾了在 HRQoL 工具中测试 DIF 时出现的问题。我们专注于逻辑回归方法,由于其效率、简单性和易于应用,这些方法通常被使用。
对 HRQoL 中逻辑回归 DIF 分析进行了回顾。如果认为相关,还包括了来自其他领域的方法学文章和使用其他 DIF 方法的文章。
对于 DIF 分析的进行,有许多相互竞争的方法,并且有许多标准用于确定什么构成显著的 DIF。在 HRQL 工具中常见的短量表中的 DIF 可能更难以解释。定性方法可能有助于解释这种 DIF 分析。
在应用逻辑回归进行 DIF 分析时,必须做出许多方法选择,其中许多选择会影响结果。我们根据审查当前证据提出了建议。虽然重点是逻辑回归,但我们的许多结果应该适用于一般的 DIF 分析。在这一领域需要更多的实证和理论工作。