SAHK, Home-Based Rehabilitation Service, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(8):697-705. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.506240. Epub 2010 Aug 7.
Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) has been practiced in mainland China for over three decades. This study reviews the development of CBR and describes its practice in Chinese communities in order to discuss current controversies within CBR practice internationally and in the Chinese context.
Review of literature. Development of CBR, its principles and controversies internationally and in the Eastern world is reviewed. CBR practice in Chinese communities is examined.
Shifting ideology and practices mean many different activities are labelled CBR. Variation across contexts has led to many controversies, specifically: the lack of evidence to support practice; ownership of programs; conceptual differences surrounding autonomy and participation and cultural issues. Contemporary Chinese cultural values and Chinese CBR are shaped by traditional peasant culture, traditional Chinese philosophy and socialist ideology.
The review indicates that Western CBR concepts and philosophy cannot be directly applied to the Chinese context. An appropriate model or framework is needed to fit the unique Chinese cultural context and to guide practice in Chinese communities.
社区康复(CBR)在中国内地已经实施了三十多年。本研究回顾了 CBR 的发展,并描述了其在中国社区的实践情况,旨在讨论国际和中国语境下 CBR 实践中当前存在的争议。
文献回顾。回顾了 CBR 的发展,以及国际和东方世界的 CBR 原则和争议。考察了中国社区的 CBR 实践情况。
思想和实践的转变意味着许多不同的活动都被贴上了 CBR 的标签。由于背景的差异,导致了许多争议,特别是:缺乏实践证据;项目的所有权;围绕自主性和参与性的概念差异以及文化问题。当代中国的文化价值观和中国的 CBR 受到传统农民文化、中国传统哲学和社会主义意识形态的影响。
综述表明,西方的 CBR 概念和理念不能直接应用于中国背景。需要一个合适的模式或框架来适应独特的中国文化背景,并指导中国社区的实践。