• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

披露患者安全事件:全面综述。

Disclosure of patient safety incidents: a comprehensive review.

机构信息

Head of Safety and Learning, Health Information and Quality Authority, George's Court, George's Lane, Smithfield, Dublin 7, Ireland.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2010 Oct;22(5):371-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq042. Epub 2010 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzq042
PMID:20709703
Abstract

PURPOSE

Adverse events are increasingly recognized as a source of harm to patients. When such harm occurs, problems arise in communicating the situation to patients and their families. We reviewed the literature on disclosure across individual and international boundaries, including patients', healthcare professionals' and other stakeholders' perspectives in order to ascertain how the needs of all groups could be better reconciled.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review of the literature was carried out using the search terms 'patient safety', 'medical error', 'communication', 'clinicians', 'healthcare professionals' and 'disclosure'. All articles relating to either patients' or healthcare professionals' experiences or attitudes toward disclosure were included.

RESULTS

Both patients and healthcare professionals support the disclosure of adverse events to patients and their families. Patients have specific requirements including frank and timely disclosure, an apology where appropriate and assurances about their future care. However, research suggests that there is a gap between ideal disclosure practice and reality. Although healthcare is delivered by multidisciplinary teams, much of the research that has been conducted has focused on physicians' experiences. Research indicates that other healthcare professionals also have a role to play in the disclosure process and this should be reflected in disclosure policies.

CONCLUSIONS

This comprehensive review, which takes account of the perspectives of the patient and members of the care team across multiple jurisdictions, suggests that disclosure practice can be improved by strengthening policy and supporting healthcare professionals in disclosing adverse events. Increased openness and honesty following adverse events can improve provider-patient relationships.

摘要

目的

不良事件越来越被认为是对患者造成伤害的一个原因。当这种伤害发生时,在向患者及其家属传达情况时就会出现问题。我们回顾了跨越个人和国际边界的披露文献,包括患者、医疗保健专业人员和其他利益相关者的观点,以确定如何更好地协调所有群体的需求。

资料来源

使用“患者安全”、“医疗错误”、“沟通”、“临床医生”、“医疗保健专业人员”和“披露”等术语对文献进行了系统回顾。所有与患者或医疗保健专业人员对披露的经验或态度有关的文章都被包括在内。

结果

患者和医疗保健专业人员都支持向患者及其家属披露不良事件。患者有具体的要求,包括坦诚和及时的披露、适当的道歉以及对未来护理的保证。然而,研究表明,理想的披露实践与现实之间存在差距。尽管医疗保健是由多学科团队提供的,但许多已经进行的研究都集中在医生的经验上。研究表明,其他医疗保健专业人员在披露过程中也有作用,这应该反映在披露政策中。

结论

这项全面的综述考虑了来自多个司法管辖区的患者和护理团队成员的观点,表明通过加强政策和支持医疗保健专业人员披露不良事件,可以改善披露实践。在发生不良事件后增加开放性和诚实性可以改善医患关系。

相似文献

1
Disclosure of patient safety incidents: a comprehensive review.披露患者安全事件:全面综述。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2010 Oct;22(5):371-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq042. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials.随机对照试验中参与者和专业人员偏好影响的概念框架与系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Sep;9(35):1-186, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9350.
4
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
5
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
6
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
9
Patient experiences of partnering with healthcare professionals for hand hygiene compliance: a systematic review.患者与医护人员合作以确保手部卫生合规的经历:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Jun;15(6):1645-1670. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003001.
10
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in public perceptions of patient safety during the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from a repeated cross-sectional survey in Germany, 2019-2023.2019 - 2023年德国重复横断面调查结果:新冠疫情期间公众对患者安全认知的趋势
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 5;20(8):e0329761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329761. eCollection 2025.
2
A closer look at the role of apology in error disclosure: a simulation study.深入探究道歉在错误披露中的作用:一项模拟研究。
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jun 3;5:1569550. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1569550. eCollection 2025.
3
What can we learn from patient and family experiences of open disclosure and how they have been evaluated? A systematic review.
我们能从患者及其家属的公开披露经历以及这些经历是如何被评估中学到什么?一项系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 12;25(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12388-3.
4
Critical incidents in gynaecology: a one year audit in an academic hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa.妇科危急事件:南非约翰内斯堡一家学术医院的一年审计
Pan Afr Med J. 2024 Aug 28;48:189. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2024.48.189.38552. eCollection 2024.
5
Disclosure of medical errors to patients by medical professionals: a protocol for a qualitative systematic review.医学专业人员向患者披露医疗差错:一项定性系统评价的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 11;14(10):e085795. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085795.
6
Nature and type of patient-reported safety incidents at a tertiary hospital in South Africa during the COVID-19 period (2018-2021)- A retrospective review.南非一家三级医院在 COVID-19 期间(2018-2021 年)报告的患者安全事件的性质和类型-回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 9;18(11):e0293933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293933. eCollection 2023.
7
Opportunities to strengthen resilience of health care workers regarding patient safety.加强医护人员在患者安全方面的韧性的机会。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 19;23(1):1127. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10054-0.
8
Ethical Considerations for Artificial Intelligence in Interventional Radiology: Balancing Innovation and Patient Care.介入放射学中人工智能的伦理考量:平衡创新与患者护理
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2023 Jul 20;40(3):323-326. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769905. eCollection 2023 Jun.
9
Factors related to liability for damages for adverse events occurring in long-term care facilities.与长期护理机构不良事件损害赔偿责任相关的因素。
PLoS One. 2023 May 19;18(5):e0283332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283332. eCollection 2023.
10
Strengthening open disclosure after incidents in maternity care: a realist synthesis of international research evidence.加强产科学事件后的公开披露:国际研究证据的现实主义综合。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 27;23(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09033-2.