• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

营养标签格式综述。

Review of nutrition labeling formats.

作者信息

Geiger C J, Wyse B W, Parent C R, Hansen R G

机构信息

Division of Foods and Nutrition, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84112.

出版信息

J Am Diet Assoc. 1991 Jul;91(7):808-12, 815.

PMID:2071796
Abstract

This article examines nutrition labeling history as well as the findings of nine research studies of nutrition labeling formats. Nutrition labeling regulations were announced in 1973 and have been periodically amended since then. In response to requests from consumers and health care professionals for revision of the labeling system, the Food and Drug Administration initiated a three-phase plan for reform of nutrition labeling in 1990. President Bush signed the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act in November 1990. Literature analysis revealed that only nine studies with an experimental design have focused on nutrition labeling since 1971. Four were conducted before 1975, which was the year that nutrition labeling was officially implemented, two were conducted in 1980, and three were conducted after 1986. Only two of the nine studies supported the traditional label format mandated by the Code of Federal Regulations, and one study partially supported it. Four of the nine studies that evaluated graphic presentations of nutrition information found that consumer comprehension of nutrition information was improved with a graphic format for nutrition labeling: three studies supported the use of bar graphs and one study supported the use of a pie chart. Full disclosure (ie, complete nutrient and ingredient labeling) was preferred by consumers in two of the three studies that examined this variable. The third study supported three types of information disclosure dependent upon socioeconomic class. In those studies that tested graphics, a bar graph format was significantly preferred and showed better consumer comprehension than the traditional format.

摘要

本文考察了营养标签的历史以及九项关于营养标签格式的研究结果。营养标签法规于1973年公布,此后定期修订。为回应消费者和医疗保健专业人员对修订标签系统的要求,美国食品药品监督管理局于1990年启动了一项分三个阶段的营养标签改革计划。布什总统于1990年11月签署了《营养标签与教育法案》。文献分析显示,自1971年以来,只有九项采用实验设计的研究关注营养标签。四项研究在1975年之前进行,这一年营养标签正式实施;两项研究在1980年进行;三项研究在1986年之后进行。九项研究中只有两项支持《联邦法规法典》规定的传统标签格式,一项研究部分支持该格式。在评估营养信息图形展示的九项研究中,有四项发现采用图形格式的营养标签能提高消费者对营养信息的理解:三项研究支持使用柱状图,一项研究支持使用饼状图。在三项考察这一变量的研究中,有两项研究表明消费者更喜欢完全披露(即完整的营养成分和配料标签)。第三项研究支持根据社会经济阶层划分的三种信息披露类型。在那些测试图形的研究中,柱状图格式明显更受青睐,并且与传统格式相比,消费者对其理解更好。

相似文献

1
Review of nutrition labeling formats.营养标签格式综述。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1991 Jul;91(7):808-12, 815.
2
Nutrition labels in bar graph format deemed most useful for consumer purchase decisions using adaptive conjoint analysis.
J Am Diet Assoc. 1991 Jul;91(7):800-7.
3
Status of nutrition labeling, health claims, and nutrient content claims for processed foods: 1997 Food Label and Package Survey.加工食品的营养标签、健康声明和营养成分声明状况:1997年食品标签与包装调查
J Am Diet Assoc. 2000 Sep;100(9):1057-62. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00308-4.
4
Health claims: history, current regulatory status, and consumer research.健康声称:历史、当前监管状况及消费者研究。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1998 Nov;98(11):1312-22; discussion 1323-4. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00294-6.
5
More effective nutrition label formats are not necessarily preferred.更有效的营养标签格式不一定更受青睐。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1992 Oct;92(10):1230-4.
6
Do nutrition labels improve dietary outcomes?营养标签能改善饮食结果吗?
Health Econ. 2008 Jun;17(6):695-708. doi: 10.1002/hec.1287.
7
Consumer testing of the acceptability and effectiveness of front-of-pack food labelling systems for the Australian grocery market.针对澳大利亚食品杂货市场的包装正面食品标签系统的可接受性和有效性进行的消费者测试。
Health Promot Int. 2009 Jun;24(2):120-9. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dap012. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
8
Rationale and evidence for menu-labeling legislation.制定食品标签法规的理由和依据。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Dec;37(6):546-51. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.07.015.
9
Food allergen labeling in the USA and Europe.美国和欧洲的食品过敏原标签
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Jun;6(3):186-90. doi: 10.1097/01.all.0000225158.75521.ad.
10
Nutrition and related claims used on packaged Australian foods--implications for regulation.澳大利亚包装食品上使用的营养及相关声明——对监管的影响
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2003;12(2):138-50.

引用本文的文献

1
Global Trends and Research Collaborations on Food and Beverages Warning Labels: A Bibliometric Analysis.全球食品和饮料警示标签的趋势和研究合作:文献计量分析。
Nutrients. 2024 Oct 15;16(20):3493. doi: 10.3390/nu16203493.
2
Nutrition fact label (NFL) use is related to meeting the requirements for vitamins and minerals not listed on NFLs: Data from the Korea National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey VIII (2019-2021) for the prepandemic and pandemic periods.营养成分标签(NFL)的使用与满足 NFL 未列出的维生素和矿物质的要求有关:来自韩国全国健康和营养检查调查 VIII(2019-2021 年)的大流行前和大流行期间的数据。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 28;18(12):e0296268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296268. eCollection 2023.
3
Aiding food security and sustainability efforts through graph neural network-based consumer food ingredient detection and substitution.
通过基于图神经网络的消费者食品成分检测和替代,助力粮食安全和可持续发展。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 1;13(1):18809. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44859-0.
4
Pharmaceutical Benefit-Risk Communication Tools: A Review of the Literature.药品效益-风险沟通工具:文献综述
Drug Saf. 2017 Jan;40(1):15-36. doi: 10.1007/s40264-016-0466-1.
5
Reds are more important than greens: how UK supermarket shoppers use the different information on a traffic light nutrition label in a choice experiment.红色比绿色更重要:英国超市购物者在一项选择实验中如何使用交通信号灯营养标签上的不同信息。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Dec 12;12:151. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0319-9.
6
The impact of adding front-of-package sodium content labels to grocery products: an experimental study.添加商品包装正面钠含量标签对食品的影响:一项实验研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Mar;16(3):383-91. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012003485. Epub 2012 Aug 3.