• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骶神经刺激治疗大便失禁:单中心 10 年随访结果。

Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: results from a single centre over a 10-year period.

机构信息

Physiology Unit, St Mark's Hospital, Middlesex, UK.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2011 Sep;13(9):1030-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02383.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02383.x
PMID:20718837
Abstract

AIM

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is considered a first-line surgical treatment option for faecal incontinence. There is little information on long-term results. The results of SNS for faecal incontinence performed at a single centre over a 10-year period are reported.

METHOD

A cohort analysis of consecutive patients treated with SNS for faecal incontinence over a 10-year period was carried out. Data were collected prospectively using bowel habit diaries and St Mark's and Cleveland Clinic incontinence scores. Treatment success was defined as a >50% reduction in episodes of faecal incontinence compared with baseline.

RESULTS

Temporary SNS was performed in 118 patients, and 91 (77%) were considered suitable for chronic stimulation. The median period of follow up was 22 (1-138) months. Seventy patients were followed for 1 year with success in 63 (90%). Of 18 patients followed for 5 years, 15 (83%) reported continued success, 11 (61%) maintained full efficacy, 4 (22%) reported some loss, and 3 (17%) reported complete loss. Three patients with a 10-year follow up had no loss in efficacy. Overall, complete loss of efficacy was observed in 14 (16%) patients at a median of 11.5 months following implantation. A further 5 (6%) patients showed deterioration with time. In 9 (47%), no reason for the deterioration in symptoms could be identified.

CONCLUSIONS

SNS can be effective for up to 10 years. Some patients experience deterioration in symptoms over time. The reasons for this are often not evident.

摘要

目的

骶神经刺激(SNS)被认为是治疗粪便失禁的一线手术治疗选择。关于长期结果的信息很少。报告了在单个中心进行的 SNS 治疗粪便失禁 10 年期间的结果。

方法

对 10 年内接受 SNS 治疗粪便失禁的连续患者进行了队列分析。使用排便习惯日记和圣马克和克利夫兰诊所失禁评分前瞻性地收集数据。治疗成功定义为与基线相比,粪便失禁发作减少>50%。

结果

在 118 例患者中进行了临时 SNS,其中 91 例(77%)被认为适合慢性刺激。中位随访时间为 22 个月(1-138 个月)。70 例患者随访 1 年,63 例(90%)成功。18 例随访 5 年的患者中,15 例(83%)报告持续成功,11 例(61%)保持完全疗效,4 例(22%)报告部分丧失,3 例(17%)报告完全丧失。3 例随访 10 年的患者无疗效丧失。总体而言,植入后中位时间为 11.5 个月,14 例(16%)患者完全丧失疗效。另有 5 例(6%)患者随时间恶化。在 9 例(47%)中,无法确定症状恶化的原因。

结论

SNS 最长可有效 10 年。一些患者随时间推移出现症状恶化。其原因往往不明显。

相似文献

1
Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: results from a single centre over a 10-year period.骶神经刺激治疗大便失禁:单中心 10 年随访结果。
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Sep;13(9):1030-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02383.x.
2
Sacral nerve stimulation in the elderly.老年患者的骶神经刺激治疗。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Feb;14(2):200-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02568.x.
3
Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of fecal incontinence.骶神经刺激治疗粪便失禁的疗效。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Oct;54(10):1271-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182270af1.
4
Long-term outcomes of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence.经直肠刺激治疗大便失禁的长期疗效。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Mar;55(3):302-6. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182401ecd.
5
Quality of life is markedly improved in patients with fecal incontinence after sacral nerve stimulation.骶神经刺激后,大便失禁患者的生活质量有显著改善。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012 Mar-Apr;18(2):103-12. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182486e60.
6
Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: its role in the treatment algorithm.骶神经刺激治疗粪便失禁:在治疗方案中的作用。
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Mar;13 Suppl 2:10-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02519.x.
7
Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: long-term outcome.骶神经刺激治疗大便失禁:长期疗效
Colorectal Dis. 2009 Jul;11(6):636-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01673.x. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
8
The effects of sacral nerve stimulation on continence are temporarily maintained after turning the stimulator off.骶神经刺激对控尿的影响在关闭刺激器后暂时维持。
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Dec;15(12):e741-8. doi: 10.1111/codi.12418.
9
Long-term outcomes of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence.经直肠刺激治疗大便失禁的长期疗效。
Br J Surg. 2015 Mar;102(4):407-15. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9740. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
10
Does the magnetic anal sphincter device compare favourably with sacral nerve stimulation in the management of faecal incontinence?磁括约肌设备在治疗粪便失禁方面是否优于骶神经刺激?
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jun;14(6):e323-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02995.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Sacral Neuromodulation in Patients With Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: The SANLARS Randomized Clinical Trial.骶神经调节治疗低位前切除综合征患者的随机临床试验(SANLARS)
Dis Colon Rectum. 2024 Mar 1;67(3):435-447. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003143. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
2
Sacral nerve modulation for patients with fecal incontinence: long-term outcome and effects on sexual function.骶神经调节治疗大便失禁患者:长期疗效及对性功能的影响。
Updates Surg. 2023 Aug;75(5):1187-1195. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01570-z. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
3
Low anterior resection syndrome: An unavoidable price to pay to preserve the rectum?
低位前切除术综合征:保留直肠需付出的不可避免的代价?
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 14;12:994720. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.994720. eCollection 2022.
4
Reprogramming Sacral Neuromodulation for Sub-Optimal Outcomes: Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Practice.重新编程骶神经调节以改善次优结果:临床实践的证据和建议。
Neuromodulation. 2021 Oct;24(7):1247-1257. doi: 10.1111/ner.13494. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
5
Sacral neuromodulation - when and for who.骶神经调节——何时适用及适用人群
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 May-Jun;47(3):647-656. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.99.08.
6
Current Position of Sacral Neuromodulation in Treatment of Fecal Incontinence.骶神经调节在大便失禁治疗中的现状
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021 Jan;34(1):22-27. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714247. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
7
Five-year single center experience of sacral neuromodulation for isolated fecal incontinence or fecal incontinence combined with low anterior resection syndrome.骶神经调节治疗单纯性大便失禁或合并低位前切除综合征的大便失禁的单中心五年经验
Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Sep;24(9):947-958. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02245-2. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
8
The efficacy of sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of low anterior resection syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.骶神经调节治疗低位前切除综合征的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Aug;24(8):803-815. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02231-8. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
9
Success and Complication Rates After Sacral Neuromodulation for Fecal Incontinence and Constipation: A Single-center Follow-up Study.骶神经调节治疗大便失禁和便秘后的成功率及并发症发生率:一项单中心随访研究
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019 Jan 31;25(1):159-170. doi: 10.5056/jnm17106.
10
Cost-effectiveness of sacral nerve stimulation and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence.骶神经刺激和经皮胫神经刺激治疗大便失禁的成本效益
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct 8;11:1756284818802562. doi: 10.1177/1756284818802562. eCollection 2018.