Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Karolinska Institute Stockholm, Sweden.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1996 Mar;6(1):67-72. doi: 10.1016/1050-6411(95)00014-3.
Electromyographic (EMG) recording of the myoelectrical activity level in the trapezius muscle is often used as one method of assessing neck and shoulder muscle workload. To analyse how the normalization value influences interpretation of upper trapezius load during a work task, two different reference values for normalization were applied - one obtained during a maximum voluntary contraction (MVE) and the other during a standardized muscular load (RVE). Nine jet pilots (ages 30-48 yr) flew two sorties in a 37 Viggen aircraft using either of two types of head garment while 3-D acceleration and muscular activity were recorded. In each sortie twice in the programme a steep left turn at 5-6 +G(Z) was performed. The highest activity level (MVE) obtained during shoulder elevation combined with an isometric heavy resistance (maximum) against arm flexion/abduction was used as one normalization value. Before, between, and after the two flights, 15 s EMG recordings (RVE) during a dumbbell test in the same arm position were also taken. The muscular activity in the upper trapezius during a given task varied a great deal between individuals, but the reliability of the amplitude levels on different occasions during a work day was good, given the same electrode location and application. If muscular activity during a standardized loading force (e.g. dumbbell test) is used to normalize the recordings for workload assessments related to utilized muscular capacity, a subject with high muscular strength and comparatively low workload might in some situations be assessed as having the same workload as, or a higher load than a subject with less strength and a comparatively high workload. While normalization using a standardized force can be used to assess changes in workload, for assessing workload related to the individual's capacity recording the myoelectrical activity during maximal contraction is preferable.
斜方肌肌电(EMG)记录通常被用作评估颈部和肩部肌肉工作量的一种方法,记录斜方肌的肌电活动水平。为了分析归一化值如何影响工作任务中对上斜方肌负荷的解释,我们应用了两种不同的归一化参考值 - 一种是在最大自主收缩(MVE)期间获得的,另一种是在标准化肌肉负荷(RVE)期间获得的。9 名喷气式飞机飞行员(年龄 30-48 岁)在使用两种头罩的情况下,在一架 37 型 Viggen 飞机上执行了两次任务,同时记录了 3-D 加速度和肌肉活动。在每个任务中,程序中两次执行了 5-6 +G(Z)的陡峭左转。在肩部抬高的同时,通过手臂弯曲/外展进行最大等长重阻力(最大)获得的最高活动水平(MVE)用作归一化值之一。在两次飞行之前、之间和之后,还在相同手臂位置进行了 15 秒哑铃测试的 EMG 记录(RVE)。在给定任务中,上斜方肌的肌肉活动在个体之间差异很大,但是在工作日的不同场合下,给定相同的电极位置和应用,幅度水平的可靠性很好。如果使用标准化加载力(例如哑铃测试)的肌肉活动来对与所使用的肌肉能力相关的工作量评估进行归一化,则肌肉力量较高且工作量相对较低的受试者在某些情况下可能会被评估为与肌肉力量较低且工作量相对较高的受试者具有相同的工作量或更高的工作量。虽然使用标准化力进行归一化可以用于评估工作量的变化,但为了评估与个体能力相关的工作量,记录最大收缩期间的肌电活动更可取。