Division of Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care Program, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7550, USA.
Clin Trials. 2010 Dec;7(6):735-43. doi: 10.1177/1740774510380241. Epub 2010 Aug 20.
One in four Americans, and 70% of people who have dementia, will spend their final days in nursing home care. Clinical research, particularly clinical trials, rarely includes this population due to unique challenges in research methods and ethics. Families of advanced dementia patients make choices about tube feeding and other feeding options with limited access to information or communication. The cluster randomized trial, Improving Decision Making about Feeding Options for Dementia Patients, tests a decision aid intervention to improve the quality of decision making for this choice.
Our objectives are (1) to describe the methods used in this trial; (2) to describe challenges and strategies for effective nursing home and nursing home resident recruitment and retention; and (3) to describe research ethics approaches to minimize harms and maximize benefits for this population.
The study is a cluster randomized trial of a decision aid to inform and support the choice between tube feeding and assisted oral feeding in advanced dementia. Study subjects are paired surrogate decision makers and residents with advanced dementia and feeding problems, enrolled from nursing homes in North Carolina.
This trial enrolled 256 paired surrogate decision makers and residents in 24 nursing home sites, and 99% completed participation through the 3-month study period. The research team had prior clinical and investigative experience in this setting, and used multiple strategies to recruit and retain nursing home sites, providers, surrogates, and the residents for whom they spoke. Informed consent and human subjects' protections were designed to address the vulnerability of this population.
Cluster randomization was necessary to avoid contamination between control and intervention subjects, but may introduce confounding by site and intracluster correlation effects in analyses.
Strategies that facilitate nursing home recruitment, participant recruitment and protection of human subjects for a vulnerable population may be used by future investigators to expand the research evidence base for nursing home and dementia care.
四分之一的美国人,以及 70%的痴呆症患者,将在疗养院度过他们生命的最后几天。由于研究方法和伦理方面的独特挑战,临床研究,特别是临床试验,很少将这一人群纳入研究范围。患有晚期痴呆症的患者家属在选择管饲和其他喂养方式时,通常无法获得足够的信息或沟通,只能做出选择。正在进行的“改善痴呆患者喂养选择决策的临床试验”测试了一种决策辅助干预措施,以改善该选择的决策质量。
本研究的目的是(1)描述该试验中使用的方法;(2)描述在疗养院和疗养院居民中进行有效招募和保留的挑战和策略;(3)描述研究伦理方法,以最大限度地减少对这一人群的伤害,同时使他们受益。
本研究是一项关于决策辅助工具的群组随机试验,旨在为晚期痴呆症患者选择管饲和辅助口服喂养提供信息和支持。研究对象是来自北卡罗来纳州疗养院的有严重痴呆和进食问题的配对代理人和居民。
该试验共纳入了 24 个疗养院的 256 对代理决策人和居民,99%的参与者在 3 个月的研究期间完成了所有研究步骤。研究团队在该环境下具有丰富的临床和调查经验,并采用了多种策略来招募和保留疗养院、护理人员、代理人以及他们所代表的居民。知情同意和保护人类受试者的措施旨在解决这一人群的脆弱性问题。
为了避免对照和干预组之间的交叉污染,采用了群组随机化,但可能会在分析中引入因地点和组内相关性而产生的混杂因素。
为脆弱人群制定的促进疗养院招募、参与者招募和保护人类受试者的策略,可能会被未来的研究人员用于扩大疗养院和痴呆症护理的研究证据基础。