Suppr超能文献

成功的养老院临床研究:改善决策研究。

Successful clinical trial research in nursing homes: the Improving Decision-Making Study.

机构信息

Division of Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care Program, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7550, USA.

出版信息

Clin Trials. 2010 Dec;7(6):735-43. doi: 10.1177/1740774510380241. Epub 2010 Aug 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

One in four Americans, and 70% of people who have dementia, will spend their final days in nursing home care. Clinical research, particularly clinical trials, rarely includes this population due to unique challenges in research methods and ethics. Families of advanced dementia patients make choices about tube feeding and other feeding options with limited access to information or communication. The cluster randomized trial, Improving Decision Making about Feeding Options for Dementia Patients, tests a decision aid intervention to improve the quality of decision making for this choice.

PURPOSE

Our objectives are (1) to describe the methods used in this trial; (2) to describe challenges and strategies for effective nursing home and nursing home resident recruitment and retention; and (3) to describe research ethics approaches to minimize harms and maximize benefits for this population.

METHODS

The study is a cluster randomized trial of a decision aid to inform and support the choice between tube feeding and assisted oral feeding in advanced dementia. Study subjects are paired surrogate decision makers and residents with advanced dementia and feeding problems, enrolled from nursing homes in North Carolina.

RESULTS

This trial enrolled 256 paired surrogate decision makers and residents in 24 nursing home sites, and 99% completed participation through the 3-month study period. The research team had prior clinical and investigative experience in this setting, and used multiple strategies to recruit and retain nursing home sites, providers, surrogates, and the residents for whom they spoke. Informed consent and human subjects' protections were designed to address the vulnerability of this population.

LIMITATIONS

Cluster randomization was necessary to avoid contamination between control and intervention subjects, but may introduce confounding by site and intracluster correlation effects in analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Strategies that facilitate nursing home recruitment, participant recruitment and protection of human subjects for a vulnerable population may be used by future investigators to expand the research evidence base for nursing home and dementia care.

摘要

背景

四分之一的美国人,以及 70%的痴呆症患者,将在疗养院度过他们生命的最后几天。由于研究方法和伦理方面的独特挑战,临床研究,特别是临床试验,很少将这一人群纳入研究范围。患有晚期痴呆症的患者家属在选择管饲和其他喂养方式时,通常无法获得足够的信息或沟通,只能做出选择。正在进行的“改善痴呆患者喂养选择决策的临床试验”测试了一种决策辅助干预措施,以改善该选择的决策质量。

目的

本研究的目的是(1)描述该试验中使用的方法;(2)描述在疗养院和疗养院居民中进行有效招募和保留的挑战和策略;(3)描述研究伦理方法,以最大限度地减少对这一人群的伤害,同时使他们受益。

方法

本研究是一项关于决策辅助工具的群组随机试验,旨在为晚期痴呆症患者选择管饲和辅助口服喂养提供信息和支持。研究对象是来自北卡罗来纳州疗养院的有严重痴呆和进食问题的配对代理人和居民。

结果

该试验共纳入了 24 个疗养院的 256 对代理决策人和居民,99%的参与者在 3 个月的研究期间完成了所有研究步骤。研究团队在该环境下具有丰富的临床和调查经验,并采用了多种策略来招募和保留疗养院、护理人员、代理人以及他们所代表的居民。知情同意和保护人类受试者的措施旨在解决这一人群的脆弱性问题。

局限性

为了避免对照和干预组之间的交叉污染,采用了群组随机化,但可能会在分析中引入因地点和组内相关性而产生的混杂因素。

结论

为脆弱人群制定的促进疗养院招募、参与者招募和保护人类受试者的策略,可能会被未来的研究人员用于扩大疗养院和痴呆症护理的研究证据基础。

相似文献

1
Successful clinical trial research in nursing homes: the Improving Decision-Making Study.
Clin Trials. 2010 Dec;7(6):735-43. doi: 10.1177/1740774510380241. Epub 2010 Aug 20.
2
Impact of a decision aid on surrogate decision-makers' perceptions of feeding options for patients with dementia.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Feb;14(2):114-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.10.011. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
3
Fidelity to a behavioral intervention to improve goals of care decisions for nursing home residents with advanced dementia.
Clin Trials. 2016 Dec;13(6):599-604. doi: 10.1177/1740774516650863. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
4
Improving decision-making for feeding options in advanced dementia: a randomized, controlled trial.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Nov;59(11):2009-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03629.x. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
7
Effect of the Goals of Care Intervention for Advanced Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jan 1;177(1):24-31. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7031.
8
Development and testing of a decision aid on goals of care for advanced dementia.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Apr;15(4):251-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.11.020. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
10
Tube-feeding versus hand-feeding nursing home residents with advanced dementia: a cost comparison.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2004 Mar-Apr;5(2 Suppl):S22-9. doi: 10.1097/01.JAM.0000043421.46230.0E.

引用本文的文献

2
Effects of Nonpharmacological Interventions on Disruptive Vocalisation in Nursing Home Patients With Dementia-A Systematic Review.
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Feb 3;2:718302. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.718302. eCollection 2021.
3
Decision Aid Interventions for Family Caregivers of Persons With Advanced Dementia in Decision-Making About Feeding Options: A Scoping Review.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Dec;23(12):1927.e1-1927.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.08.014. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
4
Stakeholders' views on priorities essential for establishing a supportive environment for clinical trials in nursing homes.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Apr;70(4):950-959. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17710. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
5
Palliative care interventions in advanced dementia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 28;9(9):CD011513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011513.pub3.
6
The full spectrum of ethical issues in dementia research: findings of a systematic qualitative review.
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Mar 26;22(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00572-5.
8
Conducting Clinical Research in Post-acute and Long-term Nursing Home Care Settings: Regulatory Challenges.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Jul;20(7):798-803. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.04.022.
9
Nursing Home Staff Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing a Quality Improvement Intervention.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Jul;20(7):810-815. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.01.139. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
10
Blended Facilitation as an Effective Implementation Strategy for Quality Improvement and Research in Nursing Homes.
J Nurs Care Qual. 2019 Jul/Sep;34(3):210-216. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000376.

本文引用的文献

1
The clinical course of advanced dementia.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 15;361(16):1529-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0902234.
2
Suffering in silence: addressing the needs of nursing home residents.
J Palliat Med. 2009 Aug;12(8):671-2. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.9584.
3
The National Nursing Home Survey: 2004 overview.
Vital Health Stat 13. 2009 Jun(167):1-155.
4
Leadership styles of nursing home administrators and their association with staff turnover.
Gerontologist. 2009 Apr;49(2):166-74. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp021. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
5
Missing data: a special challenge in aging research.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Apr;57(4):722-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02168.x. Epub 2009 Feb 10.
6
Recruitment and retention of older adults in aging research.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Dec;56(12):2340-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02015.x.
7
Physicians' expectations of benefit from tube feeding.
J Palliat Med. 2008 Oct;11(8):1130-4. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2008.0033.
8
Striving to recruit: the difficulties of conducting clinical research on elderly care home residents.
J R Soc Med. 2007 Jun;100(6):258-61. doi: 10.1177/014107680710000608.
9
Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process.
BMJ. 2006 Aug 26;333(7565):417. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
10
Surrogates' perceptions about feeding tube placement decisions.
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 May;61(2):246-52. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.04.012. Epub 2006 Feb 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验