• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正面碰撞中 delta V 和身体区域的伤害风险,重点关注低速碰撞中的头部伤害。

Injury risks in frontal crashes by delta V and body region with focus on head injuries in low-speed collisions.

机构信息

ProBiomechanics LLC, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2010 Aug;11(4):382-90. doi: 10.1080/15389581003751623.

DOI:10.1080/15389581003751623
PMID:20730685
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study investigated injury risks in frontal crashes by belt use and crash severity (delta V) with a focus on studying whether there is a pattern to the crashes causing serious head injuries in low-speed frontal collisions.

METHODS

1996-2007 National Automotive Sample System-Crashworthiness Data System (NASS-CDS) was analyzed for frontal crashes involving front-outboard occupants. Light vehicles were included with model year 1997+. Injuries of maximum severity MAIS 0-6 and fatalities were determined by crash severity and belt. Body region injury (AIS 0-6) was also determined. NASS-CDS electronic cases involving <15 mph crashes were evaluated to determine the crash circumstances causing serious head injury (AIS 3+) in occupants with overall severe injuries (MAIS 4+F).

RESULTS

More than half (51.3%) of belted occupants in 10-15 mph delta V crashes were uninjured compared with 30.2 percent for unbelted occupants. The ratio of the fraction (relative risk) of belted occupants who were uninjured to the fraction of unbelted, uninjured occupants was highest at 3.74 in the 30-35 mph delta V. For 10-15 mph crashes, 0.40 +/- 0.15 percent of unbelted occupants were severely injured (MAIS 4+F) compared to 0.033 +/- 0.009 percent for belted occupants. For 30-35 mph crashes, 8.51 +/- 2.20 percent of unbelted and 5.83 +/- 1.93 percent of belted occupants were severely injured. Overall, seat belt use was 87.4 percent effective in preventing severe injury (MAIS 4+F). The effectiveness decreased with increasing crash severity. The highest relative risk for severe injury of unbelted compared to belted occupants was 12.3 in crashes of 10-15 mph delta V. The relative risk was 8.8 in <10 mph crashes. Overall, the relative risk was 8.0 for severe injury (MAIS 4+F) in frontal crashes. 16.5 +/- 0.98 percent of unbelted occupants experienced serious (AIS 3-6) injury. This risk was 6.49 times greater than the 2.53 +/- 0.10 percent risk with belted occupants. The largest relative risk for serious injury (AIS 3-6) was to the neck (367 times), face (15.5 times) and head (10.2 times).

CONCLUSIONS

The highest relative risk for severe injury of unbelted occupants was in frontal crashes <15 mph. Most of the crashes involved multiple impacts and air bag deployment in the accident sequence. The use of long fill-time side curtains, additional curtain deployment logic, limited deflation front air bags and broader curtain coverage of the front interior may address these injuries.

摘要

目的

本研究通过使用安全带和碰撞严重程度(delta V)来研究正面碰撞中的伤害风险,并重点研究在低速正面碰撞中是否存在导致严重头部受伤的碰撞模式。

方法

分析了 1996 年至 2007 年国家汽车抽样系统碰撞性能数据系统(NASS-CDS)中涉及前外侧乘客的正面碰撞。包括模型年份为 1997 年及以上的轻型车辆。通过碰撞严重程度和安全带确定最大严重程度 MAIS 0-6 和致命伤害。身体区域伤害(AIS 0-6)也通过确定。评估 NASS-CDS 电子案例中涉及 <15 英里/小时的碰撞,以确定导致整体严重受伤(MAIS 4+F)的乘客严重头部受伤(AIS 3+)的碰撞情况。

结果

在 10-15 英里/小时 delta V 碰撞中,超过一半(51.3%)系安全带的乘客未受伤,而未系安全带的乘客受伤比例为 30.2%。在 30-35 英里/小时 delta V 中,系安全带的未受伤乘客比例与未系安全带的未受伤乘客比例之比最高,为 3.74。对于 10-15 英里/小时的碰撞,0.40 +/- 0.15%的未系安全带乘客受重伤(MAIS 4+F),而系安全带乘客的这一比例为 0.033 +/- 0.009%。对于 30-35 英里/小时的碰撞,8.51 +/- 2.20%的未系安全带和 5.83 +/- 1.93%的系安全带乘客受重伤。总体而言,安全带的使用在防止严重受伤(MAIS 4+F)方面有效率为 87.4%。有效性随碰撞严重程度的增加而降低。未系安全带乘客与系安全带乘客相比,严重受伤的相对风险最高为 12.3,发生在 10-15 英里/小时 delta V 碰撞中。在 <10 英里/小时的碰撞中,相对风险为 8.8。总体而言,正面碰撞中严重受伤(MAIS 4+F)的相对风险为 8.0。16.5 +/- 0.98%的未系安全带乘客遭受严重(AIS 3-6)伤害。这一风险是系安全带乘客 2.53 +/- 0.10%风险的 6.49 倍。严重受伤(AIS 3-6)的最大相对风险是颈部(367 倍)、面部(15.5 倍)和头部(10.2 倍)。

结论

未系安全带乘客严重受伤的最高相对风险发生在<15 英里/小时的正面碰撞中。大多数碰撞涉及多次撞击和事故序列中的安全气囊展开。使用长填充时间侧帘、附加帘幕展开逻辑、有限的前充气安全气囊放气和更广泛的前内部帘幕覆盖范围可能会解决这些伤害问题。

相似文献

1
Injury risks in frontal crashes by delta V and body region with focus on head injuries in low-speed collisions.正面碰撞中 delta V 和身体区域的伤害风险,重点关注低速碰撞中的头部伤害。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2010 Aug;11(4):382-90. doi: 10.1080/15389581003751623.
2
Biomechanical evaluation of occupant anthropometry during frontal collisions.正面碰撞中驾乘人员人体测量学的生物力学评估
Biomed Sci Instrum. 2007;43:75-80.
3
Effect of airbag deployment on head injuries in severe passenger motor vehicle crashes in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省严重乘用车碰撞事故中安全气囊展开对头部损伤的影响。
J Trauma. 2003 Feb;54(2):266-72. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000038699.47295.2D.
4
Ejection and severe injury risks by crash type and belt use with a focus on rear impacts.碰撞类型和安全带使用与后排碰撞的弹射和重伤风险。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2010 Feb;11(1):79-86. doi: 10.1080/15389580903479186.
5
Severe injury to near- and far-seated occupants in side impacts by crash severity and belt use.碰撞严重程度和安全带使用对近距和远距侧碰乘客的严重伤害。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2010 Feb;11(1):69-78. doi: 10.1080/15389580903479178.
6
Severe-to-fatal injury risks in crashes with two front-seat occupants by seat belt use.安全带使用与两名前排乘客座位的碰撞中严重至致命伤害风险。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2010 Jun;11(3):294-9. doi: 10.1080/15389581003788898.
7
Incidence and severity of head and neck injuries in victims of road traffic crashes: In an economically developed country.道路交通碰撞受害者头颈部损伤的发生率和严重程度:在一个经济发达国家。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2009 Jan;17(1):52-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2008.07.007. Epub 2008 Sep 12.
8
Do seat belts and air bags reduce mortality and injury severity after car accidents?安全带和安全气囊能降低车祸后的死亡率和伤害严重程度吗?
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2011 Mar;40(3):E26-9.
9
Concussion, Diffuse Axonal Injury, and AIS4+ Head Injury in Motor Vehicle Crashes.机动车碰撞中的脑震荡、弥漫性轴索损伤和AIS4+级头部损伤
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(8):747-53. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1013188. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
10
Seat belt use to save face: impact on drivers' body region and nature of injury in motor vehicle crashes.使用安全带保全面子:对机动车碰撞事故中驾驶员身体部位及损伤性质的影响
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(6):605-10. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.999856.

引用本文的文献

1
Disc Injury and Spine Loads in Low-to-Moderate-Severity Frontal Impacts.低至中度严重程度正面碰撞中的椎间盘损伤与脊柱负荷
Ann Biomed Eng. 2025 Jul 19. doi: 10.1007/s10439-025-03808-w.
2
Young adults in motor vehicle collisions in Norway: user safety errors observed in majority of cases with severe or fatal injuries.挪威机动车事故中的年轻成年人:在大多数严重或致命伤害案例中观察到用户安全错误。
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2022 Dec;18(4):456-469. doi: 10.1007/s12024-022-00541-x. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
3
Preferred Sources of Information, Knowledge, and Acceptance of Automated Vehicle Systems: Effects of Gender and Age.
自动化车辆系统信息、知识的首选来源及接受度:性别与年龄的影响
Front Psychol. 2022 May 23;13:806552. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.806552. eCollection 2022.
4
The relationship between road traffic collision dynamics and traumatic brain injury pathology.道路交通碰撞动力学与创伤性脑损伤病理学之间的关系。
Brain Commun. 2022 Feb 12;4(2):fcac033. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac033. eCollection 2022.
5
Effect of Distance to Trauma Centre, Trauma Centre Level, and Trauma Centre Region on Fatal Injuries among Motorcyclists in Taiwan.台湾摩托车骑手致命伤中距离创伤中心、创伤中心级别和创伤中心区域的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 15;18(6):2998. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062998.
6
Evaluating the Effects of Holidays on Road Crash Injuries in the United Kingdom.评估假期对英国道路碰撞伤害的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 1;18(1):280. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010280.
7
Frequency of acute cervical and lumbar pathology in common types of motor vehicle collisions: a retrospective record review.常见类型机动车碰撞中急性颈部和腰部病变的发生率:一项回顾性记录审查
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Nov 9;18(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1797-5.
8
Racial disparities in survival among injured drivers.受伤司机的生存状况存在种族差异。
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Mar 1;177(5):380-7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws242. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
9
Differences in thoracic injury causation patterns between seat belt restrained children and adults.使用安全带的儿童与成人胸部损伤致伤模式的差异。
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2012;56:213-21.