将苛求厌氧菌琼脂与威尔金斯-查尔格伦琼脂、脑心浸液琼脂和布鲁氏菌琼脂用于梭杆菌属药敏试验的比较。
Fastidious anaerobe agar compared with Wilkins-Chalgren agar, brain heart infusion agar, and brucella agar for susceptibility testing of Fusobacterium species.
作者信息
Brazier J S, Goldstein E J, Citron D M, Ostovari M I
机构信息
Anaerobe Reference Unit, Public Health Laboratory, Luton & Dunstable Hospital, England.
出版信息
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Nov;34(11):2280-2. doi: 10.1128/AAC.34.11.2280.
Abstract
Fastidious anaerobe agar supported the growth of 82 strains of fusobacteria better than brain heart infusion agar, brucella agar, and Wilkins-Chalgren agar. Fastidious anaerobe agar showed less hazing and fewer tailing endpoints with beta-lactam antibiotics. Whole-blood supplementation improved the performance of all media. Wilkins-Chalgren agar without blood failed to support the growth of 17% of the strains. All Fusobacterium ulcerans strains were resistant to clindamycin.
摘要
苛求性厌氧菌琼脂比脑心浸液琼脂、布鲁氏菌琼脂和威尔金斯-查尔格伦琼脂更有利于82株梭杆菌的生长。苛求性厌氧菌琼脂在添加β-内酰胺类抗生素时，出现的浑浊现象更少，拖尾终点也更少。全血补充剂改善了所有培养基的性能。不含血液的威尔金斯-查尔格伦琼脂无法支持17%的菌株生长。所有溃疡梭杆菌菌株对克林霉素均耐药。
相似文献
1
Fastidious anaerobe agar compared with Wilkins-Chalgren agar, brain heart infusion agar, and brucella agar for susceptibility testing of Fusobacterium species.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Nov;34(11):2280-2. doi: 10.1128/AAC.34.11.2280.
2
Comparative activity of SCH 34343 against anaerobic bacteria.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1986 Apr;4(4):341-4. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(86)90075-1.
3
Multilaboratory comparison of anaerobe susceptibility results using 3 different agar media.
Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Sep 1;35(Suppl 1):S40-6. doi: 10.1086/341919.
4
Factors affecting antimicrobial susceptibility of Fusobacterium species.
J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Mar;25(3):476-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.3.476-479.1987.
5
Evaluation of two media for antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria using the receiver operating characteristic procedure.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1990 Sep;9(9):667-71. doi: 10.1007/BF01964269.
6
Comparison of anaerobic susceptibility results obtained by different methods.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Mar;15(3):351-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.15.3.351.
7
Comparison of activities of trovafloxacin (CP-99,219) and five other agents against 585 anaerobes with use of three media.
Clin Infect Dis. 1996 Dec;23 Suppl 1:S44-50. doi: 10.1093/clinids/23.supplement_1.s44.
8
Antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in Sweden in 1983.
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1984;43:44-9.
9
Agar medium for use in susceptibility testing of bacteria from human periodontal pockets.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Oct;16(4):452-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.16.4.452.
10
Comparative in vitro activity of 1-oxa-beta-lactam (LY127935) and cefoperazone with other beta-lactam antibiotics against anaerobic bacteria.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Feb;17(2):129-31. doi: 10.1128/AAC.17.2.129.
引用本文的文献
1
In Vitro and In Silico Based Approaches to Identify Potential Novel Bacteriocins from the Athlete Gut Microbiome of an Elite Athlete Cohort.
Microorganisms. 2022 Mar 24;10(4):701. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10040701.
2
Clinical Differences in Patients Infected with and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Isolates Recovered at a Tertiary-Care Hospital in Korea.
Ann Lab Med. 2022 Mar 1;42(2):188-195. doi: 10.3343/alm.2022.42.2.188.
3
beta-lactamase production and antimicrobial susceptibility of oral heterogeneous Fusobacterium nucleatum populations in young children.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999 May;43(5):1270-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.43.5.1270.
4
Evaluation of the E test for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Oct;29(10):2197-203. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.10.2197-2203.1991.
5
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Bilophila wadsworthia by using triphenyltetrazolium chloride to facilitate endpoint determination.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Aug;36(8):1658-64. doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.8.1658.
本文引用的文献
1
Gram-negative anaerobic bacilli: Their role in infection and patterns of susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. II. Little-known Fusobacterium species and miscellaneous genera.
Rev Infect Dis. 1981 May-Jun;3(3):599-626. doi: 10.1093/clinids/3.3.599.
2
Factors affecting antimicrobial susceptibility of Fusobacterium species.
J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Mar;25(3):476-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.3.476-479.1987.
3
Recovery of anaerobic bacteria from clinical specimens in 12 years at two military hospitals.
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Jun;26(6):1181-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.6.1181-1188.1988.
4
Cell-wall-defective variants of Fusobacterium.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Mar;33(3):369-72. doi: 10.1128/AAC.33.3.369.
Zotero 插件