Suppr超能文献

E试验用于厌氧菌药敏试验的评估。

Evaluation of the E test for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

作者信息

Citron D M, Ostovari M I, Karlsson A, Goldstein E J

机构信息

R. M. Alden Research Laboratory, Santa Monica Hospital Medical Center, California 90404.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Oct;29(10):2197-203. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.10.2197-2203.1991.

Abstract

The susceptibilities of 105 clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria were determined by a new method, the E test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden), and were compared with the MICs for these organisms obtained by the reference agar dilution method by using supplemented brucella and Wilkins-Chalgren agars. The E test is a plastic strip with a predefined antibiotic gradient immobilized on one side and a MIC interpretive scale printed on the other side. Strips with cefoxitin, cefotaxime, imipenem, penicillin, metronidazole, and clindamycin were used in this study. A suspension of the test strain equal to the visual turbidity of a no. 0.5 McFarland standard was prepared and swabbed onto a 150-mm-diameter plate. The strips were applied in a radial fashion, and the plates were incubated under anaerobic conditions. After growth had occurred, an ellipse of inhibition was seen around each strip. At the point of intersection of the ellipse with the strip, the MIC was read from the interpretive scale. For most antibiotic-organism combinations, the ellipse was clear and the endpoint was sharp. The E-test MICs were interpreted after overnight and 48-h incubation for 58 of the strains. After overnight incubation, 87% of the E-test MICs were within 1 dilution of the agar dilution MICs, and 98% were within 2 dilutions. After 48 h of incubation, agreement was 86 and 97% respectively. E-test MICs obtained for the Bacteroides fragilis group after overnight incubation were more comparable than those obtained after 48 h of incubation to agar dilution MICs determined at 48 h for all drugs except clindamycin. On brucella agar, there was a 2% categorical discrepancy rate between the E-test MICs and agar dilution MICs, which occurred mostly with cefoxitin. The E test is easy to perform and read, is suitable for all anaerobes, can be used to test single patient isolates as needed, and offers the laboratory a reliable method for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

摘要

采用一种新方法——E试验(AB Biodisk公司,瑞典索尔纳),测定了105株厌氧菌临床分离株的药敏情况,并将其与采用添加了布鲁氏菌的琼脂和威尔金斯-查尔格伦琼脂通过参考琼脂稀释法获得的这些菌株的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)进行比较。E试验条是一种塑料条,一侧固定有预定义的抗生素梯度,另一侧印有MIC解释刻度。本研究使用了含头孢西丁、头孢噻肟、亚胺培南、青霉素、甲硝唑和克林霉素的试条。制备与0.5号麦氏标准液视觉浊度相当的受试菌株悬液,并涂布于直径150mm的平板上。以放射状方式贴加试条,平板在厌氧条件下培养。生长出现后,在每条试条周围可见抑菌椭圆环。在椭圆环与试条的交点处,从解释刻度读取MIC。对于大多数抗生素-菌株组合,椭圆环清晰,终点明显。对58株菌株在过夜培养和48小时培养后解读E试验MIC。过夜培养后,87%的E试验MIC与琼脂稀释法MIC相差在1个稀释度以内,98%相差在2个稀释度以内。48小时培养后,一致性分别为86%和97%。除克林霉素外,过夜培养后获得的脆弱拟杆菌群 E-试验MIC与48小时琼脂稀释法MIC的可比程度高于48小时培养后获得的结果。在布鲁氏菌琼脂上,E试验MIC与琼脂稀释法MIC之间的分类差异率为2%,主要发生在头孢西丁检测中。E试验操作和判读简便,适用于所有厌氧菌,可根据需要用于检测单个患者分离株,为实验室提供了一种可靠的厌氧菌药敏试验方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f7/270297/8d6f4b92beb2/jcm00046-0128-a.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验