• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高体重指数不影响机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术后的结果。

High body mass index does not affect outcomes following robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

作者信息

Moskovic Daniel J, Lavery Hugh J, Rehman Jamil, Nabizada-Pace Fatima, Brajtbord Jonathan, Samadi David B

机构信息

Department of Urology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029, USA.

出版信息

Can J Urol. 2010 Aug;17(4):5291-8.

PMID:20735909
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Given the anatomic constraints of obese patients, concern exists as to whether robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is appropriate in patients with higher body mass index (BMI). We reviewed a large RALP database to determine if clinical outcomes are related to BMI.

METHODS

The records of patients who underwent a RALP from 2003-2009 were reviewed. BMI stratifications were concordant with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) standards: > or = 30, > or = 25 and < 30, and < 25 were classified as obese, overweight, and normal weight, respectively. Baseline, perioperative, histopathologic, and functional outcome data were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 1420 patients were identified and BMI information was available for 1112 patients. Median BMI in the three strata was 23.5 (n = 270), 27.3 (n = 600), and 32.1 (n = 242). There were no significant differences in preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA), clinical staging, and preoperative Gleason scores. Operating time was 6 minutes longer in the obese (p < 0.001) and prostate weight was 8 g greater (p < 0.001). Other perioperative factors were similar, including: EBL, pathologic stage and Gleason score and rates of positive surgical margins. The overall incidence of postoperative complications was similar between the three groups. Biochemical recurrence rates were similar among all patients, although there was a trend toward increased recurrence in the obese (p = 0.09). Recovery of erectile function and continence was similar regardless of BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

RALP is an effective approach to prostatectomy in obese patients as perioperative and functional outcomes are almost identical across BMI strata. This supports the continued utilization of RALP in obese and overweight men.

摘要

引言

鉴于肥胖患者的解剖学限制,对于体重指数(BMI)较高的患者,机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALP)是否合适存在疑虑。我们回顾了一个大型RALP数据库,以确定临床结果是否与BMI相关。

方法

回顾了2003年至2009年接受RALP手术的患者记录。BMI分层与疾病控制中心(CDC)标准一致:≥30、≥25且<30以及<25分别被归类为肥胖、超重和正常体重。收集了基线、围手术期、组织病理学和功能结局数据。

结果

共确定了1420例患者,其中1112例患者有BMI信息。三个分层中的BMI中位数分别为23.5(n = 270)、27.3(n = 600)和32.1(n = 242)。术前前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、临床分期和术前Gleason评分无显著差异。肥胖患者的手术时间长6分钟(p < 0.001),前列腺重量重8克(p < 0.001)。其他围手术期因素相似,包括:估计失血量、病理分期和Gleason评分以及手术切缘阳性率。三组术后并发症的总体发生率相似。所有患者的生化复发率相似,尽管肥胖患者有复发增加的趋势(p = 0.09)。无论BMI如何,勃起功能和控尿功能的恢复相似。

结论

RALP是肥胖患者前列腺切除术的有效方法,因为不同BMI分层的围手术期和功能结局几乎相同。这支持在肥胖和超重男性中继续使用RALP。

相似文献

1
High body mass index does not affect outcomes following robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.高体重指数不影响机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术后的结果。
Can J Urol. 2010 Aug;17(4):5291-8.
2
Does obesity influence the operative course or complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.肥胖是否会影响机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的手术过程或并发症?
BJU Int. 2006 Dec;98(6):1275-8; discussion 1278. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06488.x.
3
Impact of obesity on clinical outcomes in robotic prostatectomy.肥胖对机器人前列腺切除术临床结局的影响。
Urology. 2005 Apr;65(4):740-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.10.061.
4
The influence of body mass index on the cost of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.体重指数对前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术费用的影响。
BJU Int. 2010 Oct;106(8):1188-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09242.x.
5
Robotic radical prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients: oncological and validated-functional outcomes.超重和肥胖患者的机器人根治性前列腺切除术:肿瘤学及经验证的功能结果
Urology. 2009 Feb;73(2):316-22. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.493. Epub 2008 Oct 26.
6
Impact of prostate median lobe anatomy on robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.前列腺中叶解剖结构对机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的影响。
Urology. 2009 Feb;73(2):323-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.484. Epub 2008 Nov 20.
7
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients.超重和肥胖患者的机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术
Urology. 2006 Apr;67(4):774-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.10.049. Epub 2006 Mar 29.
8
Laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy in complex surgical cases.复杂手术病例中的腹腔镜腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术
J Urol. 2007 May;177(5):1765-70. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.034.
9
[Pure laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: comparative study to assess functional urinary outcomes].[单纯腹腔镜与机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术:评估功能性泌尿结局的比较研究]
Prog Urol. 2009 Oct;19(9):611-7. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2009.05.008. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
10
Converting from open to robotic prostatectomy: key concepts.从开放手术转为机器人前列腺切除术:关键概念。
Urol Oncol. 2010 Jan-Feb;28(1):77-80. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.06.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes: robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer patients with visceral obesity.系统评价和荟萃分析:内脏肥胖的胃癌患者行机器人辅助手术与腹腔镜手术的短期结局比较。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 4;18(1):238. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02002-9.
2
Association between body mass index and localized prostate cancer management and disease-specific quality of life.体重指数与局限性前列腺癌管理及疾病特异性生活质量之间的关联。
BJUI Compass. 2022 Nov 2;4(2):223-233. doi: 10.1002/bco2.197. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Obesity leads to a higher rate of positive surgical margins in the context of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Results of a prospective multicenter study.
肥胖在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的情况下会导致更高的手术切缘阳性率。一项前瞻性多中心研究的结果。
Cent European J Urol. 2020;73(4):457-465. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2020.0265.R1. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
4
High surgeon volume and positive surgical margins can predict the risk of biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.高手术医生手术量和手术切缘阳性可预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的风险。
Ther Adv Urol. 2019 Sep 24;11:1756287219878283. doi: 10.1177/1756287219878283. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
5
Surgeon volume and body mass index influence positive surgical margin risk after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Results in 732 cases.外科医生手术量和体重指数对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性风险的影响:732例病例结果
Arab J Urol. 2019 May 30;17(3):234-242. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2019.1619276. eCollection 2019.
6
Risk factors of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-volume center: results in 732 cases.高容量中心机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性的危险因素:732 例结果。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Feb;14(1):167-175. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00954-x. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
7
Clinical factors affecting perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.影响机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术围手术期结局的临床因素。
Mol Clin Oncol. 2018 Nov;9(5):575-581. doi: 10.3892/mco.2018.1718. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
8
Patient-reported quality of life recovery curves after robotic prostatectomy are similar across body mass index categories.机器人前列腺切除术后患者报告的生活质量恢复曲线在身体质量指数类别中相似。
Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Sep;58(5):331-338. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.5.331. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
9
Laparoscopic radical cystectomy.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术
Arab J Urol. 2012 Mar;10(1):40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
10
Risk factors for biochemical recurrence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon experience.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的危险因素:单中心经验
BMC Urol. 2015 Apr 8;15:27. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0024-7.