• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Clinical factors affecting perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.影响机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术围手术期结局的临床因素。
Mol Clin Oncol. 2018 Nov;9(5):575-581. doi: 10.3892/mco.2018.1718. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
2
Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Locally-advanced Prostate Cancer.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术和扩展盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗局部进展期前列腺癌。
Eur Urol. 2017 Feb;71(2):249-256. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 May 18.
3
The role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术在高危前列腺癌治疗中的作用:系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2014 May;65(5):918-27. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.026. Epub 2013 May 18.
4
Pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: efficacy, limitations, and complications-a systematic review of the literature.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术时的盆腔淋巴结清扫术:疗效、局限性和并发症——文献系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):7-16. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.057. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
5
Assessment of lymph node yield after pelvic lymph node dissection in men with prostate cancer: a comparison between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy in the modern era.评估前列腺癌患者行盆腔淋巴结清扫术后的淋巴结检出量:机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与开放根治性前列腺切除术在现代的比较。
J Endourol. 2010 Jul;24(7):1055-60. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0128.
6
Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中高危前列腺癌保留神经的安全性
J Robot Surg. 2017 Jun;11(2):129-138. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0627-3. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
7
Standardized comparison of robot-assisted limited and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer.机器人辅助局限性和广泛性前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结切除术的标准化比较。
BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(1):81-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11788.x. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
8
Extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy: comparison between initial robotic experience of a high-volume open surgeon and his contemporary open series.根治性前列腺切除术中扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术:高年资开放手术医生的初始机器人手术经验与其同期开放手术系列的比较。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019 Dec;71(6):597-604. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03404-0. Epub 2019 May 28.
9
Extended vs standard lymph node dissection in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer: a propensity-score-matching analysis.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗中高危前列腺癌的扩展与标准淋巴结清扫术:倾向评分匹配分析。
BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(2):216-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11765.x. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
10
Safety and feasibility of outpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.门诊机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的安全性与可行性
J Robot Surg. 2019 Apr;13(2):261-265. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0848-8. Epub 2018 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimated Blood Loss as a Predictor of Postoperative Continence and Oncologic Outcomes in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Analysis of 525 Cases.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中估计失血量作为术后控尿和肿瘤学结局预测指标的回顾性分析:525例病例研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18175-y.
2
BMI Impact on Readmissions for Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Monocentric, Single-Surgeon Serial Analysis of 500 Cases.体重指数对接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者再入院率的影响:一项针对500例病例的单中心、单外科医生的系列分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 7;12(12):3908. doi: 10.3390/jcm12123908.
3
Validation of user-friendly models predicting extracapsular extension in prostate cancer patients.预测前列腺癌患者包膜外侵犯的用户友好型模型的验证
Asian J Urol. 2023 Jan;10(1):81-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.02.008. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
4
The 'prostate-muscle index': a simple pelvic cavity measurement predicting estimated blood loss and console time in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.“前列腺-肌肉指数”:一种简单的盆腔测量指标,可预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的估计出血量和控制台时间。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 13;12(1):11945. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16202-6.
5
The Effect of Adverse Patient Characteristics on Perioperative Outcomes in Open and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.不良患者特征对开放性和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术围手术期结局的影响。
Front Surg. 2020 Nov 10;7:584897. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.584897. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Role of radical prostatectomy in metastatic prostate cancer: A review.根治性前列腺切除术在转移性前列腺癌中的作用:综述
Urol Oncol. 2017 Apr;35(4):125-134. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
2
Cancer Statistics, 2017.《2017 年癌症统计》
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
3
The Differential Impact of Body Mass Index and the Feature of Metabolic Syndrome on Oncological Outcomes Following Different Surgical Procedures in Japanese Men with Prostate Cancer.体重指数和代谢综合征特征对日本前列腺癌男性患者不同手术后肿瘤学结局的差异影响
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 May;24(5):1443-1450. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5705-2. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
4
Impact of Obesity on Wound Complications Following Radical Prostatectomy Is Mitigated by Robotic Technique.机器人技术可减轻肥胖对根治性前列腺切除术后伤口并发症的影响。
J Endourol. 2016 Aug;30(8):890-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0282. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
5
The feature of metabolic syndrome is a risk factor for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.代谢综合征的特征是前列腺癌根治术后生化复发的一个危险因素。
J Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;110(4):476-81. doi: 10.1002/jso.23677. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
6
The status of surgery in the management of high-risk prostate cancer.高危前列腺癌的外科治疗现状。
Nat Rev Urol. 2014 Jun;11(6):342-51. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.100. Epub 2014 May 13.
7
Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy in the postdissemination era.机器人辅助与开放根治性前列腺切除术在传播后时代的比较效果。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 10;32(14):1419-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5096. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
8
Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.早期前列腺癌行前列腺根治性切除术或密切观察。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 6;370(10):932-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1311593.
9
Perioperative and early oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in morbidly obese patients: a propensity score-matched study.肥胖患者机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)的围手术期和早期肿瘤学结果:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
BJU Int. 2014 Jan;113(1):84-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2013.11798.x. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
10
Advantages of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in obese patients: comparison with the open procedure.肥胖患者行机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的优势:与开放手术的比较。
Korean J Urol. 2012 Aug;53(8):536-40. doi: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.8.536. Epub 2012 Aug 16.

影响机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术围手术期结局的临床因素。

Clinical factors affecting perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Murakami Tomohiko, Otsubo Satoshi, Namitome Ryo, Shiota Masaki, Inokuchi Junichi, Takeuchi Ario, Kashiwagi Eiji, Tatsugami Katsunori, Eto Masatoshi

机构信息

Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.

出版信息

Mol Clin Oncol. 2018 Nov;9(5):575-581. doi: 10.3892/mco.2018.1718. Epub 2018 Sep 13.

DOI:10.3892/mco.2018.1718
PMID:30279989
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6166268/
Abstract

The present study investigated clinical factors affecting perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). The study included 625 Japanese cases treated with RARP between 2009 and 2017. The association between clinical factors (age, overweight status, prostate volume, clinical T-stage, nerve sparing, lympho-node dissection, and the number of experienced cases) and perioperative outcomes (operation time, estimated blood loss, catheterization duration, and perioperative complication) were analyzed. Results revealed that overweight status, prostate volume, lymph-node dissection, and the number of experienced cases were associated with operation time. For estimated blood loss, the identified risk factors were overweight status, prostate volume, nerve sparing, lymph-node dissection, and the number of experienced cases. Lymph-node dissection and the number of experienced cases were also associated with catheterization duration. Additionally, only lymph-node dissection was associated with increased perioperative complication. Taken together, the present study identified several clinical factors affecting perioperative outcomes in RARP. This information may help surgeons to estimate perioperative outcomes as well as to inform patients.

摘要

本研究调查了影响机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)围手术期结局的临床因素。该研究纳入了2009年至2017年间接受RARP治疗的625例日本患者。分析了临床因素(年龄、超重状态、前列腺体积、临床T分期、保留神经、淋巴结清扫以及术者经验例数)与围手术期结局(手术时间、估计失血量、导尿持续时间和围手术期并发症)之间的关联。结果显示,超重状态、前列腺体积、淋巴结清扫以及术者经验例数与手术时间相关。对于估计失血量,确定的危险因素为超重状态、前列腺体积、保留神经、淋巴结清扫以及术者经验例数。淋巴结清扫和术者经验例数也与导尿持续时间相关。此外,仅淋巴结清扫与围手术期并发症增加相关。综上所述,本研究确定了影响RARP围手术期结局的若干临床因素。这些信息可能有助于外科医生评估围手术期结局并告知患者。