Suppr超能文献

实验室检测产肠毒素性产气荚膜梭菌的效能

Efficacy of laboratory tests for the detection of enterotoxigenic Clostridium perfringens.

作者信息

Niilo L

出版信息

Can J Microbiol. 1978 May;24(5):633-5. doi: 10.1139/m78-106.

Abstract

Nineteen Clostridium perfringens strains with positive erythemal and ligated intestinal loop reactions, and 22 strains with negative reactions, originating from food-poisoning cases, were tested comparatively using the fluorescent antibody (FA), reversed passive hemagglutination (RPHA), and immunodiffusion (ID) tests. All the biologically positive strains were detected by the three immunological tests used. The FA test detected five additional strains among the biologically negative group which did not react in RPHA or ID tests. Sporulating culture supernatant fluids, after 13 to 17h of growth, were satisfactory for testing for the presence of enterotoxin by the RPHA and ID tests. The FA test was used on cell smears.

摘要

对19株来自食物中毒病例、红斑和结扎肠袢反应呈阳性的产气荚膜梭菌菌株,以及22株反应呈阴性的菌株,采用荧光抗体(FA)、反向被动血凝(RPHA)和免疫扩散(ID)试验进行了比较检测。所有生物学阳性菌株均能被所采用的三种免疫试验检测到。FA试验在生物学阴性组中检测到另外5株在RPHA或ID试验中无反应的菌株。生长13至17小时后的芽孢形成培养上清液,用于通过RPHA和ID试验检测肠毒素的存在效果良好。FA试验用于细胞涂片检测。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验