Suppr超能文献

用于检测与牲畜相关的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的伯乐 MRSASelectTM 培养基的临床评估。

Clinical evaluation of Bio-Rad MRSASelect™ medium for the detection of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

机构信息

St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 Jan;30(1):109-12. doi: 10.1007/s10096-010-1035-7. Epub 2010 Aug 27.

Abstract

Bio-Rad MRSASelect™ medium was evaluated for its ability to recover methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from nasal samples of pig farmers and their household members. In total, 257 samples were inoculated on Bio-Rad MRSASelect™ medium with and without broth enrichment and on bioMérieux MRSA ID with broth enrichment. A sample was considered to be positive if at least one of the media grew MRSA. The sensitivity of Bio-Rad MRSASelect™ medium without broth enrichment was 63.9%. With broth enrichment, the sensitivity increased to 98.4%. The specificity was 95.4% both with and without broth enrichment. In conclusion, Bio-Rad MRSASelect™ medium as well as MRSA ID medium are reliable methods to detect MRSA carriage when used in combination with broth enrichment. The directly inoculated MRSASelect™ medium was statistically significantly less sensitive than the two media after broth enrichment.

摘要

Bio-Rad MRSASelect™ 培养基用于从养猪户及其家庭成员的鼻腔样本中检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌 (MRSA) 的能力。共接种了 257 个样本,分别接种在含有和不含有肉汤增菌的 Bio-Rad MRSASelect™ 培养基和 bioMérieux MRSA ID 培养基上,同时进行肉汤增菌。如果至少有一种培养基生长出 MRSA,则认为该样本为阳性。未经肉汤增菌的 Bio-Rad MRSASelect™ 培养基的灵敏度为 63.9%。经肉汤增菌后,灵敏度提高到 98.4%。无论是否进行肉汤增菌,特异性均为 95.4%。综上所述,当与肉汤增菌结合使用时,Bio-Rad MRSASelect™ 培养基和 MRSA ID 培养基都是可靠的检测 MRSA 携带的方法。经肉汤增菌后,直接接种的 MRSASelect™ 培养基的灵敏度明显低于两种增菌后的培养基。

相似文献

1
Clinical evaluation of Bio-Rad MRSASelect™ medium for the detection of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 Jan;30(1):109-12. doi: 10.1007/s10096-010-1035-7. Epub 2010 Aug 27.
5
Evaluation of brilliance MRSA 2 agar for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in clinical samples.
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Mar;51(3):1026-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02995-12. Epub 2013 Jan 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in people living and working in pig farms.
Epidemiol Infect. 2009 May;137(5):700-8. doi: 10.1017/S0950268808001507. Epub 2008 Oct 24.
3
Evaluation of four selective agars and two enrichment broths in screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Sep;46(9):3136-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00478-08. Epub 2008 Jul 16.
4
Emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus of animal origin in humans.
Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Dec;13(12):1834-9. doi: 10.3201/eid1312.070384.
5
Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among veterinarians: an international study.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008 Jan;14(1):29-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01873.x. Epub 2007 Nov 6.
8
Evaluation of MRSA Select, a new chromogenic medium for the detection of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006 Jun;27(6):561-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.03.011. Epub 2006 May 11.
9
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pig farming.
Emerg Infect Dis. 2005 Dec;11(12):1965-6. doi: 10.3201/eid1112.050428.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验