Hunt Michael A, Bennell Kim L
Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Knee. 2011 Aug;18(4):231-4. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2010.05.014. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
Knee joint loading, as measured by the knee adduction moment (KAM), has been implicated in the pathogenesis of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Given that the KAM can only currently be accurately measured in the laboratory setting with sophisticated and expensive equipment, its utility in the clinical setting is limited. This study aimed to determine the ability of a combination of four clinical measures to predict KAM values. Three-dimensional motion analysis was used to calculate the peak KAM at a self-selected walking speed in 47 consecutive individuals with medial compartment knee OA and varus malalignment. Clinical predictors included: body mass; tibial angle measured using an inclinometer; walking speed; and visually observed trunk lean toward the affected limb during the stance phase of walking. Multiple linear regression was performed to predict KAM magnitudes using the four clinical measures. A regression model including body mass (41% explained variance), tibial angle (17% explained variance), and walking speed (9% explained variance) explained a total of 67% of variance in the peak KAM. Our study demonstrates that a set of measures easily obtained in the clinical setting (body mass, tibial alignment, and walking speed) can help predict the KAM in people with medial knee OA. Identifying those patients who are more likely to experience high medial knee loads could assist clinicians in deciding whether load-modifying interventions may be appropriate for patients, whilst repeated assessment of joint load could provide a mechanism to monitor disease progression or success of treatment.
膝关节负荷,通过膝关节内收力矩(KAM)来衡量,与膝关节骨关节炎(OA)的发病机制有关。鉴于目前KAM只能在实验室环境中使用复杂且昂贵的设备进行精确测量,其在临床环境中的实用性有限。本研究旨在确定四种临床测量方法组合预测KAM值的能力。采用三维运动分析来计算47例连续的内侧间室膝关节OA和内翻畸形患者在自选步行速度下的峰值KAM。临床预测指标包括:体重;使用倾角仪测量的胫骨角;步行速度;以及在步行站立期肉眼观察到的躯干向患侧倾斜情况。使用这四种临床测量方法进行多元线性回归以预测KAM大小。一个包括体重(解释方差41%)、胫骨角(解释方差17%)和步行速度(解释方差9%)的回归模型总共解释了峰值KAM中67%的方差。我们的研究表明,一组在临床环境中容易获得的测量方法(体重、胫骨对线和步行速度)可以帮助预测内侧膝关节OA患者的KAM。识别那些更可能承受高内侧膝关节负荷的患者可以帮助临床医生决定负荷调整干预措施是否适合患者,同时对关节负荷的重复评估可以提供一种监测疾病进展或治疗效果的机制。