Suppr超能文献

注意力缺陷多动障碍混合型及主要为注意力不集中型亚型的标准化观察评估。II. 课堂观察。

Standardized Observational Assessment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Combined and Predominantly Inattentive Subtypes. II. Classroom Observations.

作者信息

McConaughy Stephanie H, Ivanova Masha Y, Antshel Kevin, Eiraldi Ricardo B, Dumenci Levent

机构信息

University of Vermont.

出版信息

School Psych Rev. 2009 Jul 1;38(3):362-381.

Abstract

Trained classroom observers used the Direct Observation Form (DOF; McConaughy & Achenbach, 2009) to rate observations of 163 6- to 11-year-old children in their school classrooms. Participants were assigned to four groups based on a parent diagnostic interview and parent and teacher rating scales: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)-Combined type (n = 64); ADHD-Inattentive type (n = 22); clinically referred without ADHD (n = 51); and nonreferred control children (n = 26). The ADHD-Combined group scored significantly higher than the referred without ADHD group and controls on the DOF Intrusive and Oppositional syndromes, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Problems scale, Hyperactivity-Impulsivity subscale, and Total Problems; and significantly lower on the DOF On-Task score. The ADHD-Inattentive group scored significantly higher than controls on the DOF Sluggish Cognitive Tempo and Attention Problems syndromes, Inattention subscale, and Total Problems; and significantly lower on the DOF On-Task score. Implications are discussed regarding the discriminative validity of standardized classroom observations for identifying children with ADHD and differentiating between the two ADHD subtypes.

摘要

训练有素的课堂观察员使用直接观察表(DOF;McConaughy和Achenbach,2009)对163名6至11岁儿童在学校课堂上的表现进行评分。根据家长诊断访谈以及家长和教师评分量表,将参与者分为四组:注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)合并型(n = 64);ADHD注意力不集中型(n = 22);临床转诊但无ADHD的儿童(n = 51);以及未转诊的对照儿童(n = 26)。ADHD合并型组在DOF的侵扰和对立综合征、注意力缺陷多动问题量表、多动-冲动子量表和总问题上的得分显著高于未患ADHD的转诊组和对照组;而在DOF的专注任务得分上显著更低。ADHD注意力不集中型组在DOF的认知迟缓节奏和注意力问题综合征、注意力不集中子量表和总问题上的得分显著高于对照组;在DOF的专注任务得分上也显著更低。文中讨论了标准化课堂观察对于识别ADHD儿童以及区分两种ADHD亚型的判别效度的相关影响。

相似文献

6
7
Evaluating the utility of sluggish cognitive tempo in discriminating among DSM-IV ADHD subtypes.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2010 Feb;38(2):173-84. doi: 10.1007/s10802-009-9355-8.
8
Regional brain network organization distinguishes the combined and inattentive subtypes of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 May 22;15:383-390. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.05.016. eCollection 2017.
9
Psychiatric comorbidity associated with DSM-IV ADHD in a nonreferred sample of twins.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999 Nov;38(11):1355-62. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199911000-00009.
10
Patterns of comorbidity associated with subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder among 6- to 12-year-old children.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997 Apr;36(4):503-14. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199704000-00013.

本文引用的文献

2
Neurocognitive functioning in AD/HD, predominantly inattentive and combined subtypes.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2007 Oct;35(5):729-44. doi: 10.1007/s10802-007-9123-6. Epub 2007 Jul 14.
3
Test of significance for a series of statistical tests.
Psychol Bull. 1954 Mar;51(2:1):172-5. doi: 10.1037/h0059991.
4
Observed classroom behavior of children with ADHD: relationship to gender and comorbidity.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2002 Aug;30(4):349-59. doi: 10.1023/a:1015713807297.
5
ADHD comorbidity findings from the MTA study: comparing comorbid subgroups.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;40(2):147-58. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200102000-00009.
6
Parent-teacher concordance for DSM-IV attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a clinic-referred sample.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000 Mar;39(3):308-13. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200003000-00012.
8
Reliability and validity of the Direct Observation Form of the Child Behavior Checklist.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1983 Dec;11(4):521-30. doi: 10.1007/BF00917081.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验