McConaughy Stephanie H, Ivanova Masha Y, Antshel Kevin, Eiraldi Ricardo B, Dumenci Levent
University of Vermont.
School Psych Rev. 2009 Jul 1;38(3):362-381.
Trained classroom observers used the Direct Observation Form (DOF; McConaughy & Achenbach, 2009) to rate observations of 163 6- to 11-year-old children in their school classrooms. Participants were assigned to four groups based on a parent diagnostic interview and parent and teacher rating scales: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)-Combined type (n = 64); ADHD-Inattentive type (n = 22); clinically referred without ADHD (n = 51); and nonreferred control children (n = 26). The ADHD-Combined group scored significantly higher than the referred without ADHD group and controls on the DOF Intrusive and Oppositional syndromes, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Problems scale, Hyperactivity-Impulsivity subscale, and Total Problems; and significantly lower on the DOF On-Task score. The ADHD-Inattentive group scored significantly higher than controls on the DOF Sluggish Cognitive Tempo and Attention Problems syndromes, Inattention subscale, and Total Problems; and significantly lower on the DOF On-Task score. Implications are discussed regarding the discriminative validity of standardized classroom observations for identifying children with ADHD and differentiating between the two ADHD subtypes.
训练有素的课堂观察员使用直接观察表(DOF;McConaughy和Achenbach,2009)对163名6至11岁儿童在学校课堂上的表现进行评分。根据家长诊断访谈以及家长和教师评分量表,将参与者分为四组:注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)合并型(n = 64);ADHD注意力不集中型(n = 22);临床转诊但无ADHD的儿童(n = 51);以及未转诊的对照儿童(n = 26)。ADHD合并型组在DOF的侵扰和对立综合征、注意力缺陷多动问题量表、多动-冲动子量表和总问题上的得分显著高于未患ADHD的转诊组和对照组;而在DOF的专注任务得分上显著更低。ADHD注意力不集中型组在DOF的认知迟缓节奏和注意力问题综合征、注意力不集中子量表和总问题上的得分显著高于对照组;在DOF的专注任务得分上也显著更低。文中讨论了标准化课堂观察对于识别ADHD儿童以及区分两种ADHD亚型的判别效度的相关影响。