Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2010 Sep;10(3):349-56. doi: 10.3758/CABN.10.3.349.
It has been suggested that cognitive conflicts require effortful processing and, therefore, are aversive (Botvinick, 2007). In the present study, we compared conflicts emerging from the inhibition of a predominant response tendency in a go/no-go task with those between incompatible response activations in a Simon task in a within-subjects design, using the same type of stimuli. Whereas no-go trials elicited reduced skin conductance and pupillometric responses, but prolonged corrugator muscle activity, as compared with go trials, incompatible and compatible Simon trials were indistinguishable with respect to these parameters. Furthermore, the conflict-sensitive N2 components of the event-related brain potential were similar in amplitude, but showed significantly different scalp distributions, indicating dissociable neural generator systems. The present findings suggest the involvement of different emotional and cognitive processes in both types of cognitive conflicts-none being aversive, however. In addition, the N2 findings call into question claims of common monitoring systems for all kinds of cognitive conflicts.
有人认为认知冲突需要费力的处理,因此是令人厌恶的(Botvinick,2007)。在本研究中,我们在一个内隐设计中,使用相同类型的刺激,比较了在 Go/No-Go 任务中抑制主要反应倾向所产生的冲突,以及在 Simon 任务中不兼容反应激活之间的冲突。与 Go 试验相比,No-Go 试验诱发的皮肤电导率和瞳孔测量反应减少,但皱眉肌活动延长,但在这些参数上,不兼容和兼容的 Simon 试验没有区别。此外,事件相关脑电位的冲突敏感 N2 成分在幅度上相似,但头皮分布明显不同,表明存在可分离的神经发生器系统。本研究结果表明,两种类型的认知冲突都涉及不同的情绪和认知过程——然而,没有一种是令人厌恶的。此外,N2 的发现质疑了所有类型的认知冲突都有共同监测系统的说法。