• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单次接触后的选择性信息寻求。

Selective information seeking after a single encounter.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 2010 Sep;46(5):1380-4. doi: 10.1037/a0019818.

DOI:10.1037/a0019818
PMID:20822247
Abstract

In 3 experiments, the authors examined whether a single act of testimony can inform children's subsequent information seeking. In Experiment 1, participants saw one informant give a correct and another informant give an incorrect answer to a question, assessed who was right (wrong), and decided to whom to address a 2nd question. Adults and 7-year-olds but not 4-year-olds selected the previously correct informant. In Experiment 2, after assessing which informant was (not) very good at answering, even 4-year-olds selected the previously correct informant. In Experiment 3, in the absence of external demands to evaluate the informants, 7-year-olds and adults still selected the previously correct informant. Thus, a single encounter is sufficient for 7-year-olds and adults to engage in selective information seeking and trait labels enable 4-year-olds to do so too.

摘要

在三个实验中,作者考察了单次证言是否能告知儿童随后的信息寻求。在实验 1 中,参与者看到一个信息提供者给出正确答案,而另一个信息提供者给出错误答案,评估谁是对的(错的),并决定向谁提出第二个问题。成年人和 7 岁儿童但不是 4 岁儿童选择了之前正确的信息提供者。在实验 2 中,在评估了哪个信息提供者(不)擅长回答问题之后,即使是 4 岁儿童也选择了之前正确的信息提供者。在实验 3 中,在没有外部要求评估信息提供者的情况下,7 岁儿童和成年人仍然选择了之前正确的信息提供者。因此,单次接触足以使 7 岁儿童和成年人进行有选择性的信息寻求,并且特征标签使 4 岁儿童也能够这样做。

相似文献

1
Selective information seeking after a single encounter.单次接触后的选择性信息寻求。
Dev Psychol. 2010 Sep;46(5):1380-4. doi: 10.1037/a0019818.
2
In the absence of conflicting testimony young children trust inaccurate informants.在没有相互矛盾的证词的情况下,幼儿会信任不准确的告密者。
Dev Sci. 2014 May;17(3):443-51. doi: 10.1111/desc.12134. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
3
When being right is not enough: four-year-olds distinguish knowledgeable informants from merely accurate informants.当正确还不够:四岁儿童能够区分有知识的信息提供者和仅仅准确的信息提供者。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Oct;22(10):1250-3. doi: 10.1177/0956797611416998. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
4
Gaining knowledge via other minds: children's flexible trust in others as sources of information.通过他人获取知识:儿童对他人作为信息来源的灵活信任。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2011 Nov;29(Pt 4):961-80. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02036.x. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
5
Children assess informant reliability using bystanders' non-verbal cues.儿童通过旁观者的非语言线索来评估信息提供者的可靠性。
Dev Sci. 2008 Sep;11(5):771-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00728.x.
6
Determining who to question, what to ask, and how much information to ask for: the development of inquiry in young children.确定询问谁、问什么以及询问多少信息:幼儿探究能力的发展。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Dec;110(4):539-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
7
Five-year-olds are willing, but 4-year-olds refuse, to trust informants who offer new and unfamiliar labels for parts of the body.5 岁的儿童愿意信任提供身体部位新的不熟悉标签的信息提供者,而 4 岁的儿童则拒绝信任。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Oct;116(2):234-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
8
Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.儿童的问题:一种认知发展机制。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x.
9
Developmental differences in the relative weighing of informants' social attributes.发展过程中,信息提供者社会属性的相对权重存在差异。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Mar;49(3):602-13. doi: 10.1037/a0031674. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
10
Developmental characteristics of visual cognitive function during childhood according to exploratory eye movements.基于探索性眼动的儿童期视觉认知功能发育特征
Brain Dev. 2009 Nov;31(10):750-7. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2008.12.002. Epub 2009 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Children's Trait Inference and Partner Choice in a Cooperative Game.合作游戏中儿童的特质推断与伙伴选择
Child Dev. 2025 Jul-Aug;96(4):1458-1473. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14247. Epub 2025 Apr 12.
2
Epistemic trust: a comprehensive review of empirical insights and implications for developmental psychopathology.认知信任:对实证见解及对发展性精神病理学影响的全面综述
Res Psychother. 2023 Dec 20;26(3):704. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2023.704.
3
Helpers or halos: examining the evaluative mechanisms underlying selective prosociality.帮助者还是光环效应:探究选择性亲社会行为背后的评价机制
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Apr 5;10(4):221188. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221188. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
(In)Sensitivity to Accuracy? Children's and Adults' Decisions About Who to Trust: The Teacher or the Internet.对准确性的(不)敏感?儿童和成人关于信任对象的决策:教师还是互联网。
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 28;11:551131. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.551131. eCollection 2020.
5
What I don't know won't hurt you: The relation between professed ignorance and later knowledge claims.我不知道的事不会伤害到你:宣称的无知与后来的知识主张之间的关系。
Dev Psychol. 2017 May;53(5):826-835. doi: 10.1037/dev0000294. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
6
Parameterizing developmental changes in epistemic trust.参数化认知信任中的发展变化。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):277-306. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1082-x.
7
Theory of mind selectively predicts preschoolers' knowledge-based selective word learning.心理理论选择性地预测学龄前儿童基于知识的选择性词汇学习。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2015 Nov;33(4):464-75. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12107. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
8
Children's use of communicative intent in the selection of cooperative partners.儿童在选择合作伙伴时对交际意图的使用。
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 23;8(4):e61804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061804. Print 2013.
9
Knowing when to doubt: developing a critical stance when learning from others. 知道何时质疑:从他人学习时培养批判性立场。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Mar;49(3):404-18. doi: 10.1037/a0029500. Epub 2012 Aug 13.