• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对患有对立违抗障碍的青春期前男孩的治疗评估:一项复制的单病例时间序列设计。

Therapeutic assessment for preadolescent boys with oppositional defiant disorder: a replicated single-case time-series design.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2010 Sep;22(3):593-602. doi: 10.1037/a0019697.

DOI:10.1037/a0019697
PMID:20822271
Abstract

The Therapeutic Assessment (TA) model is a relatively new treatment approach that fuses assessment and psychotherapy. The study examines the efficacy of this model with preadolescent boys with oppositional defiant disorder and their families. A replicated single-case time-series design with daily measures is used to assess the effects of TA and to track the process of change as it unfolds. All 3 families benefitted from participation in TA across multiple domains of functioning, but the way in which change unfolded was unique for each family. These findings are substantiated by the Behavior Assessment System for Children (Reynolds & Kamphaus, 2004). The TA model is shown to be an effective treatment for preadolescent boys with oppositional defiant disorder and their families. Further, the time-series design of this study illustrated how this empirically grounded case-based methodology reveals when and how change unfolds during treatment in a way that is usually not possible with other research designs.

摘要

治疗性评估(TA)模型是一种相对较新的治疗方法,它将评估和心理治疗融合在一起。本研究考察了该模型对具有对立违抗性障碍的青春期前男孩及其家庭的疗效。采用复制的单一案例时间序列设计和每日测量来评估 TA 的效果,并跟踪变化的过程。所有 3 个家庭都从 TA 的参与中受益于多个功能领域,但变化的展开方式对每个家庭都是独特的。这些发现得到了《儿童行为评估系统》(Reynolds & Kamphaus,2004)的支持。TA 模型被证明是一种治疗对立违抗性障碍的青春期前男孩及其家庭的有效方法。此外,本研究的时间序列设计说明了这种基于实证的基于案例的方法如何在治疗过程中揭示变化发生的时间和方式,这在其他研究设计中通常是不可能的。

相似文献

1
Therapeutic assessment for preadolescent boys with oppositional defiant disorder: a replicated single-case time-series design.针对患有对立违抗障碍的青春期前男孩的治疗评估:一项复制的单病例时间序列设计。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Sep;22(3):593-602. doi: 10.1037/a0019697.
2
Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents who have a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍的儿童和青少年的健康相关生活质量。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e541-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0844.
3
A modified DBT skills training program for oppositional defiant adolescents: promising preliminary findings.针对对立违抗青少年的改良辩证行为疗法技能培训项目:初步的有前景的研究结果。
Behav Res Ther. 2006 Dec;44(12):1811-20. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.01.004. Epub 2006 Mar 31.
4
Atomoxetine for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and oppositional defiant disorder.托莫西汀用于治疗注意缺陷/多动障碍和对立违抗障碍。
Pediatrics. 2008 Feb;121(2):e314-20. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1880.
5
[Family functioning and psychosocial characteristics in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with comorbid oppositional defiant disorder or conduct disorder].[患有注意力缺陷多动障碍合并对立违抗障碍或品行障碍儿童的家庭功能及心理社会特征]
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2005 Spring;16(1):21-8.
6
Childhood disruptive behaviors and family functioning in clinically referred children: are girls different from boys?临床转诊儿童的童年破坏性行为与家庭功能:女孩与男孩有差异吗?
Scand J Psychol. 2007 Oct;48(5):375-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00617.x.
7
Outcomes of parent-child interaction therapy: mothers' reports of maintenance three to six years after treatment.亲子互动疗法的治疗效果:母亲对治疗三至六年后维持情况的报告。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2003 Sep;32(3):419-29. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP3203_10.
8
Efficacy and safety of mixed amphetamine salts extended release (adderall XR) in the management of oppositional defiant disorder with or without comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in school-aged children and adolescents: A 4-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, forced-dose-escalation study.缓释混合苯丙胺盐(安非他明XR)治疗学龄儿童和青少年对立违抗性障碍(伴或不伴注意力缺陷多动障碍共病)的疗效和安全性:一项为期4周的多中心、随机、双盲、平行组、安慰剂对照、强制剂量递增研究。
Clin Ther. 2006 Mar;28(3):402-18. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.03.006.
9
Comorbidity, case complexity, and effects of evidence-based treatment for children referred for disruptive behavior.共病、病例复杂性以及针对被转诊的破坏性行为儿童的循证治疗效果
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Jun;74(3):455-67. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.455.
10
Oppositional defiant disorder.对立违抗障碍
Am Fam Physician. 2008 Oct 1;78(7):861-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-guided online therapeutic assessment in substance abuse care: A Conflict Analysis implementation and feasibility case study.物质滥用护理中的自我引导式在线治疗评估:冲突分析实施与可行性案例研究
Comput Hum Behav Rep. 2022 May;6. doi: 10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100178.
2
Trainee and Client Experiences of Therapeutic Assessment in a Required Graduate Course: A Qualitative Analysis.研究生必修课程中治疗性评估的学员与客户体验:一项定性分析
J Pers Assess. 2017 Mar-Apr;99(2):126-135. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1077336. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
3
Family check-up effects across diverse ethnic groups: reducing early-adolescence antisocial behavior by reducing family conflict.
不同族裔群体中的家庭检查效果:通过减少家庭冲突来减少青少年早期的反社会行为。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2014;43(3):400-14. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2014.888670. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
4
Therapeutic Assessment of Complex Trauma: A Single-Case Time-Series Study.复杂创伤的治疗评估:一项单病例时间序列研究。
Clin Case Stud. 2013 Jun 1;12(3):228-245. doi: 10.1177/1534650113479442.
5
Indirect effects of fidelity to the family check-up on changes in parenting and early childhood problem behaviors.家庭检查的依从性对育儿方式变化和幼儿问题行为的间接影响。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Dec;81(6):962-74. doi: 10.1037/a0033950. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
6
An updated statement for the Clinical Case Applications section: suggestions for clinical and empirical case reports.临床病例应用部分的更新声明:临床及实证病例报告建议
J Pers Assess. 2013;95(5):437-43. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.810154. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
7
Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards.单病例实验设计:已发表研究和现行标准的系统评价。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Dec;17(4):510-50. doi: 10.1037/a0029312. Epub 2012 Jul 30.