• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭检查的依从性对育儿方式变化和幼儿问题行为的间接影响。

Indirect effects of fidelity to the family check-up on changes in parenting and early childhood problem behaviors.

作者信息

Smith Justin D, Dishion Thomas J, Shaw Daniel S, Wilson Melvin N

机构信息

Child and Family Center, University of Oregon.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Dec;81(6):962-74. doi: 10.1037/a0033950. Epub 2013 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1037/a0033950
PMID:23895087
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3852198/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study examines observations of client in-session engagement and fidelity of implementation to the Family Check-Up (FCU) as they relate to improvements in caregivers' positive behavior support (PBS) and children's problem behavior in the context of a randomized prevention trial. The psychometric properties of fidelity scores obtained with a new rating system are also explored.

METHOD

The FCU feedback sessions of 79 families with children with elevated problem behavior scores at age 2 were coded by trained raters of fidelity, who used an observational coding system developed specifically for this intervention model.

RESULTS

Path analysis indicated that fidelity to the FCU results in greater caregiver engagement in the feedback session, which directly predicts improvements in caregivers' PBS 1 year later (β = 0.06, 95% CI [.007, .129]). Similarly, engagement and PBS directly predict reductions in children's problem behavior measured 2 years later (β = -0.24, 95% CI [-.664, -.019]).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest fidelity within the context of this randomized intervention trial. Ratings of fidelity to the FCU covary with observed improvements in parenting and children's problem behavior in early childhood. Overall reliability of the fidelity scores was found to be acceptable, but some single-item reliability estimates were low, suggesting revisions to the rating system might be needed. Accurately assessing fidelity and understanding its relationship to change during intervention studies is an underdeveloped area of research and has revealed some inconsistent findings. Our results shed light on the mixed conclusions of previous studies, suggesting that future research ought to assess the role of intervening variable effects, such as observed engagement.

摘要

目的

本研究考察了在一项随机预防试验背景下,客户在治疗过程中的参与度以及对家庭检查(FCU)实施的保真度,因为它们与照顾者积极行为支持(PBS)的改善以及儿童问题行为有关。还探讨了使用新评分系统获得的保真度分数的心理测量特性。

方法

对79个孩子在2岁时问题行为得分较高的家庭的FCU反馈会议,由经过培训的保真度评分者进行编码,他们使用专门为该干预模型开发的观察编码系统。

结果

路径分析表明,对FCU的保真度会导致照顾者在反馈会议中更多地参与,这直接预测了1年后照顾者PBS的改善(β = 0.06,95%可信区间[.007,.129])。同样,参与度和PBS直接预测了2年后测量的儿童问题行为的减少(β = -0.24,95%可信区间[-.664,-.019])。

结论

这些结果表明了在该随机干预试验背景下的保真度。对FCU的保真度评分与幼儿期养育和儿童问题行为的观察改善相关。发现保真度分数的总体可靠性是可以接受的,但一些单项可靠性估计较低,表明可能需要对评分系统进行修订。在干预研究中准确评估保真度并理解其与变化的关系是一个未充分发展的研究领域,并且已经揭示了一些不一致的发现。我们的结果揭示了先前研究的混合结论,表明未来的研究应该评估干预变量效应的作用,例如观察到的参与度。

相似文献

1
Indirect effects of fidelity to the family check-up on changes in parenting and early childhood problem behaviors.家庭检查的依从性对育儿方式变化和幼儿问题行为的间接影响。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Dec;81(6):962-74. doi: 10.1037/a0033950. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
2
Effectiveness and Efficiency of Observationally Assessing Fidelity to a Family-Centered Child Intervention: A Quasi-Experimental Study.观察评估家庭为中心的儿童干预措施忠实度的有效性和效率:一项准实验研究。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019 Jan-Feb;48(1):16-28. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2018.1561295. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
3
Prevention of problem behavior through annual family check-ups in early childhood: intervention effects from home to early elementary school.通过在幼儿期进行年度家庭体检预防问题行为:从家庭到小学早期的干预效果。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2014;42(3):343-54. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9768-2.
4
Collateral benefits of the family check-up in early childhood: primary caregivers' social support and relationship satisfaction.婴幼儿家庭体检的附带益处:主要照顾者的社会支持和关系满意度。
J Fam Psychol. 2013 Apr;27(2):271-281. doi: 10.1037/a0031485. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
5
Preventing weight gain and obesity: indirect effects of the family check-up in early childhood.预防体重增加和肥胖:儿童早期家庭体检的间接影响。
Prev Sci. 2015 Apr;16(3):408-19. doi: 10.1007/s11121-014-0505-z.
6
Effects of video feedback on early coercive parent-child interactions: the intervening role of caregivers' relational schemas.视频反馈对早期强制性亲子互动的影响:照顾者关系图式的中介作用。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2013;42(3):405-17. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2013.777917. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
7
Family-based prevention of adolescents' co-occurring internalizing/externalizing problems through early childhood parent factors.通过幼儿期父母因素预防青少年共患的内化/外化问题的家庭预防。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019 Nov;87(11):1056-1067. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000439. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
8
The trajectory of fidelity in a multiyear trial of the family check-up predicts change in child problem behavior.在一项为期多年的家庭体检试验中,忠诚度轨迹可预测儿童问题行为的变化。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Oct;83(5):1006-11. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000034. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
9
An Experimental Study of Procedures to Enhance Ratings of Fidelity to an Evidence-Based Family Intervention.提高基于证据的家庭干预忠诚度评分程序的实验研究
Prev Sci. 2016 Jan;17(1):62-70. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0589-0.
10
Engaging parents in the family check-up in middle school: longitudinal effects on family conflict and problem behavior through the high school transition.让家长参与中学时期的家庭体检:通过高中过渡对家庭冲突和问题行为的纵向影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2012 Jun;50(6):627-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.10.255. Epub 2012 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
RE-AIMing for health equity: Using RE-AIM to evaluate equitable implementation of the family check-up 4 health.以 RE-AIM 实现健康公平:运用 RE-AIM 评估“家庭健康检查 4”的公平实施情况
Psychol Serv. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1037/ser0000974.
2
What is fidelity? A systematic review of provider fidelity and its associations with engagement and outcomes in parenting programs.什么是保真度?对提供者保真度及其与育儿项目中的参与度和结果之间的关联进行的系统综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2025 Feb;115:102531. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102531. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
3
Digital Health Delivery of Parenting Skills to Improve Conduct Problems in Middle School Youth Across Two Distinct Randomized Trials.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood Approaches in Analyzing Structural Equation Models with Small Sample Sizes.小样本结构方程模型分析中贝叶斯方法与极大似然法的评估
Multivariate Behav Res. 2004 Oct 1;39(4):653-86. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3904_4.
2
Results of a pragmatic effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial of the Family Check-up in community mental health agencies.社区心理健康机构中家庭检查实用有效性-实施混合试验的结果
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015 May;42(3):265-78. doi: 10.1007/s10488-014-0566-0.
3
Prevention of problem behavior through annual family check-ups in early childhood: intervention effects from home to early elementary school.
通过数字方式提供育儿技能以改善两个不同随机试验中的中学生行为问题
Prev Sci. 2024 Nov 18. doi: 10.1007/s11121-024-01750-2.
4
Family Check-Up Online effects on parenting and parent wellbeing in families of toddler to preschool-age children.在线家庭检查对幼儿至学龄前儿童家庭中育儿方式和父母幸福感的影响。
Early Child Res Q. 2025;70:144-153. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2024.09.009. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
5
Family Check-Up Online: Effects of a Virtual Randomized Trial on Parent Stress, Parenting, and Child Outcomes in Early Adolescence.在线家庭检查:虚拟随机试验对青少年早期父母压力、育儿方式和儿童结局的影响。
Prev Sci. 2024 Sep 24. doi: 10.1007/s11121-024-01725-3.
6
Adolescent-onset cannabis use and parenting young children: an investigation of differential effectiveness of a digital parenting intervention.青少年期开始使用大麻与养育幼儿:一项关于数字育儿干预措施不同效果的调查。
Front Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024;3. doi: 10.3389/frcha.2024.1392541. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
7
Book-Sharing for Toddlers with Clefts (BOOST): Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of a remote intervention to promote language development in children with cleft palate.幼儿唇腭裂图书分享(BOOST):一项远程干预促进腭裂儿童语言发展的随机对照试验方案
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 13;19(6):e0304630. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304630. eCollection 2024.
8
The Case for Assessing and Reporting on Facilitator Fidelity: Introducing the Fidelity of Implementation in Parenting Programs Guideline.评估与报告促进者忠诚度的理由:引入育儿项目实施忠诚度指南
Glob Implement Res Appl. 2024;4(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s43477-023-00092-5. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
9
A Longitudinal Analysis of Trajectories and Predictors of Fidelity Using the SafeCare Parenting Model.使用安全护理育儿模式对保真度轨迹和预测因素的纵向分析。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 Mar;51(2):240-253. doi: 10.1007/s10488-023-01336-0. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
10
A machine learning approach to improve implementation monitoring of family-based preventive interventions in primary care.一种用于改善基层医疗中基于家庭的预防性干预措施实施监测的机器学习方法。
Implement Res Pract. 2023 Jul 25;4:26334895231187906. doi: 10.1177/26334895231187906. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
通过在幼儿期进行年度家庭体检预防问题行为:从家庭到小学早期的干预效果。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2014;42(3):343-54. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9768-2.
4
Sustaining fidelity following the nationwide PMTO™ implementation in Norway.挪威全国范围内 PMTO™ 实施后的维持保真度。
Prev Sci. 2011 Sep;12(3):235-46. doi: 10.1007/s11121-011-0225-6.
5
Putting the pieces together: an integrated model of program implementation.整合碎片:计划实施的综合模型。
Prev Sci. 2011 Mar;12(1):23-33. doi: 10.1007/s11121-010-0186-1.
6
Long-term impact of prevention programs to promote effective parenting: lasting effects but uncertain processes.预防项目对促进有效育儿的长期影响:持久效果但不确定过程。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:299-329. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131619.
7
Therapeutic assessment for preadolescent boys with oppositional defiant disorder: a replicated single-case time-series design.针对患有对立违抗障碍的青春期前男孩的治疗评估:一项复制的单病例时间序列设计。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Sep;22(3):593-602. doi: 10.1037/a0019697.
8
The dissemination and implementation of evidence-based psychological treatments. A review of current efforts.基于证据的心理治疗的传播和实施。 当前努力的回顾。
Am Psychol. 2010 Feb-Mar;65(2):73-84. doi: 10.1037/a0018121.
9
Bayesian mediation analysis.贝叶斯中介分析。
Psychol Methods. 2009 Dec;14(4):301-22. doi: 10.1037/a0016972.
10
The impact of evidence-based practice implementation and fidelity monitoring on staff turnover: evidence for a protective effect.循证实践的实施及保真度监测对员工流动率的影响:保护作用的证据
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Apr;77(2):270-80. doi: 10.1037/a0013223.