Suppr超能文献

量化购药的致贫效应:发展中国家药品可负担性的跨国比较。

Quantifying the impoverishing effects of purchasing medicines: a cross-country comparison of the affordability of medicines in the developing world.

机构信息

Institute for Medical Technology Assessment and Institute for Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2010 Aug 31;7(8):e1000333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000333.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increasing attention is being paid to the affordability of medicines in low- and middle-income countries (LICs and MICs) where medicines are often highly priced in relation to income levels. The impoverishing effect of medicine purchases can be estimated by determining pre- and postpayment incomes, which are then compared to a poverty line. Here we estimate the impoverishing effects of four medicines in 16 LICs and MICs using the impoverishment method as a metric of affordability.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Affordability was assessed in terms of the proportion of the population being pushed below US$1.25 or US$2 per day poverty levels because of the purchase of medicines. The prices of salbutamol 100 mcg/dose inhaler, glibenclamide 5 mg cap/tab, atenolol 50 mg cap/tab, and amoxicillin 250 mg cap/tab were obtained from facility-based surveys undertaken using a standard measurement methodology. The World Bank's World Development Indicators provided household expenditure data and information on income distributions. In the countries studied, purchasing these medicines would impoverish large portions of the population (up to 86%). Originator brand products were less affordable than the lowest-priced generic equivalents. In the Philippines, for example, originator brand atenolol would push an additional 22% of the population below US$1.25 per day, whereas for the lowest priced generic equivalent this demographic shift is 7%. Given related prevalence figures, substantial numbers of people are affected by the unaffordability of medicines.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparing medicine prices to available income in LICs and MICs shows that medicine purchases by individuals in those countries could lead to the impoverishment of large numbers of people. Action is needed to improve medicine affordability, such as promoting the use of quality assured, low-priced generics, and establishing health insurance systems. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

摘要

背景

人们越来越关注中低收入国家(LICs 和 MICs)药品的可负担性,因为这些国家的药品价格往往与收入水平相比过高。可以通过确定购药前后的收入,并将其与贫困线进行比较来评估药品购买对贫困的影响。在这里,我们使用贫困衡量法来评估四种药物在 16 个中低收入国家和中等收入国家的贫困影响。

方法和发现

根据因购买药品而使多少人口陷入每天 1.25 美元或 2 美元以下贫困线的比例来评估可负担性。沙丁胺醇 100 mcg/剂量吸入器、格列本脲 5 毫克胶囊/片剂、阿替洛尔 50 毫克胶囊/片剂和阿莫西林 250 毫克胶囊/片剂的价格是通过使用标准测量方法进行的基于机构的调查获得的。世界银行的世界发展指标提供了家庭支出数据和收入分布信息。在所研究的国家中,购买这些药品将使大部分人口(高达 86%)陷入贫困。原研品牌产品的价格比最便宜的仿制药更贵。例如,在菲律宾,原研品牌阿替洛尔将使另外 22%的人口陷入每天 1.25 美元以下的贫困,而对于最便宜的仿制药,这一人口变化为 7%。鉴于相关的患病率数据,相当多的人受到药品不可负担的影响。

结论

将药品价格与中低收入国家的可支配收入进行比较表明,这些国家的个人购买药品可能导致大量人口陷入贫困。需要采取行动来提高药品的可负担性,例如促进使用质量保证、价格低廉的仿制药,并建立医疗保险制度。请在文章后面查看编辑摘要。

相似文献

2
5
Medicine prices, availability, and affordability in 36 developing and middle-income countries: a secondary analysis.
Lancet. 2009 Jan 17;373(9659):240-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61762-6. Epub 2008 Nov 29.
6
High medicine prices and poor affordability.
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2011 Jul;24(4):341-5. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283477b68.
7
Switching from originator brand medicines to generic equivalents in selected developing countries: how much could be saved?
Value Health. 2012 Jul-Aug;15(5):664-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
9
Prices, Availability and Affordability of Medicines with Value-Added Tax Exemption: A Cross-Sectional Survey in the Philippines.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 21;17(14):5242. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145242.
10
Access to affordable medicines after health reform: evidence from two cross-sectional surveys in Shaanxi Province, western China.
Lancet Glob Health. 2013 Oct;1(4):e227-37. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70072-X. Epub 2013 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Revisiting the issue of access to medicines in Africa: Challenges and recommendations.
Public Health Chall. 2022 Jun 15;1(2):e9. doi: 10.1002/puh2.9. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Key stakeholders' views on the causes of medicine stock-outs in Mauritania: A qualitative study.
PLoS One. 2025 May 27;20(5):e0304930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304930. eCollection 2025.
8
Catastrophic pharmaceutical expenditure in patients with type 2 diabetes in Iran.
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Dec 29;21(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01791-5.
10
Closing gaps in medication taking for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease patients among US adults.
Heliyon. 2022 Nov 11;8(11):e11530. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11530. eCollection 2022 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Practical measurement of affordability: an application to medicines.
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Mar 1;90(3):219-27. doi: 10.2471/BLT.10.084087. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
2
Global strategies to reduce the price of antiretroviral medicines: evidence from transactional databases.
Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Jul;87(7):520-8. doi: 10.2471/blt.08.058925.
3
Better measures of affordability required.
Lancet. 2009 Mar 28;373(9669):1081; author reply 1081-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60649-8.
4
Medicine prices, availability, and affordability in 36 developing and middle-income countries: a secondary analysis.
Lancet. 2009 Jan 17;373(9659):240-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61762-6. Epub 2008 Nov 29.
6
Thailand: government issues compulsory licences for HIV/AIDS drugs.
HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev. 2007 May;12(1):28-9.
7
Sustaining access to antiretroviral therapy in the less-developed world: lessons from Brazil and Thailand.
AIDS. 2007 Jul;21 Suppl 4:S21-9. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000279703.78685.a6.
9
Is health insurance affordable for the uninsured?
J Health Econ. 2006 Jul;25(4):650-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.11.003. Epub 2006 Jun 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验