Institute for Medical Technology Assessment and Institute for Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
PLoS Med. 2010 Aug 31;7(8):e1000333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000333.
Increasing attention is being paid to the affordability of medicines in low- and middle-income countries (LICs and MICs) where medicines are often highly priced in relation to income levels. The impoverishing effect of medicine purchases can be estimated by determining pre- and postpayment incomes, which are then compared to a poverty line. Here we estimate the impoverishing effects of four medicines in 16 LICs and MICs using the impoverishment method as a metric of affordability.
Affordability was assessed in terms of the proportion of the population being pushed below US$1.25 or US$2 per day poverty levels because of the purchase of medicines. The prices of salbutamol 100 mcg/dose inhaler, glibenclamide 5 mg cap/tab, atenolol 50 mg cap/tab, and amoxicillin 250 mg cap/tab were obtained from facility-based surveys undertaken using a standard measurement methodology. The World Bank's World Development Indicators provided household expenditure data and information on income distributions. In the countries studied, purchasing these medicines would impoverish large portions of the population (up to 86%). Originator brand products were less affordable than the lowest-priced generic equivalents. In the Philippines, for example, originator brand atenolol would push an additional 22% of the population below US$1.25 per day, whereas for the lowest priced generic equivalent this demographic shift is 7%. Given related prevalence figures, substantial numbers of people are affected by the unaffordability of medicines.
Comparing medicine prices to available income in LICs and MICs shows that medicine purchases by individuals in those countries could lead to the impoverishment of large numbers of people. Action is needed to improve medicine affordability, such as promoting the use of quality assured, low-priced generics, and establishing health insurance systems. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
人们越来越关注中低收入国家(LICs 和 MICs)药品的可负担性,因为这些国家的药品价格往往与收入水平相比过高。可以通过确定购药前后的收入,并将其与贫困线进行比较来评估药品购买对贫困的影响。在这里,我们使用贫困衡量法来评估四种药物在 16 个中低收入国家和中等收入国家的贫困影响。
根据因购买药品而使多少人口陷入每天 1.25 美元或 2 美元以下贫困线的比例来评估可负担性。沙丁胺醇 100 mcg/剂量吸入器、格列本脲 5 毫克胶囊/片剂、阿替洛尔 50 毫克胶囊/片剂和阿莫西林 250 毫克胶囊/片剂的价格是通过使用标准测量方法进行的基于机构的调查获得的。世界银行的世界发展指标提供了家庭支出数据和收入分布信息。在所研究的国家中,购买这些药品将使大部分人口(高达 86%)陷入贫困。原研品牌产品的价格比最便宜的仿制药更贵。例如,在菲律宾,原研品牌阿替洛尔将使另外 22%的人口陷入每天 1.25 美元以下的贫困,而对于最便宜的仿制药,这一人口变化为 7%。鉴于相关的患病率数据,相当多的人受到药品不可负担的影响。
将药品价格与中低收入国家的可支配收入进行比较表明,这些国家的个人购买药品可能导致大量人口陷入贫困。需要采取行动来提高药品的可负担性,例如促进使用质量保证、价格低廉的仿制药,并建立医疗保险制度。请在文章后面查看编辑摘要。