Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute/University of Basel, PO Box, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland.
Prev Vet Med. 2011 Sep 1;101(3-4):148-56. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.07.003. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
Faced with complex patterns of global change, the inextricable interconnection of humans, pet animals, livestock and wildlife and their social and ecological environment is evident and requires integrated approaches to human and animal health and their respective social and environmental contexts. The history of integrative thinking of human and animal health is briefly reviewed from early historical times, to the foundation of universities in Europe, up to the beginning of comparative medicine at the end of the 19th century. In the 20th century, Calvin Schwabe coined the concept of "one medicine". It recognises that there is no difference of paradigm between human and veterinary medicine and both disciplines can contribute to the development of each other. Considering a broader approach to health and well-being of societies, the original concept of "one medicine" was extended to "one health" through practical implementations and careful validations in different settings. Given the global health thinking in recent decades, ecosystem approaches to health have emerged. Based on complex ecological thinking that goes beyond humans and animals, these approaches consider inextricable linkages between ecosystems and health, known as "ecosystem health". Despite these integrative conceptual and methodological developments, large portions of human and animal health thinking and actions still remain in separate disciplinary silos. Evidence for added value of a coherent application of "one health" compared to separated sectorial thinking is, however, now growing. Integrative thinking is increasingly being considered in academic curricula, clinical practice, ministries of health and livestock/agriculture and international organizations. Challenges remain, focusing around key questions such as how does "one health" evolve and what are the elements of a modern theory of health? The close interdependence of humans and animals in their social and ecological context relates to the concept of "human-environmental systems", also called "social-ecological systems". The theory and practice of understanding and managing human activities in the context of social-ecological systems has been well-developed by members of The Resilience Alliance and was used extensively in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, including its work on human well-being outcomes. This in turn entails systems theory applied to human and animal health. Examples of successful systems approaches to public health show unexpected results. Analogous to "systems biology" which focuses mostly on the interplay of proteins and molecules at a sub-cellular level, a systemic approach to health in social-ecological systems (HSES) is an inter- and trans-disciplinary study of complex interactions in all health-related fields. HSES moves beyond "one health" and "eco-health", expecting to identify emerging properties and determinants of health that may arise from a systemic view ranging across scales from molecules to the ecological and socio-cultural context, as well from the comparison with different disease endemicities and health systems structures.
面对复杂的全球变化模式,人类、宠物动物、牲畜和野生动物之间不可分割的相互联系及其社会和生态环境显而易见,需要采用综合方法来处理人类和动物健康及其各自的社会和环境背景。本文简要回顾了从早期历史到欧洲大学的建立,再到 19 世纪末比较医学开始的人类与动物健康综合思维的历史。在 20 世纪,Calvin Schwabe 创造了“同一医学”的概念。它认识到人类医学和兽医医学之间没有范式差异,这两个学科都可以相互促进发展。考虑到社会健康和福祉的更广泛方法,最初的“同一医学”概念通过在不同环境中的实际实施和仔细验证扩展到了“同一健康”。鉴于近几十年来的全球健康思维,出现了基于生态系统的健康方法。这些方法基于超越人类和动物的复杂生态思维,考虑到生态系统与健康之间不可分割的联系,被称为“生态系统健康”。尽管这些综合的概念和方法学的发展,人类和动物健康思维和行动的大部分仍然存在于单独的学科领域中。然而,目前越来越多的证据表明,连贯应用“同一健康”比分开的部门思维具有更大的价值。综合思维越来越多地被纳入学术课程、临床实践、卫生部门以及牲畜/农业和国际组织。然而,挑战仍然存在,主要集中在“同一健康”如何演变以及健康的现代理论的要素是什么等关键问题上。人类与其社会和生态环境中的动物密切相关,这与“人类-环境系统”或“社会-生态系统”的概念有关。理解和管理社会生态系统中人类活动的理论和实践已经被“弹性联盟”的成员很好地发展了,并且在千年生态系统评估中得到了广泛的应用,包括其对人类福祉结果的研究。这反过来又需要将系统理论应用于人类和动物健康。成功的公共卫生系统方法的例子显示出意想不到的结果。类似于主要关注亚细胞水平上蛋白质和分子相互作用的“系统生物学”,社会生态系统中的健康系统方法(HSES)是对所有与健康相关领域中复杂相互作用的跨学科和跨学科研究。HSES超越了“同一健康”和“生态健康”,期望从系统的角度识别可能出现的健康新兴特性和决定因素,该系统视角从分子范围到生态和社会文化背景跨越了不同的尺度,还可以与不同的疾病流行率和健康系统结构进行比较。