Graham Jay P, Leibler Jessica H, Price Lance B, Otte Joachim M, Pfeiffer Dirk U, Tiensin T, Silbergeld Ellen K
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Division of Environmental Health Engineering, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Public Health Rep. 2008 May-Jun;123(3):282-99. doi: 10.1177/003335490812300309.
Understanding interactions between animals and humans is critical in preventing outbreaks of zoonotic disease. This is particularly important for avian influenza. Food animal production has been transformed since the 1918 influenza pandemic. Poultry and swine production have changed from small-scale methods to industrial-scale operations. There is substantial evidence of pathogen movement between and among these industrial facilities, release to the external environment, and exposure to farm workers, which challenges the assumption that modern poultry production is more biosecure and biocontained as compared with backyard or small holder operations in preventing introduction and release of pathogens. An analysis of data from the Thai government investigation in 2004 indicates that the odds of H5N1 outbreaks and infections were significantly higher in large-scale commercial poultry operations as compared with backyard flocks. These data suggest that successful strategies to prevent or mitigate the emergence of pandemic avian influenza must consider risk factors specific to modern industrialized food animal production.
了解动物与人类之间的相互作用对于预防人畜共患病的爆发至关重要。这对于禽流感尤为重要。自1918年流感大流行以来,食用动物生产发生了转变。家禽和生猪生产已从小规模方式转变为工业化规模经营。有大量证据表明病原体在这些工业设施之间移动、释放到外部环境并暴露于农场工人,这对现代家禽生产在防止病原体引入和释放方面比后院或小规模养殖更具生物安全性和生物封闭性这一假设提出了挑战。对泰国政府2004年调查数据的分析表明,与后院鸡群相比,大规模商业家禽养殖场发生H5N1疫情和感染的几率显著更高。这些数据表明,预防或减轻大流行性禽流感出现的成功策略必须考虑现代工业化食用动物生产特有的风险因素。