• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

本科处方课程学习成果的制定(英国药理学会处方制定倡议)。

Development of learning outcomes for an undergraduate prescribing curriculum (British Pharmacological Society prescribing initiative).

机构信息

Division of Medical and Dental Education, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen and School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Oct;70(4):604-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03581.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03581.x
PMID:20840451
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2950995/
Abstract

AIMS

The question of whether new medical graduates are adequately prepared for the challenge of prescribing has been raised. Although broad outcomes for prescribing competency have been agreed, clarity is needed on the detailed outcomes expected of new graduates. This study aimed to create a consensus on the required competencies for new graduates in the area of prescribing.

METHODS

We used a modified Delphi approach based on the findings of a systematic review of educational interventions for improved prescribing. Panellists were asked to rank the importance of a list of 53 possible learning outcomes and to add any additional outcomes felt to be missing.

RESULTS

Of the 48 experts who were invited to participate, 28 agreed (58%). Forty-five learning outcomes were included from the original list of 53. A further nine outcomes were suggested by panellists, of which five were included. The wording of three outcomes was changed in line with suggestions from the panellists. Many of the agreed outcomes relate to improving patient safety through medication review, checking appropriateness of the drug for the patient, recognizing the prescriber's limitations and seeking advice when needed. Enhanced communication with the patient and healthcare team, better documentation in the notes and discharge letters were key areas featured in this Delphi exercise.

DISCUSSION

This study has identified 50 learning outcomes for teaching prescribing. These build on the existing British Pharmacological Society document by focusing specifically on prescribing, with greater emphasis on avoiding medication errors and better communication.

摘要

目的

新的医学毕业生是否为开处方的挑战做好了充分准备,这一问题已经提出。虽然已经就处方能力的广泛结果达成了共识,但需要明确新毕业生所期望的详细结果。本研究旨在就处方领域新毕业生所需的能力达成共识。

方法

我们使用了一种基于系统评价教育干预措施以提高处方能力的发现的改良 Delphi 方法。小组成员被要求对 53 项可能的学习结果进行重要性排序,并添加他们认为缺失的任何其他结果。

结果

在被邀请参与的 48 名专家中,有 28 名(58%)同意参与。从最初的 53 项中包含了 45 项学习结果。小组成员还提出了另外 9 项结果,其中 5 项被纳入。根据小组成员的建议,对三个结果的措辞进行了修改。许多已达成的结果都涉及通过药物审查来提高患者安全性、检查药物对患者的适宜性、认识到开处方者的局限性并在需要时寻求建议。增强与患者和医疗团队的沟通、更好地记录在医嘱和出院记录中是这项 Delphi 研究中的重点领域。

讨论

本研究确定了 50 项教学处方的学习结果。这些结果建立在现有的英国药理学会文件基础上,专门针对处方,更加强调避免药物错误和更好的沟通。

相似文献

1
Development of learning outcomes for an undergraduate prescribing curriculum (British Pharmacological Society prescribing initiative).本科处方课程学习成果的制定(英国药理学会处方制定倡议)。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Oct;70(4):604-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03581.x.
2
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Comparison of cellulose, modified cellulose and synthetic membranes in the haemodialysis of patients with end-stage renal disease.纤维素、改性纤维素和合成膜在终末期肾病患者血液透析中的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD003234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003234.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
7
Clinician-targeted interventions to influence antibiotic prescribing behaviour for acute respiratory infections in primary care: an overview of systematic reviews.针对临床医生的干预措施对基层医疗中急性呼吸道感染抗生素处方行为的影响:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 7;9(9):CD012252. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012252.pub2.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.

引用本文的文献

1
European List of Essential Medicines for Medical Education: a protocol for a modified Delphi study.欧洲医学教育基本药物清单:一项修正德尔菲研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 4;11(5):e045635. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045635.
2
Evaluating prescribing competencies covered in a Canadian-accredited undergraduate pharmacy program in Qatar: a curriculum mapping process.评估卡塔尔一所获得加拿大认证的本科药学专业课程中涵盖的处方能力:课程映射过程。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Aug 6;20(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02109-1.
3
Teaching the principles of safe prescribing to a mixed profession postgraduate cohort: program development.向混合专业的研究生群体传授安全处方原则:课程开发
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018 Oct 30;11:635-644. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S169424. eCollection 2018.
4
Do final-year medical students have sufficient prescribing competencies? A systematic literature review.应届医学专业毕业生是否具备足够的处方能力?一项系统文献回顾。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Apr;84(4):615-635. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13491. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
5
Key Learning Outcomes for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics Education in Europe: A Modified Delphi Study.欧洲临床药理学与治疗学教育的关键学习成果:一项改良 Delphi 研究。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Aug;104(2):317-325. doi: 10.1002/cpt.962. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
6
Confidence in Prescription Writing among Junior Physicians in Trinidad and Tobago.特立尼达和多巴哥初级医生开具处方的信心
West Indian Med J. 2015 Sep;64(4):407-12. doi: 10.7727/wimj.2014.087. Epub 2015 May 4.
7
Teaching safe prescribing to medical students: perspectives in the UK.向医学生传授安全开药知识:英国的观点
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2015 Apr 17;6:279-95. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S56179. eCollection 2015.
8
Prescribing and the core curriculum for tomorrow's doctors: BPS curriculum in clinical pharmacology and prescribing for medical students.为明天的医生制定处方和核心课程:医学生临床药理学和处方的 BPS 课程。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Oct;74(4):644-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04186.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Do educational interventions improve prescribing by medical students and junior doctors? A systematic review.教育干预措施能否提高医学生和初级医生的处方水平?系统评价。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Jun;67(6):662-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03395.x.
2
Undergraduate preparation for prescribing: the views of 2413 UK medical students and recent graduates.本科阶段的处方开具准备:2413名英国医学生及近期毕业生的观点
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Jul;66(1):128-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03197.x.
3
Foundation year 1 doctors and clinical pharmacology and therapeutics teaching. A retrospective view in light of experience.一年级基础医生与临床药理学和治疗学教学:基于经验的回顾
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Sep;64(3):363-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02925.x. Epub 2007 May 15.
4
From undergraduate medical education to pre-registration house officer year: how prepared are students?从本科医学教育到注册前住院医师阶段:学生准备得如何?
Med Teach. 2006 Aug;28(5):435-9. doi: 10.1080/01421590600625171.
5
A prescription for better prescribing.优化处方的良方。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 May;61(5):487-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02649.x.
6
The transition from medical student to doctor: perceptions of final year students and preregistration house officers related to expected learning outcomes.从医学生到医生的转变:与预期学习成果相关的最后一年学生和预注册住院医师的看法。
Int J Clin Pract. 2005 Mar;59(3):324-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2005.00438.x.
7
Reducing prescribing error: competence, control, and culture.减少处方错误:能力、控制与文化。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Dec;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i29-32. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.suppl_1.i29.
8
Teaching safe and effective prescribing in UK medical schools: a core curriculum for tomorrow's doctors.英国医学院校安全有效处方教学:面向未来医生的核心课程。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Jun;55(6):496-503. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01878.x.
9
Causes of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a prospective study.住院患者用药错误的原因:一项前瞻性研究。
Lancet. 2002 Apr 20;359(9315):1373-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08350-2.
10
Epidemiology of medical error.医疗差错的流行病学
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):774-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.774.